The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) developed consensus statements on pre-invasive vulvar lesions in order to improve the quality of care for patients with vulvar squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, vulvar Paget disease in situ, and melanoma in situ. For differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), an excisional procedure must always be adopted. For vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (VHSIL), both excisional procedures and ablative ones can be used. The latter can be considered for anatomy and function preservation and must be preceded by several representative biopsies to exclude malignancy. Medical treatment (imiquimod or cidofovir) can be considered for VHSIL. Recent studies favor an approach of using imiquimod in vulvar Paget’s disease. Surgery must take into consideration that the extension of the disease is usually wider than what is evident in the skin. A 2 cm margin is usually considered necessary. A wide local excision with 1 cm free surgical margins is recommended for melanoma in situ. Following treatment of pre-invasive vulvar lesions, women should be seen on a regular basis for careful clinical assessment, including biopsy of any suspicious area. Follow-up should be modulated according to the risk of recurrence (type of lesion, patient age and immunological conditions, other associated lower genital tract lesions).

Next-generation human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines encompass newly licensed and emerging formulations that employ alternative production platforms, expanded valency, or novel antigenic targets beyond conventional L1-based vaccines. These vaccines aim to address affordability challenges, supply limitations, and suboptimal vaccination coverage, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This review aggregates current clinical, immunological, and programme-related evidence on newly licensed vaccines, including the World Health Organization (WHO)-prequalified bivalent formulations (Cecolin^® and Walrinvax^®), the quadrivalent Cervavac^®, and the Escherichia coli-derived nonavalent Cecolin 9^®, which received national licensure in 2025. Additionally, emerging high-valency candidates in Phase I–III trials—9-valent, 11-valent, and 14-valent formulations—are critically assessed. Clinical trials demonstrate that next-generation HPV vaccines provide robust protection; for example, Cecolin^® showed 100% efficacy against HPV-16/18-associated high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and up to 97.8% efficacy against persistent HPV infection, while Walrinvax^® demonstrated 78.6% protection against CIN2+ lesions. Cervavac^® showed non-inferior immunogenicity compared with established vaccines. While comparative analyses of efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety indicate that these vaccines are strong alternatives to established products, robust long-term effectiveness and real-world impact data remain essential before full clinical equivalence can be definitively established. Advances in L2-based platforms further aim to broaden cross-type protection, simplify manufacturing, and enable thermostable formulations, thereby enhancing applicability in resource-limited settings. Economic evaluations demonstrating favorable cost-effectiveness emphasize the essential role of next-generation vaccines in improving access and reducing inequity. Overall, innovations in valency, technology, and delivery strategies have the potential to significantly expand global HPV prevention coverage and accelerate progress toward cervical cancer elimination.

The effect of dienogest treatment on anti-Mullerian hormone in patients with endometrioma: a 12-month follow-up study - Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association

Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted virus worldwide and is frequently detected in women of reproductive age. In this population, HPV-related diseases and their management may affect reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on HPV infection and HPV-related diseases in relation to fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes, and discusses preventive strategies, with a particular focus on HPV vaccination. Methods: An international, multidisciplinary team of clinicians from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Prevention Committee reviewed the literature on HPV, HPV-related diseases, HPV vaccination, and reproductive outcomes, without time restrictions, prioritizing studies judged to meaningfully reflect the available evidence. Results: The most consistent evidence linking HPV-related conditions to adverse pregnancy outcomes relates to the treatment of cervical precancer, particularly excisional procedures, which are associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and mid-trimester pregnancy loss. In contrast, evidence that maternal HPV detection alone causes adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes remains limited and inconsistent. Data on HPV infection and subfertility are scarce and heterogeneous. Management of HPV-related lesions during pregnancy remains challenging and requires careful balancing of maternal safety with avoidance of unnecessary interventions. HPV DNA has been detected in neonatal samples, but convincing evidence for clinically relevant vertical transmission is lacking. Available data indicate that inadvertent HPV vaccination shortly before or during pregnancy is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that reproductive risks are more strongly associated with the treatment of HPV-related diseases than with HPV infection itself. Preventive strategies—especially HPV vaccination—remain central to reducing HPV-related disease burden. Although HPV vaccines are not routinely recommended during pregnancy, evidence supports the safety of inadvertent exposure around conception or during gestation, while potential long-term benefits of vaccination regarding reproductive health require further study.

Background/Objectives: Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection can lead to malignancies of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, anus, and oropharynx. The increasing incidence of HPV-related head and neck cancers has raised concerns regarding potential occupational exposure and transmission risks among healthcare workers. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence on occupational HPV transmission in healthcare settings. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to August 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Expert opinions and practical recommendations from members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Prevention Committee were included to support interpretation of the results. Results: The available literature on occupational HPV transmission was limited, with a paucity of high-quality studies. Nevertheless, existing data suggest a potential occupational risk, particularly during aerosol or smoke-generating procedures performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer. Several studies reported the detection of HPV DNA in surgical smoke or on instruments used during such procedures, indicating possible exposure among healthcare workers. Conclusions: Although current evidence is insufficient to definitively classify HPV infection as an occupational disease, available data indicate a potential exposure risk for healthcare workers involved in HPV-related procedures. Preventive measures, like personal protective equipment, should be emphasized. HPV vaccination has been recommended by some professional societies for healthcare workers performing gynecological procedures, though further research is needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy beyond the standard age range and its cost-effectiveness in this context.

Background: To compare outcomes between older (≥ 70 years) and younger (< 70 years) patients with surgically treated endometrial cancer, evaluating the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), and Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 319 patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary center (2014–2024). Demographics, pathology, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. Perioperative morbidity was graded (Clavien–Dindo). Frailty (ACCI), PNI, and SII were assessed. Overall survival and disease-specific survival were analyzed in parallel; Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed overall and stratified by stage and histology. Major morbidity was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 319 patients, 93 (29.2%) were aged ≥ 70 years. Older patients more frequently exhibited high-grade histology, advanced stage, ASA III–IV status, high ACCI, and low PNI. Admissions to the intensive care unit were higher in older patients, but major morbidity (4.3% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.60) and 30-day mortality (1.1% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.60) were comparable between groups. Low PNI demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability for major complications. In multivariable analysis, low PNI (odds ratio 5.78; p = 0.012) and ASA III–IV (odds ratio 3.89; p = 0.047) were independently associated with major morbidity, whereas age ≥ 70 was not. For overall survival, higher PNI remained protective (hazard ratio 0.48 per 5-point increase; p < 0.001) and ASA III–IV predicted worse outcomes (hazard ratio 3.80; p = 0.002); however, chronological age was not an independent predictor. Conclusion: Older age is associated with more aggressive tumor biology but not with higher rates of major complications. PNI and ASA class are independent predictors of major morbidity and survival and should be integrated into perioperative risk stratification rather than using chronological age alone.