Asim Kumar Naskar

Dr. Asim Kumar Naskar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2017 in IET Control Theory & Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSudipta Chakraborty
Sudipta Chakraborty
SGSandip Ghosh
Sandip Ghosh
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar
An integral–proportional derivative (I–PD) control strategy for integrating plus time‐delay processes is proposed. The proposed scheme consists of an inner PD loop and an outer I‐loop for taking care of the servo as well as the regulatory action. Explicit formulas for tuning of the proposed controller are derived in terms of gain margin, phase margin and critical gain. Moreover, pole‐placement and frequency loop‐shaping design methods are also explored for designing the I–PD controller. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed I–PD controller over conventional P/PI/PID ones for integrating processes. The design is also validated through experiments on a temperature control process.

21 February 2023 in International Journal of Systems Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDipjyoti Das
Dipjyoti Das
SCSudipta Chakraborty
Sudipta Chakraborty
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar
Chemical reactors, heat exchangers, level-loops, and distillation columns are commonly encountered in the chemical process industry, and these are having a significant role in the functioning of any chemical process. For the smooth and efficient functioning of any such process, a robust control law design is an important work to be considered. In this paper, a modified 2DOF robust PID control law has been developed to ensure satisfactory performance in both the step and ramp type references and disturbances. Controller parameters are derived with Maximum sensitivity, Gain, and Phase margin specifications. Case studies with different chemical processes like CSTR, distillation column, heat exchangers, and boiler drum level-loop are included for both the nominal and perturbed cases. Lastly, a performance comparison of ISE (Integral of square error), ITAE (Integral time absolute error), IAE (Integral absolute error), and Total variation (TV) of the control signal is also included.

1 May 2017 in ISA Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSudipta Chakraborty
Sudipta Chakraborty
SGSandip Ghosh
Sandip Ghosh
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar

6 March 2023 in Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBala Bhaskar Duddeti
Bala Bhaskar Duddeti
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar
KSK. R. Subhashini
K. R. Subhashini

5 April 2019 in IET Control Theory & Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPradosh Ranjan Sahoo
Pradosh Ranjan Sahoo
JGJitendra Kumar Goyal
Jitendra Kumar Goyal
SGSandip Ghosh
Sandip Ghosh
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar
This study addresses the design of static output feedback (SOF) controller for continuous time linear systems. New sufficient conditions are derived for designing SOF controllers. The development involves suitable decomposition of Lyapunov matrices and deriving linear matrix inequality (LMI) criterion that ensures performance. LMI criteria for pole placement in the LMI region are also derived. The proposed criteria can be used for restricted SOF controller design effectively. Several numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed results.

18 February 2022 in IETE Journal of Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSudipta Chakraborty
Sudipta Chakraborty
JSJiwanjot Singh
Jiwanjot Singh
ANAsim Kumar Naskar
Asim Kumar Naskar
SGSandip Ghosh
Sandip Ghosh
In many industrial processes, e.g. temperature and level control, chemical reactors can be classified as a variant of integrating plus time-delay system. Controlling these processes is a difficult task due to open-loop instability, which consists of time-delay and unbounded output for bounded input. 1DOF PID control always leads to a large overshoot in set-point tracking for IPTD processes. In a 2DOF PID structure, tuning the set-point weights and the controller parameters is important to achieve good tracking and disturbance rejection properties. But tuning the set-point weights and the parameters of the cascade-feedback controller together is a difficult task. Usually, predetermined values for set-points are chosen, and a controller design is followed. In the present work, an alternative simple approach to obtain controller parameters along with set-point weights is presented which are tuned to yield good tracking and load–disturbance rejection. Explicit controller parameters for different classes of integrating processes are obtained using gain-margin, phase-margin, and inverse plant model which can also be used for controller auto-tuning. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed controller, simulation comparisons with some recently developed methods are included. Moreover, the experimental validation of the proposed controller on a temperature control plant is also presented.