Ping Jiang

Dr. Ping Jiang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
SKSelenge Khishgee
Selenge Khishgee
AAAdila Alimujiang
Adila Alimujiang
HDHongjia Dong
Hongjia Dong

27 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XYXiaohui Yang
Xiaohui Yang
XYXinyu Yang
Xinyu Yang
JZJingan Zhu
Jingan Zhu
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
HLHuaxing Lin
Huaxing Lin
JLJingyi Long
Jingyi Long

26 February 2021 in Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLili Du
Lili Du
HZHaijun Zhao
Haijun Zhao
HTHaoyue Tang
Haoyue Tang
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
MWMa Weichun
Ma Weichun

1 April 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHarry Den Hartog
Harry Den Hartog
FSFrans Sengers
Frans Sengers
YXYe Xu
Ye Xu
LXLinjun Xie
Linjun Xie
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
Martin De JongMartin De Jong
Martin De Jong

26 March 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HZHaijun Zhao
Haijun Zhao
MWMa Weichun
Ma Weichun
HDHongjia Dong
Hongjia Dong
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
China is now facing great challenges resulting from climate change and air pollution, driven by the processes of industrialization and urbanization. Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions produced by the coal-fired power industry represent approximately 70% of the total emissions in China’s industrial sector. In this study, 39 coal-fired power plants built in China between 2014 and 2015 were analyzed in regards to the co-effects oncarbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions generated directly and indirectly by end-of-pipe measures of pollution control. After completing the quantitative analysis with input data from 83units of power plants, we found that co-effects were positive only for air pollutant reductions through the implementation of desulfurization, denitrification, and dedusting measures, but co-effects were negative for carbon dioxide production because of the corresponding electricity use and chemical reactions that led to the increases in carbon dioxide emissions. We also performed an assessment of the synergistic coefficients to better understand the degree of co-effects. It will be important for researchers to take a comprehensive view of China’s coal-fired power plants and look for solutions that can maximize positive co-effects and achieve overall co-benefits of reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants.

21 May 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBiao Hu
Biao Hu
HDHongjia Dong
Hongjia Dong
PJPing Jiang
Ping Jiang
Jingan ZhuJingan Zhu
Jingan Zhu
Faced with increasing conflicts between economic and environmental development, it is extremely urgent to promote the green growth of enterprises. As an incentive environmental regulation measure, an environmental tax has been proven to effectively alleviate environmental problems and reduce corporate pollutant emissions. From the perspective of environmental tax equity and efficiency, this study collects more than 100,000 enterprises’ pollutant-discharge and pollutant-discharge fee data from 4300 pollutant disposal enterprises in Yunnan Province, China in 2017. The study analyzes the marginal abatement cost (MAC) of water pollution and air pollution in key industries by using the MAC accounting method. Under the three scenarios of low, medium and high tax rates set by the study, the study evaluates the applicable tax rates of environmental tax of enterprises under different tax rates. The main findings of the study are: (1) the MAC of pollutants in various industries is quite different in different industries; (2) the environmental tax rate of 2018 is generally low and is not enough to encourage enterprises to reduce more pollution; (3) most enterprises will not invest a large amount of funds to carry out technological transformation for green production, without the government’s mandatory environmental regulation measure. The study recommends that the government needs to increase the environmental tax rate, gradually approach the cost of corporate pollutant-treatment and force the technological transformation of enterprises. At the same time, the government itself needs to do a good job of tax neutrality, increase the compensation for environmental protection behaviors of enterprises, and encourage green development of enterprises. Finally, the taxation supervision should be strengthened, and the tax violations of enterprises should be checked strictly for avoidance of tax cuts against rules.