Jufeng Zheng

Dr. Jufeng Zheng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 August 2019 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhiwei Liu
Zhiwei Liu
MZMengtao Zhu
Mengtao Zhu
JWJiameng Wang
Jiameng Wang
XLXiuxia Liu
Xiuxia Liu
WGWenjie Guo
Wenjie Guo
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan
While biochar soil amendment has been widely proposed as a soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration strategy to mitigate detrimental climate changes in global agriculture, the SOC sequestration was still not clearly understood for the different effects of fresh and aged biochar on SOC mineralization. In the present study of a two‐factorial experiment, topsoil samples from a rice paddy were laboratory‐incubated with and without fresh or aged biochar pyrolyzed of wheat residue and with and without crop residue‐derived dissolved organic matter (CRM) for monitoring soil organic matter decomposition under controlled conditions. The six treatments included soil with no biochar, with fresh biochar and with aged biochar treated with CRM, respectively. For fresh biochar treatment, the topsoil of a same rice paddy was amended with wheat biochar directly from a pyrolysis wheat straw, the soil with aged biochar was collected from the same soil 6 years following a single amendment of same biochar. Total CO2 emission from the soil was monitored over a 64 day time span of laboratory incubation, while microbial biomass carbon and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) were determined at the end of incubation period. Without CRM, total organic carbon mineralization was significantly decreased by 38.8% with aged biochar but increased by 28.9% with fresh biochar, compared to no biochar. With CRM, however, the significantly highest net carbon mineralization occurred in the soil without biochar compared to the biochar‐amended soil. Compared to aged biochar, fresh biochar addition significantly increased the total PLFA concentration by 20.3%–33.8% and altered the microbial community structure by increasing 17:1ω8c (Gram‐negative bacteria) and i17:0 (Gram‐positive bacteria) mole percentages and by decreasing the ratio of fungi/bacteria. Furthermore, biochar amendment significantly lowered the metabolic quotient of SOC decomposition, thereby becoming greater with aged biochar than with fresh biochar. The finding here suggests that biochar amendment could improve carbon utilization efficiency by soil microbial community and SOC sequestration potential in paddy soil can be enhanced by the presence of biochar in soil over the long run.

4 November 2017 in Biology and Fertility of Soils
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJunhui Chen
Junhui Chen
XSXuan Sun
Xuan Sun
JZJufeng Zheng
Jufeng Zheng
XZXuhui Zhang
Xuhui Zhang
XLXiaoyu Liu
Xiaoyu Liu
GPGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan

1 June 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Xiaoyu LiuXiaoyu Liu
Xiaoyu Liu
JZJufeng Zheng
Jufeng Zheng
DZDengxiao Zhang
Dengxiao Zhang
Kun ChengKun Cheng
Kun Cheng
HZHuimin Zhou
Huimin Zhou
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan
Biochar addition to soil has been widely accepted as an option to enhance soil carbon sequestration by introducing recalcitrant organic matter. However, it remains unclear whether biochar will negate the net carbon accumulation by increasing carbon loss through CO2 efflux from soil (soil respiration). The objectives of this study were to address: 1) whether biochar addition increases soil respiration; and whether biochar application rate and biochar type (feedstock and pyrolyzing system) affect soil respiration. Two series of field experiments were carried out at 8 sites representing the main crop production areas in China. In experiment 1, a single type of wheat straw biochar was amended at rates of 0, 20 and 40 tha(-1) in four rice paddies and three dry croplands. In experiment 2, four types of biochar (varying in feedstock and pyrolyzing system) were amended at rates of 0 and 20 tha(-1) in a rice paddy under rice-wheat rotation. Results showed that biochar addition had no effect on CO2 efflux from soils consistently across sites, although it increased topsoil organic carbon stock by 38% on average. Meanwhile, CO2 efflux from soils amended with 40 t of biochar did not significantly higher than soils amended with 20 t of biochar. While the biochars used in Experiment 2 had different carbon pools and physico-chemical properties, they had no effect on soil CO2 efflux. The soil CO2 efflux following biochar addition could be hardly explained by the changes in soil physic-chemical properties and in soil microbial biomass. Thus, we argue that biochar will not negate the net carbon accumulation by increasing carbon loss through CO2 efflux in agricultural soils.

8 October 2020 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhiwei Liu
Zhiwei Liu
XWXiulan Wu
Xiulan Wu
WLWei Liu
Wei Liu
RBRongjun Bian
Rongjun Bian
Tida GeTida Ge
Tida Ge
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan
While high soil carbon stability had been well known for biochar‐amended soils, how conversion of crop residues into biochar and subsequent biochar amendment (BA) would favor microbial carbon use and carbon sequestration had not been clearly understood. In this study, topsoil samples were collected from an upland soil and a paddy soil, both previously amended with straw and straw‐derived biochar. These samples were incubated with 13C‐labeled maize residue (LMR) for 140 days to compare carbon mineralization, metabolic quotient (qCO2), and microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) under laboratory incubation. 13C‐phospholipid fatty acid (13C‐PLFA) was used to trace the use of substrate carbon by soil microorganisms. Comparing to straw amendment (SA), BA significantly decreased the native soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization rates by 19.7%–20.1% and 9.2%–12.0% in the upland and paddy soils, respectively. Meanwhile, total carbon mineralization from the newly added LMR was significantly decreased by 12.9% and 11.1% in the biochar‐amended soils, compared with the straw‐amended soils from the upland and paddy sites, respectively. Furthermore, compared to non‐amended soils, the qCO2 value was unchanged in straw‐amended soils, but was notably decreased by 15.2%–18.6% and 8.9%–12.5% in biochar‐amended upland and paddy soils, respectively. Microbial CUE was significantly greater in biochar‐amended soils than in straw‐amended soils due to the increasing dominance of fungi in carbon utilization. Compared to SA, BA increased CUE by 23.0% in the upland soil and 21.2% in the paddy soil. This study suggests that BA could outperform SA in the long term to enhance the biological carbon sequestration potential of both upland and paddy soils. This could be due mainly to biochar input as a special substrate to promote microbial community evolution and increase the fungal utilization of carbon substrates, especially for the soil with lower SOC levels.

16 April 2021 in Biology and Fertility of Soils
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhiwei Liu
Zhiwei Liu
XLXiuxia Liu
Xiuxia Liu
XWXiulan Wu
Xiulan Wu
RBRongjun Bian
Rongjun Bian
XLXiaoyu Liu
Xiaoyu Liu
GPGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan

29 July 2021 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhiwei Liu
Zhiwei Liu
XWXiulan Wu
Xiulan Wu
SLShixian Li
Shixian Li
WLWei Liu
Wei Liu
RBRongjun Bian
Rongjun Bian
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan