Yi Xu

Dr. Yi Xu

College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HQHaonan Qiu
Haonan Qiu
Shihong YangShihong Yang
Shihong Yang
Jiang ZeweiJiang Zewei
Jiang Zewei
YXYi Xu
Yi Xu
XJXiyun Jiao
Xiyun Jiao
Irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application are two important factors affecting yield and nitrogen loss in rice fields; however, the interaction effects of different irrigation schedules and combined management of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and nitrogen loss in rice fields remain unknown. Therefore, we collected 327 sets of data on rice yield and 437 sets of data on nitrogen loss in rice fields from 2000 to 2021 and investigated the effects of different water-saving irrigation schedules, nitrogen application levels, and water–nitrogen couplings on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss (N2O emissions, nitrogen runoff, nitrogen leaching, and ammonia volatilization) by meta-analysis using conventional flooding irrigation and no nitrogen treatment as controls. The results showed that alternate wet and dry irrigation and controlled irrigation had increasing effects on rice yield. Alternate wet and dry irrigation had a significant yield-increasing effect (average 2.57% increase) and dry cultivation significantly reduced rice yield with an average 21.25% yield reduction. Water-saving irrigation reduces nitrogen runoff and leaching losses from rice fields but increases N2O emissions, and alternate wet and dry irrigation has a significant effect on increasing N2O emissions, with an average increase of 67.77%. Most water-saving irrigation can increase nitrogen use efficiency. Among water-saving irrigation methods, the effect of controlled irrigation on increasing nitrogen use efficiency is 1.06%. Rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency both showed a trend of increasing then decreasing with nitrogen fertilizer application, and nitrogen loss gradually increased with the amount of nitrogen fertilizer input. Water–nitrogen coupling management can significantly reduce nitrogen loss in rice fields while saving water and increasing yield. Based on the analysis of the data in this study, when the irrigation amount was 300~350 mm and the nitrogen application amount was 200~250 kg/ha, the rice yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency were at a high level, which corresponded to the irrigation schedule of controlled irrigation or alternating wet and dry irrigation in the literature. However, different rice-growing areas are affected by rainfall and land capability, etc. Further optimization and correction of the adapted water and fertilizer management system for paddy fields are needed. The optimal water–nitrogen pattern of this study can achieve high rice yield and reduce nitrogen loss.

8 February 2022 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJun Hou
Jun Hou
YLYan Li
Yan Li
HCHanlin Ci
Hanlin Ci
LMLingzhan Miao
Lingzhan Miao
GYGuoxiang You
Guoxiang You
YXYi Xu
Yi Xu

25 January 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SQSuting Qi
Suting Qi
JDJie Ding
Jie Ding
Shihong YangShihong Yang
Shihong Yang
Jiang ZeweiJiang Zewei
Jiang Zewei
YXYi Xu
Yi Xu
Ammonia volatilization is an important nitrogen loss pathway in the paddy field ecosystem which leads to low nitrogen-utilization efficiency and severe atmospheric pollution. To reveal the influence and the mechanism of biochar application on ammonia volatilization from paddy fields under controlled irrigation, field experiments were conducted in the Taihu Lake Basin in China. The experiment consisted of three levels of biochar application (0, 20, and 40 t·ha−1) and two types of irrigation management (controlled irrigation and flood irrigation). Increasing ammonia volatilization occurred after fertilization. Biochar application reduced the cumulative ammonia volatilization from controlled-irrigation paddy fields, compared with non-biochar treatment. The cumulative ammonia volatilization in controlled-irrigation paddy fields with 40 t·ha−1 biochar application was reduced by 12.27%. The decrease in ammonia volatilization was related to the change in soil physical and soil physical–chemical properties and soil microbial activities. The high biochar application (40 t·ha−1) increased the NH4+-N content in soil (p < 0.01) and soil solution (p <0.05), increased by 64.98% and 19.72%, respectively. The application also increased the soil urease activity (p < 0.01), and high biochar application (40 t·ha−1) increased soil urease activity by 33.70%. Ammonia volatilization from paddy fields was significantly correlated with the nitrogen concentration (p < 0.01) in the soil solution and soil urease activity (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the abundance of ammonia monooxygenase subunit A (AOA) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) with biochar application under controlled irrigation showed an increasing trend with rice growth. The long-term application of biochar may have a relatively strong potential to inhibit ammonia volatilization. In general, the combined application of controlled irrigation and biochar provides an eco-friendly strategy for reducing farmland N loss and improving paddy field productivity.

16 May 2025 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJiazhen Hu
Jiazhen Hu
Shihong YangShihong Yang
Shihong Yang
Wim CornelisWim Cornelis
Wim Cornelis
MZMairan Zhang
Mairan Zhang
QHQian Huang
Qian Huang
LZLili Zhu
Lili Zhu
Biochar application and controlled irrigation (CI) enhance water conservation, lower emissions, and increase crop yields. However, the synergistic effects on the relationship between paddy soil microstructure and microbiome remain poorly understood. This study investigates the impact of different irrigation regimes and biochar applications on soil physicochemical properties, soil microstructure, and the composition and functions of soil microorganisms in paddy soil. The CA treatment (CI with 60 t/hm2 biochar) showed higher abundances of Mycobacteriaceae, Streptomycetaceae, Comamonadaceae, and Nocardioidaceae than the CK treatment (CI without biochar), which was attributed to two main factors. First, CA increased the pore throat equivalent radius (EqR), throat surface area (SAR), total throat number (TTN), volume fraction (VF), and connected porosity (CP) by 1.47–9.61%, 7.50–25.21%, 41.55–45.99%, 61.12–73.04%, and 46.36–93.75%, respectively, thereby expanding microbial habitats and providing refuges for microorganisms. Second, CA increased the cation exchange capacity (CEC), mean weight diameter (MWD), soil organic carbon (SOC), and total nitrogen (TN) by 22.14–25.06%, 42.24–56.61%, 22.98–56.5%, and 9.41–87.83%, respectively, reinforcing soil structural stability and carbon storage, which promoted microbial community diversity. FK (flood irrigation without biochar) showed no significant correlations with these environmental factors. Compared to CK soil metabolites at Level 2 and Level 3, FK exhibited higher levels of the citrate cycle, indicating that changes in water and oxygen environments due to CI reduced soil organic matter decomposition and carbon cycle. CA and CK strongly correlated with the soil microstructure (VF, CP, TTN, SAR, EqR), and CA notably enhanced soil metabolites related to the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies, suggesting that biochar can mitigate the adverse metabolomic effects of CI. These results indicate that biochar application in CI paddy fields highlights the critical role of soil microstructure in microbial composition and function and better supports soil sustainability.

21 May 2026 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GYGuoxiang You
Guoxiang You
YXYanhong Xia
Yanhong Xia
YXYi Xu
Yi Xu
YWYuxin Wu
Yuxin Wu
CHChengxing Huang
Chengxing Huang
JHJun Hou
Jun Hou

7 March 2026 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GYGuoxiang You
Guoxiang You
HJHaoyan Jin
Haoyan Jin
MWMiao Wu
Miao Wu
YLYongnian Li
Yongnian Li
XYXiuzhou You
Xiuzhou You
JHJun Hou
Jun Hou