Pedro M. Costa

Dr. Pedro M. Costa

UCIBIO - Research Unit on Applied Molecular Biosciences, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2005 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSandra Caeiro
Sandra Caeiro
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
Tomas RamosTomas Ramos
Tomas Ramos
FFF. Fernandes
F. Fernandes
NSN. Silveira
N. Silveira
Marco PainhoMarco Painho
Marco Painho

1 January 2013 in BMC Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jorge Lobo-ArteagaJorge Lobo-Arteaga
Jorge Lobo-Arteaga
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
Marcos A. L. TeixeiraMarcos A. L. Teixeira
Marcos A. L. Teixeira
MFMaria Sg Ferreira
Maria Sg Ferreira
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
Filipe CostaFilipe Costa
Filipe Costa
Building reference libraries of DNA barcodes is relatively straightforward when specifically designed primers are available to amplify the COI-5P region from a relatively narrow taxonomic group (e.g. single class or single order). DNA barcoding marine communities have been comparatively harder to accomplish due to the broad taxonomic diversity and lack of consistently efficient primers. Although some of the so-called “universal” primers have been relatively successful, they still fail to amplify COI-5P of many marine animal groups, while displaying random success even among species within each group. Here we propose a new pair of primers designed to enhance amplification of the COI-5P region in a wide range of marine organisms.

1 January 2013 in Aquatic Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
SCSara Carreira
Sara Carreira
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
SCSandra Caeiro
Sandra Caeiro


1 February 2019 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCátia Gonçalves
Cátia Gonçalves
MMMarta Martins
Marta Martins
PSPaula Sobral
Paula Sobral
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa
PCPedro M. Costa
Pedro M. Costa

4 June 2015 in Frontiers in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJoaquã­n de Lapuente
Joaquã­n de Lapuente
Joana LourençoJoana Lourenço
Joana Lourenço
SMSã³Nia A. Mendo
Sã³Nia A. Mendo
MSMiquel Borrã S
Miquel Borrã S
MMMarta Martins
Marta Martins
Mário PachecoMário Pacheco
Mário Pacheco
Since Singh and colleagues, in 1988, launched to the scientific community the alkaline Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (SCGE) protocol, or Comet Assay, its uses and applications has been increasing. The thematic areas of its current employment in the evaluation of genetic toxicity are vast, either in vitro or in vivo, both in the laboratory and in the environment, terrestrial or aquatic. It has been applied to a wide range of experimental models: bacteria, fungi, cells culture, arthropods, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and humans. This document is intended to be a comprehensive review of what has been published to date on the field of ecotoxicology, aiming at the following main aspects: (i) to show the most relevant experimental models used as bioindicators both in the laboratory and in the field. Fishes are clearly the most adopted group, reflecting their popularity as bioindicator models, as well as a primary concern over the aquatic environment health. Amphibians are among the most sensitive organisms to environmental changes, mainly due to an early aquatic-dependent development stage and a highly permeable skin. Moreover, in the terrestrial approach, earthworms, plants or mammalians are excellent organisms to be used as experimental models for genotoxic evaluation of pollutants, complex mix of pollutants and chemicals, in both laboratory and natural environment. (ii) To review the development and modifications of the protocols used and the cell types (or tissues) used. The most recent developments concern the adoption of the enzyme linked assay (digestion with lesion-specific repair endonucleases) and prediction of the ability to repair of oxidative DNA damage, which is becoming a widespread approach, albeit challenging. For practical/technical reasons, blood is the most common choice but tissues/cells like gills, sperm cells, early larval stages, coelomocytes, liver or kidney have been also used. (iii) To highlight correlations with other biomarkers. (i