Background: Upper lip appearance received major attention with the introduction of diverse treatment modalities, including lip augmentation, rhinoplasty surgery, and dental treatment designed to support the upper lip. Our objectives were to define the prevalence and characteristics of the upper lip horizontal line (ULHL), which is a dynamic line appearing during a smile, in relation to gender, malocclusions, aging, and facial morphology. Methods: First, the prevalence and gender distribution of ULHL was examined from standardized en-face imaging at full smile of 643 randomly selected patients. Second, cephalometric and dental cast model analyses were made for 97 consecutive patients divided into three age groups. Results: ULHL appears in 13.8% of the population examined, and prevailed significantly more in females (78%). The prevalence of ULHL was not related to age nor to malocclusion. Patients presenting ULHL showed shorter upper lip and deeper lip sulcus. The skeletal pattern showed longer mid-face, shorter lower facial height and greater prevalence of a gummy smile. Conclusions: Female patients with short upper lip, concavity of the upper lip, and gummy smile are more likely to exhibit ULHL. The ULHL is not age-related and can be identified in children and young adults. Therefore, it should be considered when selecting diverse treatment modalities involving the upper lip.

Age determination is important for forensic evaluation and for determining criminal responsibility. Based on the development of permanent teeth, the Demirjian staging evaluation key is commonly used in research for estimating age using teeth developmental stage. The purpose of the current study was to correlate the dental developmental age of third molar teeth with the chronological age of adolescent patients. This study evaluated 324 panorex images of Israeli patients aged 8–21 years with known birth dates and genders. The dental developmental stage was compared to the patient’s chronological age by gender and side (right/left and upper/lower jaws). This study also attempted to predict the patient’s age using the third molar developmental stage. The study included 179 male and 145 female patients. There was no statistical difference between the right and left sides of the upper or lower teeth. A strong correlation was found between third molar development and chronological age for both the maxilla and mandible. In 100% of cases, patients in developmental stage >5 were over 12 years old in the maxilla and in 97% of cases, were over 12 years old in the mandible. Patients in developmental stage >6 were over 14 years old in 100% of cases in both the maxilla and mandible. Patients in developmental stage >7 were over 16 years old in 100% of cases in both the maxilla and mandible. This study found that third molars can be used to accurately estimate age in a narrow age range, with a strong correlation between third molar development and chronological age. Further research may be needed to understand the utility of this method and its possible usage in different countries around the world.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence of complications and failures associated with impacted canine eruption in a specialized referral center, with the goal of identifying factors that contribute to these outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included cases of impacted canines treated at the School of Dental Medicine between 2010 and 2020. Clinical and radiographic data were collected and evaluated for failures and complications by two independent clinicians (MK, MG). In addition, specialists in oral and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics (YM, TS, NS) independently assessed all complications and failures. Results: Among the 214 impacted maxillary canines included, 23 (10.7%) failed to erupt following initial surgical–orthodontic treatment and required re-intervention. Eruption difficulty was attributed to orthodontic factors in 43.5% of cases, surgical factors in 13.0%, and combined factors in the remainder. Following a second procedure, 15 canines erupted successfully, while 8 did not, resulting in an overall failure rate of 3.7%. Treatment failure was significantly associated with both anatomical and procedural factors. Canines with centrally positioned crowns exhibited a significantly higher failure rate than those with buccal or palatal positions (χ² test, p = 0.025). Failure was also more common when the canine root apex was located in close proximity to a cortical plate. Lateral incisor root resorption was significantly associated with treatment complications (p = 0.030). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, root resorption remained an independent predictor of treatment failure, increasing the odds of failure approximately fourfold (OR = 0.255, CI = 0.077–0.843, p = 0.025). Timing and surgical technique were also significantly associated with treatment outcome. Surgical exposure performed shortly after diagnosis was linked to an increased risk of treatment complications (p = 0.006). Closed surgical exposure demonstrated a significantly higher failure rate compared with open exposure (Pearson exact test, p = 0.009). Although open exposure was associated with a greater likelihood of successful eruption, it was also significantly associated with increased gingival morbidity (Fisher’s test, p = 0.030). Conclusions: Failure of impacted maxillary canine eruption following combined surgical–orthodontic treatment is uncommon but is significantly associated with distinct anatomical and procedural risk factors. Central crown position, cortical plate involvement, lateral incisor root resorption, early surgical exposure, and the use of closed exposure techniques all increase the likelihood of treatment failure and complications. Although open exposure enhances the probability of successful eruption, it may also negatively affect gingival outcomes, underscoring the need for individualized, multidisciplinary treatment planning.