The European Environment Agency believes that circular economy strategies could substantially contribute to CO₂ emissions reduction. Therefore, it is necessary that the agro-industrial sector identifies sustainable technologies for side-stream management. The scope of this review was to compare the sustainability of available biological treatments for by-product biomasses and organic waste. A total of 147 studies, all Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and Techno-Economic Analyses (TEAs), were selected through PRISMA-ScR methodology, on Scopus and Web of Science, and were bibliographically mapped on VOSviewer (Version 1.6.20) Anaerobic digestion and integrated energy recovery systems were found to be the most environmentally robust options. Integrated biorefineries and multi-product systems have emerged as the highest long-term sustainability potential, especially when process integration and co-product recovery were also implemented. Importantly, the most sustainable systems were found to have required considerable start-up investments. Thus, sustainable deployment of biological treatment technologies was clearly dependent on time-consistent policy frameworks that have been fertile to capital-intensive infrastructures via incentives and fiscal measures and that have embraced circular bioeconomy systems. Finally, this paper has demonstrated that the sustainability of biological treatments has resulted from optimal relationships between biomass characteristics, system boundaries, process integration, and market value of co-product, while no single technology has been sufficient in isolation.

Soil biodiversity is crucial for maintaining biological soil resilience, understood as a temporal property and as the ability of soils to uphold or recover their ecological functions under stress thanks to the diversity and complementarity of their biological communities. To evaluate this property, we developed the Biological Soil Resilience Index (BSR), conceived as an evolution of the QBS-ar approach by integrating additional key bioindicators—entomopathogenic nematodes, entomopathogenic fungi, and earthworms—together with microarthropod eco-morphological adaptation scores. This multi-taxon framework provides a more comprehensive assessment of soil biological conditions than single-group indices and is specifically designed to be applied repeatedly over time to detect resilience trajectories. The Biodiversity Soil Resilience (BSR) Index was applied across nine sites subject to low, medium, and high anthropogenic disturbance, spanning urban, industrial, and airport environments. Results revealed not a resilience gradient but a clear disturbance gradient: low-impact sites achieved the highest BSR values (52–59), reflecting diverse and functionally complementary assemblages; medium-impact sites maintained moderate BSR value (27–42), but displayed imbalances among faunal groups; and high-impact sites showed the lowest values, including a critically low score at C_HI (17.86), where entomopathogens were absent and earthworm populations reduced. Entomopathogenic organisms proved particularly sensitive, disappearing entirely under severe disturbance. The BSR was sensitive to environmental gradients and effective in distinguishing ecologically meaningful differences among soil communities. Because it can be repeatedly applied over time, BSR provides the basis for monitoring long-term resilience dynamics, detecting early warning signals, and support timely mitigation or restoration measures. Overall, the study highlights the pivotal role of biodiversity in sustaining soil resilience and supports the BSR Index as a simple yet integrative tool for soil health assessment and for future resilience monitoring in disturbed landscapes.

The performance of lettuce, pepper, and chili pepper, and the biological soil quality, in a ground-mounted PV system under cultivation conditions typical of the Mediterranean environment of the Puglia region were evaluated. Microclimatic parameters, plant growth and yield response, soil quality assessed using the QBS-ar index, and land equivalent ratio (LER) were determined in three different cultivation areas: a cultivation area outside the photovoltaic plant but immediately adjacent to it (‘Control’); the inter-row area closest to the row of panels exposed to sunlight (‘Area close PV structure’); the inter-row area distant from the row of panels (‘Area distant PV structure’). Cumulated solar radiation, in particular during the summer growing cycles, was only slightly affected in the Area distant PV structure (1616 and 2130 MJ m⁻² for pepper and chili pepper, respectively, in the control area, in comparison to 1630 and 2044 MJ m⁻², in the Area distant PV structure), while it was strongly reduced in the Area close PV structure (883 and 1091 MJ m⁻² for pepper and chili pepper, respectively). In general, a reduction in air temperature and wind speed, as well as an increase in relative air humidity, was observed under PV conditions. On average, the evapotranspirative demand was reduced in the PV growing conditions compared to open field, with a more relevant effect in the sub-zone close to the photovoltaic structures, where cumulative ET0 was 28% and 34% lower than the Control in the pepper and chili pepper growing cycle, respectively. Lettuce growth was impaired by PV cultivation conditions, with an average reduction of 15% in plant height and 37% in marketable yield per plant, with no significant differences between the two sub-zones in the PV system. For pepper, the best growing conditions were observed in open field control compared to PV, but with differences related to the PV sub-zone. The plants grown in the Area distant PV structure were more negatively affected by the modified growing conditions, showing the lowest shoot and fruit fresh weight, the latter reduced by 51% compared to the Control; intermediate values were observed for these parameters in the Area close PV structure, with a less severe tendency to yield reduction. For chili pepper, both shoot and fruit fresh weight were lower in PV conditions, regardless of the sub-zone, with a reduction of 82% in yield per plant compared to the Control. However, despite the yield reductions, the LER was improved (1.60 and 1.40 in case of a lettuce + pepper or lettuce + chili pepper annual cropping program, respectively), highlighting a more efficient use of land, without negative or even ameliorative impacts on biological soil quality and biodiversity in terms of QBS-ar and microarthropods taxa abundance. Knowledge of the response of different crops under cultivation conditions typical of specific environments is necessary to define optimal cropping programs aimed at maximizing resource-use efficiency and land use.

Nel presente contributo gli autori segnalano la presenza del coleottero scolitino asiatico Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky, 1866) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) per la prima volta in Puglia, in provincia di Bari, all’interno di un giardino privato sito in agro di Torre a Mare, su un carrubo. Il coleottero Xylosandrus crassiusculus, originario dell’Asia, è un insetto xilofago che ha un impatto significativo sulle piante ospiti, causando danni economici e minacciando la biodiversità ecosistemica. Il suo alto livello di adattabilità ecologica e la capacità di infestare alberi apparentemente sani sollevano preoccupazioni sull’impatto potenziale in nuovi contesti ambientali. Questa segnalazione evidenzia l’importanza di approfondire le indagini ecologiche per comprendere e gestire gli effetti di questa specie invasiva.