Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn

Prof. Dr. Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 March 2004 in Statistica Neerlandica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMarijtje A.j. Van Duijn
Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn
TSTom A. B. Snijders
Tom A. B. Snijders
BZBonne J. H. Zijlstra
Bonne J. H. Zijlstra


1 April 2003 in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMarijtje A.j. Van Duijn
Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn
EZEvelien P. H. Zeggelink
Evelien P. H. Zeggelink
MHMark Huisman
Mark Huisman
FSFrans N. Stokman
Frans N. Stokman
FWFrans W. Wasseur
Frans W. Wasseur
In this paper we both describe and analyze the meeting process and the evolution of a friendship network among sociology freshmen in the Netherlands. We develop a theory that explains how changes in the network structure depend on one or more of four main effects: proximity, visible similarity, invisible similarity, and network opportunity. We formulate expectations with regard to what factors are important at what stages of the friendship development, making a distinction between 'meeting' and 'mating.' To some extent, the results confirm our expectations. The proximity and visible similarity variables determine change in network structure in the early stages, whereas network opportunity is important during all stages. Unfortunately, no significant effects of invisible similarity are found.

1 April 1999 in Social Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMarijtje A.j. Van Duijn
Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn
JBJooske T van Busschbach
Jooske T van Busschbach
TSTom A.B Snijders
Tom A.B Snijders

25 April 2014 in Development and Psychopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GHGijs Huitsing
Gijs Huitsing
TSTom A. B. Snijders
Tom A. B. Snijders
MDMarijtje A.j. Van Duijn
Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn
RVRené Veenstra
René Veenstra
The complex interplay between bullying/victimization and defending was examined using a longitudinal social network approach (stochastic actor-based models). The (co)evolution of these relations within three elementary schools (Grades 2–5 at Time 1, ages 8–11,N= 354 children) was investigated across three time points within a year. Most bullies and defenders were in the same grade as the victims, although a substantial number of bullies and defenders were in other grades (most often one grade higher). Defenders were usually of the same gender as the victims, whereas most bullies were boys, with boys bullying both boys and girls. In line with goal-framing theory, multiplex network analyses provided evidence for the social support hypothesis (victims with the same bullies defended each other over time) as well as the retaliation hypothesis (defenders run the risk of becoming victimized by the bullies of the victims they defend). In addition, the analysis revealed that bullies with the same victims defended each other over time and that defenders of bullies initiated harassment of those bullies' victims. This study can be seen as a starting point in unraveling the relationship dynamics among bullying, victimization, and defending networks in schools.

1 July 1999 in Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GBGerhard G. Van De Bunt
Gerhard G. Van De Bunt
MDMarijtje A.j. Van Duijn
Marijtje A.j. Van Duijn
TSTom A.B. Snijders
Tom A.B. Snijders