The care needs of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their families are frequently approached as if they were identical to those of adults, overlooking the distinct challenges young people may face. It has been stated that children and adolescents often find conventional conversations with diabetes specialists tiresome and unpleasant. The present study focuses on familial experiences of an advanced carbohydrate counting program tailored to children and adolescents. The data encompass semi-structured interviews with families who participated in a group-based child-centered advanced carbohydrate counting program. The analysis revealed five themes: (1) peer-to-peer interaction is an essential determinant of sharing and learning; (2) illness perception significantly influences dietary intake; (3) normalization of diabetes in everyday life eases the disease burden; (4) repetition of dietary knowledge is important for retention; and (5) creating a safe and playful learning environment is crucial to engaging children and adolescents in their own treatment. The present findings suggest that it would be beneficial to explore and consider alternative teaching approaches that are adapted to a more interactive and engaging learning environment that is specifically tailored to children and adolescents. This entails moving away from traditional individual approaches.

We aimed to evaluate the glycemic effect and detect any predictors of improved time-in-range (TIR) in persons with type 1 diabetes after initiating hybrid closed-loop (HCL) treatment with MiniMed 670G in a 12-month retrospective observational study. Before starting HCL treatment, the 62 participants followed a Steno-developed training program; 7 participants (6.5%) discontinued the HCL therapy; the remaining 55 (58% female) had an age (mean ± standard deviation) of 45.6 ± 12.6 years and diabetes duration of 28.2 ± 10.9 years. After 12 months' HCL therapy, glycated hemoglobin A1c decreased from 7.4% +0.7% to 7.1% +0.5%, TIR increased from 59.3% ± 13.5% to 72% ± 9.3%, time in 54–70 mg/dL (3.0–3.9 mM) decreased from 2.4% ± 2.0% to 1.4% ± 1.0%, and time in 180–250 mg/dL (10.0–13.9 mM) decreased from 26.4% ± 8.3% to 20.8% ± 5.5%, all P < 0.001. Improvement in TIR was significantly associated with lower total daily insulin dose, higher amount of total carbohydrate, and more time spent in Auto Mode. Our findings support the promising results on glycemic outcomes seen with HCL treatment.

Background/Objectives: Effective glycemic management from the time of diagnosis is essential in the care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D), as early glycemic patterns can influence long-term health outcomes. Methods: This exploratory study evaluated a one-month interactive, group- and play-based education program designed to enhance food and carbohydrate counting skills among families of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed (ND) T1D ( 7.5% (58 mmol/mol)). The intervention included hands-on learning activities in food and carbohydrate counting, and peer interaction to support development of diabetes self-management skills. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at six-months follow-up through medical records, glucose sensor data, and a questionnaire assessing diabetes self-management skills, dietary practices, and carbohydrate counting. Results: Between September 2022 and April 2024, 55 children and adolescents were enrolled in the ND group and 22 in the SGC group. Post-intervention, carbohydrate counting skills improved, particularly in the ND group. Participants reported greater confidence and independence in carbohydrate counting and insulin dosing, with parents noting sustained benefits at six-months follow-up. No significant changes were observed in glycemic control, including time-in-range and postprandial glucose profiles. Conclusions: In this exploratory study, early interactive and play-based group education was associated with improvements in carbohydrate counting skills and self-care confidence in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed T1D. These improvements were not accompanied by changes in glycemic outcomes. The findings occurred during a complex and transitional phase following diagnosis. Further research is needed to examine sustainability and long-term clinical impact.