Background: The rapid advancement of deep learning in health care presents significant opportunities for automating complex medical tasks and improving clinical workflows. However, widespread adoption is impeded by data privacy concerns and the necessity for large, diverse datasets across multiple institutions. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a viable solution, enabling collaborative artificial intelligence model development without sharing individual patient data. To effectively implement FL in health care, robust and secure infrastructures are essential. Developing such federated deep learning frameworks is crucial to harnessing the full potential of artificial intelligence while ensuring patient data privacy and regulatory compliance. Objective: The objective is to introduce an innovative FL infrastructure called the Personal Health Train (PHT) that includes the procedural, technical, and governance components needed to implement FL on real-world health care data, including training deep learning neural networks. The study aims to apply this federated deep learning infrastructure to the use case of gross tumor volume segmentation on chest computed tomography images of patients with lung cancer and present the results from a proof-of-concept experiment. Methods: The PHT framework addresses the challenges of data privacy when sharing data, by keeping data close to the source and instead bringing the analysis to the data. Technologically, PHT requires 3 interdependent components: “tracks” (protected communication channels), “trains” (containerized software apps), and “stations” (institutional data repositories), which are supported by the open source “Vantage6” software. The study applies this federated deep learning infrastructure to the use case of gross tumor volume segmentation on chest computed tomography images of patients with lung cancer, with the introduction of an additional component called the secure aggregation server, where the model averaging is done in a trusted and inaccessible environment. Results: We demonstrated the feasibility of executing deep learning algorithms in a federated manner using PHT and presented the results from a proof-of-concept study. The infrastructure linked 12 hospitals across 8 nations, covering 4 continents, demonstrating the scalability and global reach of the proposed approach. During the execution and training of the deep learning algorithm, no data were shared outside the hospital. Conclusions: The findings of the proof-of-concept study, as well as the implications and limitations of the infrastructure and the results, are discussed. The application of federated deep learning to unstructured medical imaging data, facilitated by the PHT framework and Vantage6 platform, represents a significant advancement in the field. The proposed infrastructure addresses the challenges of data privacy and enables collaborative model development, paving the way for the widespread adoption of deep learning–based tools in the medical domain and beyond. The introduction of the secure aggregation server implied that data leakage problems in FL can be prevented by careful design decisions of the infrastructure. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05775068; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05775068

Big data are no longer an obstacle; now, by using artificial intelligence (AI), previously undiscovered knowledge can be found in massive data collections. The radiation oncology clinic daily produces a large amount of multisource data and metadata during its routine clinical and research activities. These data involve multiple stakeholders and users. Because of a lack of interoperability, most of these data remain unused, and powerful insights that could improve patient care are lost. Changing the paradigm by introducing powerful AI analytics and a common vision for empowering big data in radiation oncology is imperative. However, this can only be achieved by creating a clinical data science community in radiation oncology. In this work, we present why such a community is needed to translate multisource data into clinical decision aids.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients represent around one third of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. There remains a large unmet need to find treatment strategies that can improve the survival of these patients while minimizing therapeutical side effects. Increasing the availability of patients’ data (imaging, electronic health records, patients’ reported outcomes, and genomics) will enable the application of AI algorithms to improve therapy selections. In this review, we discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) can be integral to improving clinical decision support systems. To realize this, a roadmap for AI must be defined. We define six milestones involving a broad spectrum of stakeholders, from physicians to patients, that we feel are necessary for an optimal transition of AI into the clinic.

Objective: Hospitals and healthcare providers should assess and compare the quality of care given to patients and based on this improve the care. In the Netherlands, hospitals provide data to national quality registries, which in return provide annual quality indicators. However, this process is time-consuming, resource intensive and risks patient privacy and confidentiality. In this paper, we presented a multicentric ‘Proof of Principle’ study for federated calculation of quality indicators in patients with colorectal cancer. The findings suggest that the proposed approach is highly time-efficient and consume significantly lesser resources. Materials and methods: Two quality indicators are calculated in an efficient and privacy presevering federated manner, by i) applying the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles and ii) using the Personal Health Train (PHT) infrastructure. Instead of sharing data to a centralized registry, PHT enables analysis by sending algorithms and sharing only insights from the data. Results: ETL process extracted data from the Electronic Health Record systems of the hospitals, converted them to FAIR data and hosted in RDF endpoints within each hospital. Finally, quality indicators from each center are calculated using PHT and the mean result along with the individual results plotted. Discussion and conclusion: PHT and FAIR data principles can efficiently calculate quality indicators in a privacy-preserving federated approach and the work can be scaled up both nationally and internationally. Despite this, application of the methodology was largely hampered by ELSI issues. However, the lessons learned from this study can provide other hospitals and researchers to adapt to the process easily and take effective measures in building quality of care infrastructures.