Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved that short-term (21–90 days) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the risk of early ischemic recurrences after a noncardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) without substantially increasing the hemorrhagic risk. We aimed at understanding whether and how real-world use of DAPT differs from RCTs. Methods: READAPT (Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or TIA) is a prospective cohort study including >18-year-old patients treated with DAPT after a noncardioembolic minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from 51 Italian centers. The study comprises a 90-day follow-up from symptom onset. In the present work, we reported descriptive statistics of baseline data of patients recruited up to July 31, 2022, and proportions of patients who would have been excluded from RCTs. We compared categorical data through the χ² test. Results: We evaluated 1070 patients, who had 72 (interquartile range, 62–79) years median age, were mostly Caucasian (1045; 97.7%), and were men (711; 66.4%). Among the 726 (67.9%) patients with ischemic stroke, 226 (31.1%) did not meet the RCT inclusion criteria because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 and 50 (6.9%) because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >5. Among the 344 (32.1%) patients with TIA, 69 (19.7%) did not meet the RCT criteria because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <4 and 252 (74.7%) because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score 24 hours) DAPT initiation; 776 (72.5%) and 676 (63.2%) patients did not take loading doses of aspirin and clopidogrel, respectively. Overall, 84 (7.8%) patients met the RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria. Conclusions: The real-world use of DAPT is broader than RCTs. Most patients did not meet the RCT criteria because of the severity of ischemic stroke, lower risk of TIA, late DAPT start, or lack of antiplatelet loading dose. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with recent ingestion of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a frequent challenge and remains controversial. The benefit of DOAC reversal before IVT is uncertain. METHODS: Using target trial methodology, we analyzed data from 28 comprehensive stroke centers. Patients on DOACs were included if they met IVT criteria, had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥2, and last DOAC intake within 48 hours or was undeterminable. Safety and efficacy outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, 90-day mortality, and good functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 or return to baseline]) were compared between those receiving IVT versus no IVT and IVT with versus without reversal. In addition, a comparison was made with patients from the New Zealand stroke registry, all of whom underwent reversal with idarucizumab. We adjusted for covariates known to be associated with safety and efficacy outcomes, including age, stroke severity, intended thrombectomy, blood glucose, blood pressure, DOAC reversal, and time from last intake. RESULTS: Overall, 1342 patients fulfilled the target trial criteria. The median age was 80 (interquartile range, 73–86) years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 11, 50% were female, and 52% of patients received endovascular therapy. IVT was given in 342 of 1342 (25%) patients. Of these, 141 (41.2%) had verified DOAC intake <12 hours before admission, and 92 (26.9%) within 12 to 24 hours. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 10 of 328 (3.0%) of patients receiving IVT and 54 of 921 (5.9%) patients not receiving IVT (adjusted difference, −2.1% [95% CI, −5.3% to +1.2]). Patients receiving IVT were more likely to have good functional outcomes (adjusted difference, +14.4% [95% CI, +7.1% to +21.8%]). Comparing 289 patients with reversal (from the additional New Zealand registry) and 283 patients without reversal before IVT (from the target trial population), there was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, or efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This target trial confirms previous observational data regarding the safety of off-label IVT in patients with recent DOAC intake. More data and dedicated trials are needed for patients with confirmed high DOAC plasma levels and regarding the efficacy and safety of DOAC reversal before IVT.

Background: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS. Methods and Results: This is a prespecified propensity score‐matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real‐world study (READAPT [Real‐Life Study on Short‐Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90‐day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90‐day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24‐hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2‐point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI −2.0% to 6.7%]; P =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98–1.08]; P =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41–0.79]; P <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24‐hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%–28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34–1.89]; both P <0.001) and lower 90‐day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08–0.90]; P =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes. Conclusions: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is a potentially preventable complication after exposure to iodinated contrast media. In patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the incidence and clinical impact are poorly characterized, and no validated prediction tool is currently available. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of CA-AKI in EVT-treated patients with AIS and to develop and validate a predictive score. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted involving EVT-treated patients across 73 centers in 16 countries (January-December 2023). Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, absence of dialysis, availability of preprocedural and 48-hour postprocedural creatinine levels, and available 90-day follow-up (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score). The primary outcome was CA-AKI, defined by KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria;creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥1.5 times baseline, within 48 hours). Secondary outcomes were (1) in-hospital mortality, (2) 90-day mRS score, and (3) 90-day severe disability or death (mRS score >3). Logistic models assessing associations with outcomes accounted for within-center clustering by applying robust standard errors. CA-AKI prediction models were developed across imputed data sets using univariable selection (p < 0.20), backward elimination (p < 0.05), and coefficient-based scoring after categorization of continuous predictors, with internal validation by bootstrap to obtain optimism-adjusted estimates. Among 6,638 patients (median age 74 years; 48.7% male), CA-AKI occurred in 326 (4.9%) and was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.269; 95% CI 1.615-3.190), higher 90-day mRS scores (adjusted common odds ratio 1.584; 95% CI 1.110-2.258), and 90-day severe disability or death (aOR 1.530; 95% CI 1.057-2.216). A preprocedural risk model including 12 routine clinical variables-sex, ethnicity, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, antiplatelet therapy, NIH Stroke Scale score at admission, serum glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, mean arterial pressure, and IV thrombolysis-demonstrated acceptable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.710 [95% CI 0.682-0.738]; precision-recall area under the curve 0.13 [95% CI 0.10-0.16]), good calibration (slope 0.870 [95% CI 0.759-0.928]), good overall performance (Brier score 0.045 [95% CI 0.042-0.049]). A second model that included EVT-related variables (e.g., contrast volume) showed similar performances. In this large, international cohort, CA-AKI occurred in approximately 1 in 20 EVT-treated patients with AIS and was independently associated with poor outcomes. A simple preprocedural risk score enables early identification of high-risk individuals and may support preventive strategies.