The timing of oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) has been a matter of substantial debate over the last 2 decades.
1-4 Pretreatment, defined as oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration prior to angiography and usually at the time of diagnosis, has been commonly used with the rationale that there may be greater platelet inhibition at time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); there may be reduced ischemic events while awaiting angiography; and more potent antiplatelet agents, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, may be avoided.
4 While these reasons may be logical, there are limited data to support this approach. Previous guidelines supporting a pretreatment strategy relied mostly on older and indirect data,
5,6 and the most recent comprehensive meta-analysis (performed in 2014), which did not support pretreatment, relied mostly on observational rather than randomized data.
1,7 Arguments against pretreatment mainly relate to increased bleeding risk among patients who require PCI, in addition to those who need coronary artery bypass grafting (in whom surgery may be delayed with increased risk of postoperative bleeding) and those who may have an alternate diagnosis (eg, aortic dissection). European guidelines recently changed to recommend against pretreatment in patients with NSTEACS based on several trials and observational studies.
8-12 However, debate still remains regarding the optimal approach,
13 and several further trials have been published that allow for a more comprehensive pooled systematic review.