Changliang Shao

Dr. Changliang Shao

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSusie Ruqun Wu
Susie Ruqun Wu
GSGabriela Elise Shirkey
Gabriela Elise Shirkey
Ilke CelikIlke Celik
Ilke Celik
Changliang ShaoChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain (BC), and the internet of things (IoT) has had significant applications in the advancement of sustainability research. This review examines how these digital transformations drive natural and human systems, as well as which industry sectors have been applying them to advance sustainability. We adopted qualitative research methods, including a bibliometric analysis, in which we screened 960 publications to identify the leading sectors that apply AI/BC/IoT, and a content analysis to identify how each sector uses AI/BC/IoT to advance sustainability. We identified “smart city”, “energy system”, and “supply chain” as key leading sectors. Of these technologies, IoT received the most real-world applications in the “smart city” sector under the dimensions of “smart environment” and “smart mobility” and provided applications resolving energy consumption in the “energy system” sector. AI effectively resolved scheduling, prediction, and monitoring for both the “smart city” and “energy system” sectors. BC remained highly theoretical for “supply chain”, with limited applications. The technological integration of AI and IoT is a research trend for the “smart city” and “energy system” sectors, while BC and IoT is proposed for the “supply chain”. We observed a surge in AI/BC/IoT sustainability research since 2016 and a new research trend—technological integration—since 2020. Collectively, six of the United Nation’s seventeen sustainable development goals (i.e., 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13) have been the most widely involved with these technologies.

1 January 2021 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XYXu Yue
Xu Yue
TZTianyi Zhang
Tianyi Zhang
Changliang ShaoChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao

26 October 2020 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xiaoping XinXiaoping Xin
Xiaoping Xin
DJDongyan Jin
Dongyan Jin
YGYong Ge
Yong Ge
JWJianghao Wang
Jianghao Wang
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
HTHuajun Tang
Huajun Tang
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the most critical component of global carbon cycle in grassland ecosystems. There has been growing interest in understanding SOC dynamics and driving forces of grassland biomes at various temporal and spatial scales. Up to now, estimates of long‐term and large‐scale changes in SOC of grassland biomes have been mostly based on modeling approaches and manipulative experiments, rather than direct measurements. During 2007–2011, we repeated 141 soil profiles of the sampling in 1963–1964 (up to 1‐m depth) to quantify the long‐term changes of SOC storage in the major grassland types of Inner Mongolia in order to tease apart the relative contributions of climate change and grazing. We found that SOC decreased in all soil types, except in the eolian sandy soils, from 1963 to 2007, with an average reduction rate of 1.8 kg C m −2 (~22.9% or 0.52% year −1 ) in the grassland biome of Inner Mongolia. We quantitatively clustered the soils into four groups using principal component analysis (PCA) and detected clear spatial dependency of the changes on climate and grazing. The climate change was responsible for 15.3–34.9% of the total SOC variations, whereas grazing intensity accounted for <9.5% of the changes. Our findings indicated that climate change, rather than grazing, was the primary forcing for the changes in SOC of Inner Mongolia grasslands. We presume that other driving forces, such as changes in nongrazing‐resultant wind erosion and atmospheric nitrogen deposition, might have played a role albeit their effects need to be further examined.

27 October 2023 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LQLuping Qu
Luping Qu
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
JXJingfeng Xiao
Jingfeng Xiao
HBHans De Boeck
Hans De Boeck
GDGang Dong
Gang Dong
Changliang ShaoChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao

13 July 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tianjie LeiTianjie Lei
Tianjie Lei
佳王佳 王
佳 王
XLXiangyu Li
Xiangyu Li
WWWeiwei Wang
Weiwei Wang
Changliang ShaoChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao
Baoyin LiuBaoyin Liu
Baoyin Liu
Flood disasters are one of the most serious meteorological disasters in China. With the rapid development of information technology, individual monitoring tools could not meet the need for flood disaster monitoring. Therefore, a new integrated air-space-ground method, based on combined satellite remote sensing, unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and field measurement technology, has been proposed to monitor and assess flood disasters caused by a dam failure in Poyang County, Jiangxi Province. In this paper, based on an air-space-ground investigation system, the general flooded areas, severely affected areas, and more severely affected areas were 53.18 km2, 12.61 km2 and 6.98 km2, respectively. The size of the dam break gap was about 65 m and 34.7 m on 22 and 23 June. The assessment precision was better than 98%, and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.86 m. The method could meet the needs for flood disaster information at different spatiotemporal scales, such as macro scale, medium scale and local small scale. The integrated monitoring of flood disasters was carried out to provide the whole process and all-round information on flood evolution dynamics, the disaster development process for flood disaster monitoring and emergency assessment, and holographic information for emergency rescue and disaster reduction, as well as to meet the need for different temporal and spatial scales of information in the process of disaster emergencies.

10 September 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRuqun Wu
Ruqun Wu
Changliang ShaoChangliang Shao
Changliang Shao
Jiquan ChenJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
Recent decades have seen a surge in corporate sustainability reports (SRs); their proliferation, however, does not ensure effective and consistent reporting on materiality. To improve the completeness, consistency and uniformity of SRs, this study aims at providing a review on the definition and identification of materiality and to propose screening methods for materiality assessments using publicly available resources. We found that most acknowledged standards and initiatives diverge in their definitions and approaches towards materiality. Four screening methods are proposed, including two that are directly usable: (1) Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Materiality Map™ and (2) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Topics for Sectors; and two involving more desktop research: (3) GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database and (4) modeling from a life-cycle perspective. The second and third approaches are tested through a comparison study for the apparel and energy industries in selected regions using content analysis. The results indicate that the two approaches, with different levels of complexity, yield inconsistency in obtaining the most (i.e., the top three) material topics. The GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database is recommended for practitioners due to its balanced disclosure on management, economic, environmental and social sustainability themes.