Duygu Ozaskin

Dr. Duygu Ozaskin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2024 in Discover Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYaşar Culha
Yaşar Culha
SDSena Ece Davarcı
Sena Ece Davarcı
BÜBeyza Ünlü
Beyza Ünlü
DODuygu Ozaskin
Duygu Ozaskin
HDHACER DEMİR
HACER DEMİR
MBMeltem Baykara
Meltem Baykara
Purpose: This study aims to compare the clinicopathological and prognostic features of women aged 40 years and younger and 65 years and older with breast cancer. Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2021, 136 female cases aged 40 years and younger and 223 female cases aged 65 and over were identified among all cases (1395 cases) registered as breast cancer in the file archives of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology for the study. A Chi-square (× 2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent sample t-test for continuous variables. Log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier plots were used for survival analysis. For the statistical evaluation, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Both overall survival (p < 0.01) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p = 0.01) were significantly worse in the older group. BCSS were significantly worse in the older group in Luminal B (HER2−) (p = 0.013) and HR− HER2+ (p = 0.015) subtypes detected. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only the presence of metastases at diagnosis or follow-up (p < 0.001) and ECOG PS 2–3 status (p = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer-specific death. Conclusion: To our knowledge, no study directly compares these two groups. In our study, similar to many studies, more aggressive tumor features were found in young patients, but unlike many studies, mortality was found to be significantly higher in older patients. The presence of metastasis and poor ECOG PS were found to be the most influential factors in breast cancer-specific death risk.

14 April 2026 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GAGözde Ağdaş
Gözde Ağdaş
DGduygu bayır garbioglu
duygu bayır garbioglu
ESElif Sahin
Elif Sahin
MCMuhammet Cengi̇z
Muhammet Cengi̇z
DGDeniz Can Guven
Deniz Can Guven
IKibrahim karadağ
ibrahim karadağ
Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab have brought meaningful benefits to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet many patients still experience limited responses. Vitamin D is a key modulator of immune function, and deficiency is common in individuals with cancer. Given its potential role in shaping immunotherapy response, we retrospectively assessed whether baseline vitamin D levels were associated with clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with nivolumab across multiple centers, predominantly as second-line therapy. Prior to nivolumab initiation, all patients were confirmed to be negative for common driver mutations, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and other actionable genomic alterations. Baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured prior to nivolumab initiation, and patients were categorized as having severe deficiency (< 10 ng/mL), deficiency (10–20 ng/mL), or sufficient levels (≥ 20 ng/mL). The presence of liver metastases was recorded at baseline. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, ECOG performance status, liver metastasis, and other metastatic sites were used to evaluate the independent prognostic value of vitamin D status. Objective response rates (ORR) were assessed in patients with available radiologic data. A total of 890 patients were screened, and after excluding those with missing baseline vitamin D data, 305 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 64 years (range 34–85), and 68% of patients were male. Vitamin D levels were < 10 ng/mL in 30%, 10–20 ng/mL in 44%, and ≥ 20 ng/mL in 26% of patients. Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency were numerically older (median age 65 vs. 63 years) and had higher rates of ECOG PS ≥ 2 (15.1% vs. 7.5%) and squamous histology (37.6% vs. 27.5%), though these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all). Liver metastases were present in 54 patients (17.7%), and the distribution was similar across vitamin D groups (p = 0.92). Median PFS was shortest in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (3.4 months), intermediate in the 10–20 ng/mL group (5.2 months), and longest in patients with sufficient levels (8.1 months). Median OS ranged from 8.6 months in the < 10 ng/mL group to 15.8 months in the ≥ 20 ng/mL group. Patients with liver metastases had significantly shorter OS compared to those without (median OS 9.8 vs. 13.6 months, HR 1.48, p = 0.006). Vitamin D deficiency was associated with significantly worse PFS and OS on univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL remained independently associated with poorer OS. ORR was numerically higher in patients with sufficient vitamin D levels (30% vs. 14%). Lower baseline vitamin D levels were associated with inferior clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. Patients with vitamin D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL demonstrated longer PFS and OS and a trend toward higher response rates. These findings support a prognostic role for vitamin D status in immunotherapy-treated NSCLC; however, prospective studies are required to determine whether vitamin D optimization can causally enhance immunotherapy efficacy.

17 November 2025 in Discover Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSalih Tunbekici
Salih Tunbekici
GŞGökhan Şahin
Gökhan Şahin
HYHaydar Çağatay Yüksel
Haydar Çağatay Yüksel
CACaner Acar
Caner Acar
IAImge Akın
Imge Akın
EGERDEM GOKER
ERDEM GOKER
Background Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited responsiveness to standard therapies. We conducted a real-world, multicenter study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimens—doxorubicin–ifosfamide and gemcitabine–docetaxel—in patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Methods This retrospective cohort included 271 patients with advanced or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma treated between 2010 and 2023 across 30 centers in Turkey. Patients received either doxorubicin–ifosfamide (n = 142) or gemcitabine–docetaxel (n = 129) as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, while survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and further analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models. Results Median overall survival was 19.7 months with doxorubicin–ifosfamide and 20.2 months with gemcitabine–docetaxel (P = .26). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months with doxorubicin–ifosfamide and 7.0 months with gemcitabine–docetaxel (P = .62). The objective response rate was numerically higher with gemcitabine–docetaxel (35% vs. 26%), although not statistically significant (P = .11). Grade 3–4 neutropenia (16% vs. 12%) and febrile neutropenia (7% vs. 6%) were more frequent with doxorubicin–ifosfamide. Conclusions In this largest-to-date real-world cohort of metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma, doxorubicin–ifosfamide and gemcitabine–docetaxel demonstrated comparable survival outcomes. Gemcitabine–docetaxel, however, was associated with a more favorable hematologic safety profile. These findings support the clinical utility of both regimens while underscoring the need for prospective, biomarker-driven studies to refine treatment selection and improve personalization in this rare malignancy.

13 March 2026 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYCanan Yıldız
Canan Yıldız
MBMeltem Baykara
Meltem Baykara
HDHACER DEMİR
HACER DEMİR
RCRamazan Coşar
Ramazan Coşar
SYSedat Yıldız
Sedat Yıldız
ÇÖÇiğdem Özdemir
Çiğdem Özdemir
Background and Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC; however, primary and acquired resistance continues to limit their long-term efficacy. HER3 (receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB3), a member of the ErbB receptor family, has been implicated in TKI resistance through heterodimerization with EGFR and HER2, leading to downstream PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Despite its biological plausibility as a resistance mediator, the clinical significance of HER3 expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC has not been thoroughly characterized in real-world cohorts. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 52 patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received TKI therapy at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University between January 2011 and September 2023. HER3 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections using the Huabio anti-HER3 antibody (clone PD00-44, 1:2000 dilution). Staining in more than 30% of tumor cells was considered HER3-positive; membranous staining intensity was scored on a 1–3 scale. Progression-free survival (PFS1, PFS2) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of 52 patients (55.8% female; mean age 64.5 years), 59.6% received chemotherapy and 40.4% received an EGFR TKI as first-line treatment; erlotinib constituted 71.2% of targeted therapies. In the first-line TKI group, HER3-negative patients had a numerically longer median PFS1 compared with HER3-positive patients (14.0 vs. 7.1 months; p = 0.285); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance and should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size. In contrast, among patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, HER3 staining status did not meaningfully affect PFS1 (4.1 vs. 2.5 months; p = 0.063). In second-line treatment, HER3-positive patients who received TKI after prior chemotherapy demonstrated a PFS2 comparable to or slightly exceeding that of HER3-negative patients (21.8 vs. 19.8 months; p = 0.49), suggesting that the sequencing of chemotherapy before TKI may attenuate the adverse effect of HER3 positivity. Median OS was 15.1 months in HER3-negative patients and 12.7 months in HER3-positive patients (p = 0.824); this numerical difference of approximately 3 months did not reach statistical significance and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Among patients receiving TKI in the first line, HER3-positive patients had a shorter median OS than HER3-negative patients (9.6 vs. 14.2 months), whereas those receiving TKI in the second line showed a trend toward longer OS in HER3-positive patients (20.5 vs. 17.2 months). Conclusions: HER3 expression was associated with reduced first-line TKI efficacy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, suggesting a possible role for HER3 in primary TKI resistance; however, these findings are exploratory and did not reach statistical significance. The observation that HER3-positive patients who received chemotherapy before TKI demonstrated outcomes comparable to HER3-negative patients raises the hypothesis that treatment sequencing may potentially influence the impact of HER3 positivity, though this requires prospective validation before any clinical conclusions can be drawn. These results suggest that HER3 expression may warrant further investigation as a candidate biomarker for treatment sequencing decisions and as a potential therapeutic target in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Prospective studies evaluating chemotherapy–TKI sequencing and HER3-directed agents such as patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in HER3-positive patients are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

11 February 2026 in Clinical and Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSalih Tunbekici
Salih Tunbekici
HBHamit Bal
Hamit Bal
OKOğuzcan Kınıkoğlu
Oğuzcan Kınıkoğlu
HAHayati Arvas
Hayati Arvas
HMHarun Muğlu
Harun Muğlu
EGERDEM GOKER
ERDEM GOKER

30 July 2026 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FÖFARİZ EMRAH ÖZKAN
FARİZ EMRAH ÖZKAN
HDHACER DEMİR
HACER DEMİR
SUSemiha Urvay
Semiha Urvay
YCYaşar Culha
Yaşar Culha
BÜBeyza Ünlü
Beyza Ünlü
MÖMerve kuday özkan
Merve kuday özkan
Background and Objectives: Palliative care awareness among family caregivers plays a critical role in the timely utilization of supportive care services. However, awareness levels and associated factors among caregivers of cancer patients remain insufficiently explored in Türkiye. This study aimed to evaluate palliative care awareness and identify factors associated with awareness among caregivers of cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 550 caregivers of cancer patients receiving treatment at oncology clinics. Sociodemographic characteristics, caregiving-related factors, and palliative care awareness levels were assessed using a structured questionnaire. Associations between awareness and explanatory variables were evaluated using chi-square tests. Independent predictors of awareness were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Among the 550 caregivers included in the study, 277 (50.4%) reported no knowledge of palliative care, 141 (25.6%) reported sufficient knowledge, and 131 (23.8%) reported limited knowledge. Higher educational level, active employment, older age, closer relationship to the patient, advanced disease stage, and previous exposure to palliative care services were significantly associated with greater awareness. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, education level (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35–3.15, p < 0.001), employment status (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.23–2.61, p = 0.003), age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07, p = 0.004), disease stage (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05–1.72, p = 0.016), caregiver relationship (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.18–3.17, p = 0.008), and having a relative who had previously received palliative care (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.42–3.84, p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of awareness. Conclusions: Palliative care awareness among caregivers of cancer patients remains limited. Educational level, caregiving experience, and exposure to palliative care services significantly influence awareness. Strategies aimed at improving caregiver education and increasing public awareness may facilitate earlier integration of palliative care into oncology practice.