Many fields of research have recently made significant progress with the use of wearable sensors for the evaluation, monitoring, and analysis of health in several contexts, including healthcare

Setting is a fundamental movement in volleyball. While there are several optimal interpreters of the role in professional play, there is a surprising lack of advanced measurement techniques for the evaluation of the movement from a biomechanical perspective. We proposed a comprehensive motion analysis protocol based on kinematics and motor coordination assessment (muscle synergies) for an in-depth analysis of the setting gesture. We also quantified the test–retest performance and discussed in detail the potential of the method. A single experienced player (age 27) tested and retested the protocol. The protocol was quite rapid to perform (about 30 min, including placement of kinematic and electromyography sensors on the patient’s body); we found high test and re-test consistency in different sessions within this participant (ICC > 0.90). These preliminary results suggest that the protocol could support the use of the state-of-the-art methods for motion analysis and biomechanics in volleyball and sports in general.

Background/Objectives: Industry 5.0 emphasizes the protection and empowerment of human workers. Passive wearables reduce physical strain, but the evaluation of their efficacy remains incomplete when based solely on kinematics or electromyographic (EMG) envelope amplitude, failing to capture the underlying neural “cost” or the compensatory strategies. This paper proposes a computational framework centered on muscle synergy analysis to bridge the gap between laboratory-grade neural assessment and real-world industrial applications. The goal is to move beyond simple biomechanical metrics toward a deeper understanding of neural coordination during device interaction. Methods: Given the practical limitations of high-density EMG in industrial settings, we propose a “streamlining” approach: laboratory-derived synergy models guide the understanding of neural processes and the selection of a minimal set of sensors capable of detecting maladaptive motor compensations and early signs of fatigue. Results: This approach allows for long-term monitoring without compromising natural movement. By decoupling neural strategies from kinematic output, “silent” risk situations can be identified even when movement appears correct but the neural coordination is altered by the passive device. This supports personalized ergonomic indices and predictive prevention protocols, transforming wearables from simple mechanical aids into intelligent, human-centric systems. Conclusions: This framework provides a roadmap for translating complex motor control theories into practical tools for the next generation of safe and sustainable manufacturing.

Stroke frequently results in persistent upper limb impairments, which are often accompanied by compensatory movement strategies that are not fully captured by conventional clinical assessment scales. Quantitative kinematic analyses may provide more objective and sensitive measures of motor dysfunction. In this study, we propose a probabilistic, distribution-based analysis of upper limb kinematics to quantify motor disability in post-stroke patients. We analyzed reaching movement data acquired with a markerless Kinect V2 system from 36 post-stroke patients and age-matched healthy controls. Wrist velocity profiles were characterized using distribution metrics, including variance, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy, and divergence measures (Hellinger distance, Kullback–Leibler divergence, and Jensen–Shannon divergence). Group differences between patients and controls, as well as across impairment levels stratified by the Fugl-Meyer (FM) score, were evaluated. Several distribution metrics significantly discriminated patients from controls and scaled with motor impairment severity. In particular, divergence-based measures showed a strong association with FM scores, indicating increasing deviation from normative movement patterns with greater impairment. These findings demonstrate that distribution-based metrics focusing on kinematic analysis provide a clinically meaningful, objective descriptor of motor dysfunction and complement conventional biomechanical assessments, offering a sensitive framework for quantifying motor disability after stroke.