Georgia Piggot

Dr. Georgia Piggot

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2018 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PEPeter Erickson
Peter Erickson
MLMichael Lazarus
Michael Lazarus
GPGeorgia Piggot
Georgia Piggot

12 July 2013 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGemma Burford
Gemma Burford
EHElona Hoover
Elona Hoover
IVIsmael Velasco
Ismael Velasco
SJSvatava Janouskova
Svatava Janouskova
AJAlicia Jimenez-Elizondo
Alicia Jimenez-Elizondo
MHMarie Harder
Marie Harder
This paper argues that the need for a core “fourth pillar” of sustainability/sustainable development, as demanded in multiple arenas, can no longer be ignored on the grounds of intangibility. Different approaches to this vital but missing pillar (cultural-aesthetic, religious-spiritual, and political-institutional) find common ground in the area of ethical values. While values and aspects based on them are widely assumed to be intangible and immeasurable, we illustrate that it is possible to operationalize them in terms of measurable indicators when they are intersubjectively conceptualized within clearly defined practical contexts. The processes require contextual localization of items, which can nonetheless fit into a generalizable framework. This allows useful measurements to be made, and removes barriers to studying, tracking, comparing, evaluating and correlating values-related dimensions of sustainability. It is advocated that those involved in operationalizing sustainability (especially in the context of creating post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals), should explore the potential for developing indicators to capture some of its less tangible aspects, especially those concerned with ethical values.

8 December 2017 in Climate Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGeorgia Piggot
Georgia Piggot
Mounting evidence suggests that a large portion of the world's fossil fuel reserves will have to remain in the ground to prevent dangerous climate change. Yet, the fossil fuel industry continues to invest in new infrastructure to expand fuel supply. There appears to be a prevailing logic that extraction is inevitable, in spite of growing climate change concerns. Few political leaders seem to be willing to challenge this logic. The absence of adequate political action on climate change has sparked a burgeoning social movement focused on constraining fossil fuel supply. This article describes this movement, and explores the role that social mobilization may play in enabling policies that limit fossil fuel extraction. Drawing from literature on social mobilization and political change, this work: (1) discusses some of the social and political barriers to mobilization focused on restricting fossil fuel supply; (2) describes the pathways through which mobilization efforts may influence climate policy; and (3) highlights insights from studies of successful social movements that have relevance for the issue of fossil fuel extraction. The article concludes with directions for future research on social mobilization focused on supply-side climate policy. Key policy insights

1 September 2020 in Climate Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGeorgia Piggot
Georgia Piggot
CVCleo Verkuijl
Cleo Verkuijl
HAHarro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt
MLMichael Lazarus
Michael Lazarus
(2020). Curbing fossil fuel supply to achieve climate goals. Climate Policy: Vol. 20, Special Issue: Curbing Fossil Fuel Supply to Achieve Climate Goals, pp. 881-887.

12 July 2018 in Climate Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGeorgia Piggot
Georgia Piggot
PEPeter Erickson
Peter Erickson
HAHarro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt
MLMichael Lazarus
Michael Lazarus
Reducing fossil fuel supply is necessary to meet the Paris Agreement goal to keep warming ‘well below 2°C’, yet the Agreement is silent on the topic of fossil fuels. This article outlines reasons why it is important that Parties to the Agreement find ways to more explicitly address the phasing out of fossil fuel production under the UNFCCC. It describes how countries aiming to keep fossil fuel supply in line with Paris goals could articulate and report their actions within the current architecture of the Agreement. It also outlines specific mechanisms of the Paris Agreement through which issues related to the curtailment of fossil fuel supply can be addressed. Mapping out a transition away from fossil fuels – and facilitating this transition under the auspices of the UNFCCC process – can enhance the ambition and effectiveness of national and international climate mitigation efforts. Key policy insights

6 April 2015 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DTD. B. Tindall
D. B. Tindall
GPGeorgia Piggot
Georgia Piggot