Background: In maxillofacial reconstruction, even small inaccuracies can compromise aesthetics, function, and safety. Surgeons currently rely on preoperative imaging; however, recent advances in intraoperative imaging now provide three-dimensional, real-time guidance, possibly enhancing surgical outcomes. This review evaluates the current application of intraoperative imaging in maxillary and mandibular surgery including its impact on accuracy, efficiency, and outcomes. Methods: Two separate systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD420251125497, CRD420251124600), analyzing maxillary and mandibular repair were conducted through Cochrane, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Both reviews adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed intraoperative digital imaging or navigation in maxillary or mandibular surgery. Studies without human subjects, intraoperative imaging, or the surgery of interest were excluded. Bias was assessed with NIH Quality Assessment. Results: A combined total of 795 publications were screened, with 35 studies ultimately included in this review, encompassing 1643 patients. Techniques included intraoperative computed tomography (CT) (n = 12, 34.3%), stereotactic navigation (n = 16, 45.7%), augmented reality (n = 2, 5.7%), ultrasound, fluoroscopy, infrared stereoscopic and electromagnetic (n = 1, 2.9%, each). The most common indication for surgery was fracture repair. Reporting was heterogeneous, with variable metrics and reporting for accuracy, complications, and revisions. Overall, cone-beam CT (CBCT) and stereotactic navigation both demonstrated significant restoration of normal symmetry, and stereotactic navigation enabled accuracy of <2 mm. CBCT added the shortest amount of time intraoperatively, ranging from 1 to 20 min. Reporting on long-term outcomes was heterogeneous. Conclusions: A variety of intraoperative imaging and navigation techniques are being applied in maxillofacial surgery. However, inconsistent reporting metrics, small study size, and study feasibility-focused study design limit meaningful comparison across technologies. Rigorous prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to further define their clinical value and guide adoption.

Key Points: Patients testing positive for platelet factor 4 antibodies have a >50% higher odds of developing severe AKI compared with those who test negative. The relationship between platelet factor 4 antibodies and severe AKI was independent of demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and severity-of-illness characteristics. Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which results from production of antibodies that bind to heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes, is a hypercoagulable state associated with considerable morbidity and mortality due to thrombotic complications. We investigated whether PF4 antibodies are associated with an increased risk of AKI. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of hospitalized adults who underwent testing for PF4 antibodies at two large medical centers in Boston between 2015 and 2021. The primary exposure was PF4 test positivity. The primary outcome was severe AKI, defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 3 as a ≥3-fold increase in serum creatinine or receipt of KRT within 7 days after the PF4 test. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. Results: A total of 4224 patients were included in our analysis, 469 (11.1%) of whom had a positive PF4 test. Severe AKI occurred in 50 of 469 patients (10.7%) with a positive PF4 test and in 235 of 3755 patients (6.3%) with a negative test (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.79 [95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 2.47]). In multivariable analyses adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and severity-of-illness characteristics, PF4 test positivity remained associated with a higher risk of severe AKI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 2.20]). Conclusions: Among hospitalized adults, the presence of PF4 antibodies is independently associated with a 56% higher odds of developing severe AKI. Additional studies are needed to investigate potential mechanisms that may underlie these findings, such as pathogenic effects of PF4 antibodies on the microvasculature of the kidneys.

Aims: Health and social services are fundamental to public and population health, and disruptions can have devastating effects on individuals of all ages. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of health and social services rapidly changed. Existing resources experienced changes in operation and mode of service delivery, while new resources emerged to address escalating needs. Both the general public and service providers lacked access to accurate information on availability and access, and existing service directories became obsolete or unreliable. To address this gap, a committee of university students expanded its volunteer base, partnered with a local non-profit organization, and invested in maintaining a centralized, up-to-date resource directory for the region. Methods/Results: Student volunteers sourced and consolidated existing county-level directories to curate more than 370 resources across 12 healthcare and social care domains in a Google Sheets platform. This directory was publicly accessible, available in English and Spanish, adjustable to community feedback and needs, disseminated through the local health system intranet, synthesized into paper handouts for food pantries, and utilized to curate a directory aimed toward older adult needs. Students worked in a tiered leadership model and mobilized quickly to respond to immediate community needs. Conclusion: This academic–community partnership engaging student volunteers can be a low-cost, high-value resource to support public health systems meet the information needs of their community, particularly during periods of crisis or rapid changes in service availability.

Traumatic injuries often result in nerve tissue damage and functional deficits due to limited regeneration. Silk fibroin, a biopolymer with inherent biocompatibility and tunable properties, is a promising material for 3D-bioprinted neural tissue scaffolds. This review highlights recent advancements in silk-derived composite scaffolds, often incorporating additional materials like collagen or conductive polymers to enhance their performance. This review examines how material composition, scaffold architecture, and fabrication strategy influence biological response and functional recovery. This comprehensive review follows PRISMA guidelines and uses comprehensive searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published through 2025. Studies were screened for eligibility based on substance type, mechanical properties, production methods, and outcomes. Findings were synthesized qualitatively. Twelve studies were included, comprising rat (50%), canine (8.3%), and in vitro (41.7%) models. Analysis reveals that silk fibroin acts as a highly adaptable mechanical backbone. It can consistently integrate with bioactive additives (collagen, dECM) or conductive polymers (Polypyrrole, MXene) to meet specific therapeutic demands. For spinal cord injuries, composites reached a compressive modulus capable of resisting physiological pressures and preventing scaffold collapse. In soft tissue applications, silk–hydrogel blends provided localized release of exosomes and small molecules during the acute injury phase, reducing neuroinflammatory markers. Additionally, adding conductive materials allowed the scaffolds to bridge electrical gaps and promote Schwann cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, 3D bioprinting enabled the creation of defined microchannels that replicate native fascicular architecture. In vivo outcomes consistently showed superior axonal regeneration, myelination, and synaptic reconnection compared to controls, correlating with significant improvements in electrophysiological and motor function. This review highlights the clinical potential of silk fibroin-based 3D-printed biomaterials for nerve regeneration, including neural repair and neural tissue engineering. More recent studies place greater emphasis on integrating mechanical, architectural, and biological considerations into scaffold design, resulting in increasingly multifunctional scaffold systems. Despite promising efficacy, the heterogeneity of fabrication methods and the predominance of rodent models highlight the need for standardized protocols and evaluations in relevant models to facilitate clinical translation.