Emanuela Gionfriddo

Prof. Emanuela Gionfriddo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2017 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NRNathaly Reyes-Garcés
Nathaly Reyes-Garcés
Emanuela GionfriddoEmanuela Gionfriddo
Emanuela Gionfriddo
GGGerman Augusto Gómez-Ríos
German Augusto Gómez-Ríos
NANazmul Alam
Nazmul Alam
EBEzel Boyacı
Ezel Boyacı
JPJanusz Pawliszyn
Janusz Pawliszyn
Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is a versatile, non-exhaustive sample preparation tool that has been demonstrated to be well-suited for facile and effective analysis of a broad range of compounds in a plethora of studies. A growing number of reports describing diverse SPME workflows for novel investigations in a variety of fields, such as flavor and fragrance investigations, environmental studies, and diverse bioanalytical applications, among others, corroborate the applicability of this microextraction tool in the analytical sciences

1 September 2015 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÉSÉrica A. Souza-Silva
Érica A. Souza-Silva
RJRuifen Jiang
Ruifen Jiang
ARAngel Rodríguez-Lafuente
Angel Rodríguez-Lafuente
Emanuela GionfriddoEmanuela Gionfriddo
Emanuela Gionfriddo
JPJanusz Pawliszyn
Janusz Pawliszyn

28 October 2023 in Journal of Separation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMadison L. Williams
Madison L. Williams
AOAghogho Abigail Olomukoro
Aghogho Abigail Olomukoro
RERonald V. Emmons
Ronald V. Emmons
NGNipunika H. Godage
Nipunika H. Godage
Emanuela GionfriddoEmanuela Gionfriddo
Emanuela Gionfriddo
Matrix effects can significantly impede the accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability of separation techniques presenting a formidable challenge to the analytical process. It is crucial to address matrix effects to achieve accurate and precise measurements in complex matrices. The multifaceted nature of matrix effects which can be influenced by factors such as target analyte, sample preparation protocol, composition, and choice of instrument necessitates a pragmatic approach when analyzing complex matrices. This review aims to highlight common challenges associated with matrix effects throughout the entire analytical process with emphasis on gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry, and sample preparation techniques. These techniques are susceptible to matrix effects that could lead to ion suppression/enhancement or impact the analyte signal at various stages of the analytical workflow. The assessment, quantification, and mitigation of matrix effects are necessary in developing any analytical method. Strategies can be implemented to reduce or eliminate the matrix effect by changing the type of ionization, improving extraction and clean‐up methods, optimization of chromatography conditions, and corrective calibration methods. While development of an effective strategy to completely mitigate matrix effects remains elusive, an integrated approach that combines sample preparation, analytical extraction, and effective instrumental analysis remains the most promising avenue for identifying and resolving matrix effects.

1 September 2015 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÉSÉrica A. Souza-Silva
Érica A. Souza-Silva
Emanuela GionfriddoEmanuela Gionfriddo
Emanuela Gionfriddo
JPJanusz Pawliszyn
Janusz Pawliszyn

1 August 2020 in Analytica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNipunika H. Godage
Nipunika H. Godage
Emanuela GionfriddoEmanuela Gionfriddo
Emanuela Gionfriddo