Background: The COVID‐19 pandemic has significantly impacted medical training. Here we assess its effect on head and neck surgical education.Methods: Surveys were sent to current accredited program directors and trainees to assess the impact of COVID‐19 on the fellow's experience and employment search. Current fellows' operative logs were compared with those of the 2018 to 2019 graduates.Results: Despite reduction in operative volume, 82% of current American Head and Neck Society fellows have reached the number of major surgical operations to support certification. When surveyed, 86% of program directors deemed their fellow ready to enter practice. The majority of fellows felt prepared to practice ablative (96%), and microvascular surgery (73%), and 57% have secured employment to follow graduation. Five (10%) had a pending job position put on hold due to the pandemic.Conclusions: Despite the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic, current accredited trainees remain well‐positioned to obtain proficiency and enter the work‐force.

Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has become widely adopted for the surgical removal of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with the most common locations being in the tonsil and base of tongue (BOT). However, it is currently unknown if TORS has equal efficacy and outcomes in patients with tonsillar or BOT OPSCC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the margin status and recurrence rates of tonsillar and BOT OPSCC after TORS. Per PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were systematically searched from inception to 2/28/2022. Articles including the surgical management of OPSCC with TORS that compared margin status, complications, and recurrence between tonsil and BOT were included. Meta-analyses of proportions and odds ratios were performed. A total of 28 studies were included, comprising 1769 patients with tonsillar OPSCC and 1139 patients with BOT OPSCC. HPV positivity was seen in 92.3% of tumors. BOT OPSCC had a higher rate of positive margins compared to tonsillar OPSCC (28.1% [95%CI 15.1–43.3] vs. 7.5% [95%CI 3.3–13.3]). No differences were seen in recurrence between BOT and tonsillar OPSCC (OR 1.1 [95%CI 0.8–1.5], p = 0.480). In addition, no differences in postoperative hemorrhage were seen between tonsillar and BOT OPSCC (10.7% [95%CI 6.1–16.5] vs. 8.8% [95% CI 1.5–21.3]). While a higher rate of positive margins was seen in BOT OPSCC when compared to tonsil OPSCC, this did not translate to a higher recurrence rate in the BOT group. Future research on which subset of patients with BOT is more likely to have positive margins is warranted to improve the utility of TORS further.

Introduction: Over the last several decades, transoral resection techniques for treatment of supraglottic lesions have become increasingly favored to reduce the need for either open transcervical resection or primary chemoradiation. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) offers advantages in visualization, dissection control, and access to remove bulky tumors en bloc. However, the management of the airway for these cases tends to vary, without clear guidelines as to when a tracheostomy is necessary. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transoral robotic supraglottic partial laryngectomy at a large academic center from May 2005 through December 2016 was performed. Airway management was examined, specifically as it pertains to whether a tracheostomy was performed at the time of surgery or otherwise. Demographic and tumor characteristics were also evaluated. Results: Sixty-three patients were included. Forty (63%) were male, the average age at surgery was 63.6, and the majority (90.5%) underwent resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottis. Thirty-nine patients (62%) underwent the procedure with standard endotracheal intubation using a wire-reinforced tube. Of these, four patients required subsequent tracheostomy- 2 for laryngeal edema postoperatively, one for airway management during a postoperative bleeding event, and one for laryngeal edema following initiation of adjuvant chemoradiation. Twenty patients (32%) underwent tracheostomy at the time of transoral resection for airway management, 17 of whom were decannulated an average of 12.2 weeks following surgery. Those who underwent tracheostomy at the time of surgery had a higher percentage of tumors involving multiple supraglottic subsites (p = 0.031), 85 vs. 54% in the group who did not undergo tracheostomy. No difference in age, BMI, clinical T-stage, or clinical N stage was found between the two groups. Conclusion: Performing a tracheostomy at the time of surgery should be considered for those patients with more extensive malignant disease (≥T2 tumors). While avoiding tracheostomy is often preferred by the patient, the maintenance of the patent airway peri-operatively should be first priority when considering airway management. Furthermore, as the majority of those patients receiving tracheostomy are decannulated within 4 months of surgery, the tracheostomy could be considered a short-term adjunct to the procedure.