Abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity constantly threaten food security. Biochar as a soil amendment has the potential to ameliorate soil and alleviate drought and salinity stress. Multiple studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of biochar in alleviating independent drought or salinity stress. However, the potential of biochar in mitigating the combined drought and salinity stress on plants has not been studied so far. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted in the climate-controlled chamber with the objective to investigate the effect of biochar on growth, physiology, and yield of quinoa under independent and combined drought and salinity stress. Quinoa plants were subjected to three irrigation treatments i.e., full irrigation (FI), deficit irrigation (DI), and alternate root-zone drying irrigation (ARD), two saline water treatments (0 and 400 mM) and two levels of biochar (0% and 5% by weight). In the FI treatment, plants were irrigated daily to maintain pot water-holding capacity. In limited irrigation treatments, 70% water of FI was applied either to the whole pot in DI or to one side of the pot alternating in ARD, respectively. The results showed that combined drought and salinity stress drastically affected growth and performance of quinoa compared to the independent drought or salinity stress. However, soil amendment with biochar had positive effect in mitigating both independent and combined effect of drought and salinity on quinoa plants. Furthermore, biochar amendment in ARD under salinity significantly enhanced plant height, shoot biomass, and grain by 11.7%, 18.8%, and 10.2% as compared with DI under salinity, respectively. In addition, leaf photosynthetic rate (A_n) and stomatal conductance (g_s) decreased under limited saline irrigation. Moreover, the interactive effect of biochar and ARD efficiently adjusted the balance between chemical signal (leaf ABA) and hydraulic signal (leaf water potential). Thus, intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE_i) and yield in ARD were significantly enhanced compared to DI, especially under salinity stress. Overall, biochar in combination with ARD might be a wise approach for sustaining crop productivity in salt affected and drought stressed areas of the world to ensure food security.

To construct a controllable turbulence environment, experiments on a double-layer oscillating grid were conducted using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Two-dimensional velocity fields were obtained using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) over oscillation frequencies of 1–6 Hz and strokes of 4, 6, and 8 cm. Mean velocities, RMS velocity fluctuations, Reynolds shear stress, and power spectral densities were subsequently analyzed. The mean velocity in the central region of Window II was generally close to zero. A central 10 cm × 10 cm area was therefore selected as the working region for flow-statistics analysis and turbulence-intensity calibration. As the horizontal and vertical root-mean-square (RMS) velocity fluctuations differed in magnitude, their relationships with the grid operating parameters were established separately. Under the analyzed operating condition, the integral timescale of the horizontal velocity fluctuations in the central working region was approximately 0.846 s. The dimensionless spectral analysis further characterized the frequency distributions of velocity fluctuations at different measurement locations. This study provides a basis for apparatus calibration and a reference for setting operating conditions for subsequent laboratory experiments on fine-grained sediment flocculation and settling under controlled turbulence conditions.

Hooked-head spur dikes are a specialized type of spur dike, where their geometry significantly influences flow diversion, sediment transport, and bank protection. This study establishes a three-dimensional numerical model utilizing the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence closure and the volume of fluid (VOF) method to explore the effects of hook angle (90°, 120°, and 150°) and hook-length ratio (L/D = 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4) on the flow structure surrounding a hooked-head spur dike. The study comprises nine simulation cases, and the distributions of mainstream velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are analyzed. The results demonstrate that a hook angle of 120° yields the greatest increase in the mean dimensionless mainstream velocity (V*), corresponding to enhancements of 4.26% and 9.09% relative to the angles of 90° and 150°, respectively. When the hook angle is fixed at 120°, increasing the hook length enhances the mainstream velocity; specifically, at L/D = 1/2, the mean V* increases by 10.58% and 14.64% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. Meanwhile, the TKE in the downstream recirculation zone decreases as either the hook angle or the hook length increases. At a hook angle of 90°, the mean dimensionless TKE (E*) is 8.80% and 10.65% higher than at 120° and 150°, respectively. For a fixed hook angle of 120°, the mean E* at L/D = 1/2 decreases by 3.46% and 9.35% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. In summary, the appropriate selection of hook angle and hook length can effectively guide flow toward the channel center, increase conveyance capacity, and enhance hydraulic performance for river regulation.