The transfer of intact mitochondria between heterogeneous cell types has been confirmed in various settings, including cancer. However, the functional implications of mitochondria transfer on tumor biology are poorly understood. Here we show that mitochondria transfer is a prevalent phenomenon in glioblastoma (GBM), the most frequent and malignant primary brain tumor. We identified horizontal mitochondria transfer from astrocytes as a mechanism that enhances tumorigenesis in GBM. This transfer is dependent on network-forming intercellular connections between GBM cells and astrocytes, which are facilitated by growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43), a protein involved in neuron axon regeneration and astrocyte reactivity. The acquisition of astrocyte mitochondria drives an increase in mitochondrial respiration and upregulation of metabolic pathways linked to proliferation and tumorigenicity. Functionally, uptake of astrocyte mitochondria promotes cell cycle progression to proliferative G2/M phases and enhances self-renewal and tumorigenicity of GBM. Collectively, our findings reveal a host–tumor interaction that drives proliferation and self-renewal of cancer cells, providing opportunities for therapeutic development.

Axillary meristems (AMs) are secondary shoot meristems whose outgrowth determines plant architecture. In rice, AMs form tillers, and tillering mutants reveal an interplay between transcription factors and the phytohormones auxin and strigolactone as some factors that underpin this developmental process. Previous studies showed that knockdown of the transcription factor gene RFL reduced tillering and caused a very large decrease in panicle branching. Here, the relationship between RFL, AM initiation, and outgrowth was examined. We show that RFL promotes AM specification through its effects on LAX1 and CUC genes, as their expression was modulated on RFL knockdown, on induction of RFL:GR fusion protein, and by a repressive RFL–EAR fusion protein. Further, we report reduced expression of auxin transporter genes OsPIN1 and OsPIN3 in the culm of RFL knockdown transgenic plants. Additionally, subtle change in the spatial pattern of IR4 DR5:GFP auxin reporter was observed, which hints at compromised auxin transport on RFL knockdown. The relationship between RFL, strigolactone signalling, and bud outgrowth was studied by transcript analyses and by the tillering phenotype of transgenic plants knocked down for both RFL and D3. These data suggest indirect RFL–strigolactone links that may affect tillering. Further, we show expression modulation of the auxin transporter gene OsPIN3 upon RFL:GR protein induction and by the repressive RFL–EAR protein. These modified forms of RFL had only indirect effects on OsPIN1. Together, we have found that RFL regulates the LAX1 and CUC genes during AM specification, and positively influences the outgrowth of AMs though its effects on auxin transport.

Amino acid ligation to cognate transfer RNAs (tRNAs) is catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs)—essential interpreters of the genetic code during translation. Mammalian cells harbor 20 cytoplasmic aaRSs, out of which 9 (in 8 proteins), with 3 non-aaRS proteins, AIMPs 1 to 3, form the ∼1.25-MDa multi-tRNA synthetase complex (MSC). The function of MSC remains uncertain, as does its mechanism of assembly. Constituents of multiprotein complexes encounter obstacles during assembly, including inappropriate interactions, topological constraints, premature degradation of unassembled subunits, and suboptimal stoichiometry. To facilitate orderly and efficient complex formation, some complexes are assembled cotranslationally by a mechanism in which a fully formed, mature protein binds a nascent partner as it emerges from the translating ribosome. Here, we show out of the 121 possible interaction events between the 11 MSC constituents, 15 are cotranslational. AIMPs are involved in the majority of these cotranslational interactions, suggesting they are not only critical for MSC structure but also for assembly. Unexpectedly, several cotranslational events involve more than the usual dyad of interacting proteins. We show two modes of cotranslational interaction, namely a “multisite” mechanism in which two or more mature proteins bind the same nascent peptide at distinct sites and a second “piggy-back” mechanism in which a mature protein carries a second fully formed protein and binds to a single site on an emerging peptide. Multimodal mechanisms of cotranslational interaction offer a diversity of pathways for ordered, piecewise assembly of small subcomplexes into larger heteromultimeric complexes such as the mammalian MSC.

Ezrin links the cytoskeleton to cell surface integrins and plasma membrane receptors, contributing to the proliferative and metastatic potential of cancer cells. Elevated ezrin expression in several cancers is associated with poor outcomes. Tumor cell ezrin expression and function have been investigated in depth; however, its role in macrophages and other tumor microenvironment cells remains unexplored. Macrophages profoundly influence tumorigenesis, and here we explore ezrin’s influence on tumor-promoting macrophage functions. Ezrin knockdown in THP-1 macrophages reveals its important contribution to adhesion to endothelial cells. Unexpectedly, ezrin is essential for the basal and breast cancer cell-stimulated THP-1 expression of ITGAM mRNA that encodes integrin CD11b, critical for cell adhesion. Ezrin skews the differentiation of THP-1 macrophages towards the pro-tumorigenic, M2 subtype, as shown by the reduced expression of FN1, IL10, and CCL22 mRNAs following ezrin knockdown. Additionally, macrophage ezrin contributes to the secretion of factors that stimulate tumor cell migration, invasion, and clonogenic growth. Lastly, THP-1 ezrin is critical for the expression of mRNAs encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, consistent with pro-tumorigenic function. Collectively, our results provide insight into ezrin’s role in tumorigenesis, revealing a bidirectional interaction between tumor-associated macrophages and tumor cells, and suggest myeloid cell ezrin as a target for therapeutic intervention against cancer.

Multiprotein assemblages are the intracellular workhorses of many physiological processes. Assembly of constituents into complexes can be driven by stochastic, domain-dependent, posttranslational events in which mature, folded proteins specifically interact. However, inaccessibility of interacting surfaces in mature proteins (e.g., due to “buried” domains) can obstruct complex formation. Mechanisms by which multiprotein complex constituents overcome topological impediments remain enigmatic. For example, the heterodimeric complex formed by EBP50 and ezrin must address this issue as the EBP50-interacting domain in ezrin is obstructed by a self-interaction that occupies the EBP50 binding site. Here, we show that the EBP50-ezrin complex is formed by a cotranslational mechanism in which the C terminus of mature, fully formed EBP50 binds the emerging, ribosome-bound N-terminal FERM domain of ezrin during EZR mRNA translation. Consistent with this observation, a C-terminal EBP50 peptide mimetic reduces the cotranslational interaction and abrogates EBP50-ezrin complex formation. Phosphorylation of EBP50 at Ser³³⁹ and Ser³⁴⁰ abrogates the cotranslational interaction and inhibits complex formation. In summary, we show that the function of eukaryotic mRNA translation extends beyond “simple” generation of a linear peptide chain that folds into a tertiary structure, potentially for subsequent complex assembly; importantly, translation can facilitate interactions with sterically inaccessible domains to form functional multiprotein complexes. Significance Multiprotein complexes in mammalian cells are thought to form by interactions between domains of mature, fully folded proteins. However, in some cases interprotein interaction is obstructed by “buried” or inaccessible binding domains. One such example is the interaction between EBP50 and ezrin, proteins linking the plasma membrane and cytoskeleton; self-association of domains in ezrin masks the site recognized by EBP50. Here, we show EBP50 overcomes this obstacle by cotranslationally binding to nascent ezrin’s otherwise masked domain emerging from the translating ribosome. Our study extends the function of mRNA translation beyond “simple” generation of linear peptide chains that fold into mature proteins for subsequent complex assembly; additionally, cotranslation can facilitate interactions with sterically inaccessible domains to form functional multiprotein complexes.