Mangrove ecosystems are extremely sensitive to compounded stress, as evidenced by the widespread degradation and mortality of the pioneer mangrove species Avicennia marina along the Guangxi coast in recent years. However, research on how mangrove ecosystems respond to compound biotic stressors remains limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically examine the ecological response mechanisms of A. marina under dual threats from the burrowing isopod Sphaeroma terebrans and the defoliating moth Hyblaea puera. Two contrasting sites were selected: Guchengling (subject to chronic stem-boring and sudden defoliator outbreaks) and Tieshangang (free from compounded stress). Photosynthetic capacity, metabolic function, and root structural integrity were all compromised considerably by chronic boring stress. During insect outbreaks, 15.33 ha of mangroves were destroyed due to impairments that breached the ecological threshold. In contrast, the healthier Tieshangang community exhibited strong ecological resilience, with rapid green canopy regeneration following defoliation and notable recovery in the normalized difference vegetation index. To enable early identification and precise intervention in mangrove decline, a comprehensive health index model was developed that includes root–canopy coordination, root length, and boring density. Field validation results, showing 100% agreement with expert evaluations across 19 validation sites (Cohen’s κ = 1.0), confirmed the high accuracy of the model. This study highlights the importance of identifying sensitive zones and undertaking timely ecological restoration, thereby providing a scientific basis and a practical tool that could facilitate early warning and timely management of mangrove degradation events.

Blue carbon ecosystems are critical biodiversity hotspots facing escalating threats. Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP) is a key policy tool for protecting their biodiversity and enhancing ecosystem services, resilience, climate action, and sustainable development. We performed a systematic bibliometric analysis (1981–2025) using the Web of Science Core Collection. The results indicated that global CMSP–blue carbon ecosystems collaborative research exhibits a three-stage evolutionary pattern: the initial phase (2008–2012) of blue carbon concept introduction; the development phase (2013–2018), where research focus shifted to carbon sinks and ecology driven by policy initiatives; and the growth phase (2019–2025), where research focused on precision systematic governance. Research has evolved from baseline ecosystem assessments to policy governance integration, which emerged as a core component of Marine Spatial Planning to advance sustainable development. Research networks exhibit a “center–periphery” pattern. However, the international influence of China’s research output remains limited. Future CMSP collaborative governance will require refining planning frameworks, addressing regional technical adaptation challenges, and establishing a multidimensional policy system to reconcile the effective conservation of blue carbon ecosystems in order to reconcile biodiversity, resilience, and sustainable development. This study maps the CMSP–blue carbon ecosystems research landscape, informing improved climate-friendly marine and coastal spatial planning for enhanced coastal wetland biodiversity and ecological resilience.