Luca Liberati

Dr. Luca Liberati


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2026 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACArianna Capocasale
Arianna Capocasale
LLLuca Liberati
Luca Liberati
Danilo BuonsensoDanilo Buonsenso
Danilo Buonsenso
GBGiulia Bersani
Giulia Bersani
MCMichela Caprarelli
Michela Caprarelli
ILIlaria Lazzareschi
Ilaria Lazzareschi
Background/Objectives: Maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and the COVID-19 pandemic have both been identified as potential risk factors for socioemotional difficulties in children. This study aimed to assess behavioral outcomes in young children born to mothers previously screened for postpartum depressive symptoms, comparing cohorts evaluated during and after the pandemic using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 1½–5). Methods: An observational follow-up cohort study was conducted on 52 mother–child dyads derived from a previously established maternal cohort screened with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Two cohorts were defined according to the child’s birth period: during-pandemic (January–April 2022) and post-pandemic (October–November 2023) groups. Behavioral outcomes were assessed using CBCL 1½–5. Group differences were tested using parametric or non-parametric methods for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Exploratory regression models and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Children assessed in the post-pandemic cohort showed a lower prevalence of non-normal internalizing scores than those assessed in the during-pandemic cohort, whereas externalizing outcomes and Total Problems did not significantly differ between groups. In exploratory models, a child’s age showed a near-significant association with internalizing outcomes, suggesting that developmental stage at assessment may have contributed to the observed cohort difference. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection at delivery was not associated with children’s behavioral outcomes. Conclusions: These findings suggest a possible difference in internalizing behavioral profiles between children assessed in during-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts. However, this pattern should be interpreted cautiously because the cohorts differed substantially in age at follow-up, and age-related factors may have affected symptom detectability. Continued longitudinal follow-up will be important to clarify whether the observed differences persist over time.

26 February 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ACArianna Capocasale
Arianna Capocasale
LLLuca Liberati
Luca Liberati
Danilo BuonsensoDanilo Buonsenso
Danilo Buonsenso
GBGiulia Bersani
Giulia Bersani
MCMichela Caprarelli
Michela Caprarelli
ILIlaria Lazzareschi
Ilaria Lazzareschi
Keywords: Socioemotional development; Preschool children; Child Behavior Checklist; Postpartum depression; Maternal mood; Pandemic; Behavioral outcomes; Pediatric awareness Abstract Background/Objectives: Maternal post-partum mood alterations and the COVID-19 pandemic are recognized risk factors for children’s socioemotional difficulties. This study aims to assess behavioral outcomes in preschool children born to mothers previously screened for post-partum depression (EPDS >9), comparing cohorts evaluated during and after the pandemic through the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 1½–5). Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on a sample of 52 children aged 1.5-3 years, whose mothers had previously been screened with Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS) for another project. Two cohorts were defined by the birth date (during pandemic: Jan 2022-April2022 ; post-pandemic: October 2023-November 2023). Primary outcomes were CBCL T-scores in correlation with EPDS scores, the secondary outcome was the correlation with pandemic period. Group differences were tested using appropriate parametric (t-test) or non-parametric (Mann–Whitney U) tests for continuous data, and χ² or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Results: Children assessed in the post-pandemic period showed significantly lower internalizing and Total Problems T-scores compared to those assessed during the pandemic, while Externalizing problems T-scores remained similar. The proportion of children in clinical CBCL range decreased in post-pandemic period. Conclusions: Findings suggest a partial post-pandemic improvement in emotional-behavioral functioning among children. Such results may help raise pediatricians’ awareness of unusual demeanors or subtle behavioral cues in children born during the pandemic.

27 July 2026 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Daniela Pia Rosaria ChieffoDaniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo
Daniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo
FMFederica Moriconi
Federica Moriconi
VDValentina Delle Donne
Valentina Delle Donne
VAValentina Arcangeli
Valentina Arcangeli
VMValentina Massaroni
Valentina Massaroni
EMEugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri
Background: Neurodevelopmental disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Specific Learning Disorder (SLD), as well as neuromuscular conditions such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), are frequently associated with emotional and behavioral difficulties that may affect children’s functioning and family well-being. However, direct comparisons across these heterogeneous clinical populations remain limited. This study aimed to compare emotional and behavioral profiles across children and adolescents with ASD, ADHD, SLD, and DMD using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/6–18). Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included 197 children and adolescents (ASD: 47; SLD: 50; ADHD: 50; DMD: 50) assessed at the Clinical Psychology Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS (Rome, Italy) between 2017 and 2024. Emotional and behavioral functioning was evaluated using the parent-report CBCL/6–18. Group differences were examined using one-way ANOVA or Welch’s ANOVA, as appropriate, followed by Tukey’s HSD or Games–Howell post hoc comparisons. Results: Significant group differences emerged for Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, and Total Problems (all p < 0.001). ADHD showed the highest overall emotional and behavioral burden, with 76% of participants scoring in the clinical range for both Internalizing and Total Problems and 60% for Externalizing Problems. Elevated internalizing difficulties characterized ASD and SLD, whereas children with DMD showed generally lower CBCL scores, although 26% fell within the clinical range for Internalizing Problems. Effect sizes were moderate to large (η2 = 0.168–0.273), supporting the presence of both shared and disorder-specific emotional and behavioral patterns across heterogeneous developmental conditions. Conclusions: The findings highlight the heterogeneity of emotional–behavioral profiles across neurodevelopmental and neuromuscular conditions. The use of a common standardized assessment framework enabled the identification of both shared and disorder-specific patterns, supporting the potential value of a transdiagnostic approach to individualized assessment. Future longitudinal and multi-informant studies are warranted to clarify developmental trajectories and improve the identification of clinically meaningful emotional and behavioral needs across heterogeneous pediatric populations.