Maciej Lisiewicz

Dr. Maciej Lisiewicz

Department of Geomatics, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Pruszków, Mazowieckie, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Agnieszka KamińskaAgnieszka Kamińska
Agnieszka Kamińska
Maciej LisiewiczMaciej Lisiewicz
Maciej Lisiewicz
Krzysztof StereńczakKrzysztof Stereńczak
Krzysztof Stereńczak
BKBartłomiej Kraszewski
Bartłomiej Kraszewski
RSRafał Sadkowski
Rafał Sadkowski

1 October 2021 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAgnieszka Kamińska
Agnieszka Kamińska
Maciej LisiewiczMaciej Lisiewicz
Maciej Lisiewicz
BKBartłomiej Kraszewski
Bartłomiej Kraszewski
KSKrzysztof Stereńczak
Krzysztof Stereńczak

10 April 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maciej LisiewiczMaciej Lisiewicz
Maciej Lisiewicz
Agnieszka KamińskaAgnieszka Kamińska
Agnieszka Kamińska
BKBartłomiej Kraszewski
Bartłomiej Kraszewski
Krzysztof StereńczakKrzysztof Stereńczak
Krzysztof Stereńczak
Individual tree detection algorithms (ITD) are used to obtain accurate information about trees. Following the process of individual tree detection, it is possible to use additional processing tools to determine tree parameters such as tree height, crown base height, crown volume, or stem volume. However, many of the methods developed so far have focused on parameterising the algorithms based on the study area, height structure or tree species analysed. Applying the parameters of the method can be challenging in areas with dense and heterogeneous forests with a diverse stand structure. Therefore, this work aimed to develop a method to correct the results of ITD algorithms to identify individual trees more reliably, taking into account different ITD methods based on the Canopy Height Model. In the present study, we proposed a three-step approach to correct segmentation errors. In the first step, erroneous (under- and over-segmentation errors) and correct segments were classified. After classification, the second step was to refine the under-segmentation errors. The final step was to merge segments from the over-segmentation class with correct segments based on the specified conditions. The study was conducted in one of the most complex and diverse forest communities in Europe, making tree identification a major challenge. The accuracy of the segmentation improvements varied depending on the method applied and tree species group examined. Thus, based on the results, the paper advocates for the correction method due to its efficiency in mixed forest stands. Therefore, the present study offers a possible solution to reduce segmentation errors by considering different forest types and different CHM-based ITD methods for identifying individual trees.

15 December 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Agnieszka KamińskaAgnieszka Kamińska
Agnieszka Kamińska
Maciej LisiewiczMaciej Lisiewicz
Maciej Lisiewicz
Krzysztof StereńczakKrzysztof Stereńczak
Krzysztof Stereńczak
Tree species classification is important for a variety of environmental applications, including biodiversity monitoring, wildfire risk assessment, ecosystem services assessment, and sustainable forest management. In this study we used a fusion of three remote sensing (RM) datasets including ALS (leaf-on and leaf-off) and colour-infrared (CIR) imagery (leaf-on), to classify different coniferous and deciduous tree species, including dead class, in a mixed temperate forest in Poland. We used intensity and structural variables from the ALS data and spectral information derived from aerial imagery for the classification procedure. Additionally, we tested the differences in classification accuracy of all the variants included in the data integration. The random forest classifier was used in the study. The highest accuracies were obtained for classification based on both point clouds and including image spectral information. The mean values for overall accuracy and kappa were 84.3% and 0.82, respectively. Analysis of the leaf-on and leaf-off alone is not sufficient to identify individual tree species due to their different discriminatory power. Leaf-on and leaf-off ALS point cloud features alone gave the lowest accuracies of 72% ≤ OA ≤ 74% and 0.67 ≤ κ ≤ 0.70. Classification based on both point clouds was found to give satisfactory and comparable results to classification based on combined information from all three sources (83% ≤ OA ≤ 84% and 0.81 ≤ κ ≤ 0.82). The classification accuracy varied between species. The classification results for coniferous trees were always better than for deciduous trees independent of the datasets. In the classification based on both point clouds (leaf-on and leaf-off), the intensity features seemed to be more important than the other groups of variables, especially the coefficient of variation, skewness, and percentiles. The NDVI was the most important CIR-based feature.

27 January 2026 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JTJosef Taher
Josef Taher
EHEric Hyyppä
Eric Hyyppä
MHMatti Hyyppä
Matti Hyyppä
KSKlaara Salolahti
Klaara Salolahti
XYXiaowei Yu
Xiaowei Yu
JHJuha Hyyppä
Juha Hyyppä

1 November 2020 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAgnieszka Kamińska
Agnieszka Kamińska
Maciej LisiewiczMaciej Lisiewicz
Maciej Lisiewicz
BKBartłomiej Kraszewski
Bartłomiej Kraszewski
Krzysztof StereńczakKrzysztof Stereńczak
Krzysztof Stereńczak