Federico Ballacci

Dr. Federico Ballacci


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAlessandro Telesca
Alessandro Telesca
RSRoberto Scacciavillani
Roberto Scacciavillani
GPGemma Pelargonio
Gemma Pelargonio
CCCristina Conte
Cristina Conte
FBFederico Ballacci
Federico Ballacci
MNMaria Narducci
Maria Narducci
Background: Epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) are used in different clinical situations but pericardial adhesions following prior cardiac surgery or previous epicardial procedures may limit a percutaneous approach. The objective of this case series is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a hybrid approach with surgical epicardial access as a valid alternative when pericardial space is not accessible percutaneously. Methods: After a complete preprocedural evaluation, four patients with prior cardiac surgery underwent hybrid VT ablation under general anesthesia. Surgical subxiphoid access was performed in three cases and one patient was subjected to median resternotomy for concomitant open-heart surgery. Epicardial electroanatomic voltage maps were acquired using the CARTO 3 system (Biosense Webster) or NavX (St. Jude Medical) and VT ablations with irrigated catheters were performed. The procedural endpoint was VT non-inducibility and/or LAVA/LP abolition. Results: No serious periprocedural complications occurred after hybrid VT ablation. Three patients had no complex ventricular arrhythmias after a median follow-up of 43 months. A symptomatic sustained VT relapsed in one patient, without requiring a redo ablation procedure but responded to escalation of antiarrhythmic therapy. Conclusions: A carefully planned hybrid VT ablation with surgical epicardial access is a safe and feasible procedure in patients with epicardial scar-related re-entry circuits and pericardial adhesions that limit a percutaneous approach.

24 May 2024 in EP Europace
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFederico Ballacci
Federico Ballacci
FGF Giordano
F Giordano
FFF Flore
F Flore
GBG Bencardino
G Bencardino
FTF D Tiziano
F D Tiziano
MNM L Narducci
M L Narducci
Background: Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy (infl-CMP) may overlap with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM), a group of conditions with similar ventricular arrhythmic phenotypes and key imaging, electrocardiographic, histopathological, and genetic features. Purpose: This single-centre cohort study aimed to assess the role of pathogenic genetic variants of ACM in long-term follow-up of patients with infl-CMP and ventricular arrhythmic phenotype. Methods: In this prospective, single-centre study, 24 consecutive patients with suspected infl-CMP and ventricular arrhythmic phenotype were enrolled at our tertiary referral hospital between 2017 and 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were collected. All patients underwent extensive workup, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and genetic counselling and testing. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed if a definite diagnosis had not been reached after non-invasive diagnostic workup. Patients were classified according to phenotype as ACM (either definite or borderline), as indicated by the 2010 Padua Criteria, and genetically classified as genotype-positive or genotype-negative according to the presence of pathogenic variants for ACM. Long-term follow-up was performed to assess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The primary outcome was the occurrence of in-hospital admission for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Results: At admission, 5 (21%) patients presented with syncope, 19 (79%) with high ventricular burden (>25% premature ventricular contractions) or with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. After complete diagnostic work-up, 17 patients (71%) received a diagnosis of either definite or borderline ACM, while the remaining 7 patients (29%) received a diagnosis of infl-CMP. In 18 patients (75.0%), an endomyocardial biopsy was required as part of the diagnostic workup. In our population, the frequency of pathogenic ACM variants was 41% (8 variants in ACM patients and 2 variants in infl-CMP); in particular, pathogenic genetic variants coexisted in 2 patients (1 in the ACM group: PKP2 and KCNE1 mutations; 1 in the infl-CMP group: DSG2 and TMEM43 mutations). At a mean follow-up of 4.37 (SD ±1.77) years, the primary outcome occurred in 8 patients (33%), all identified as borderline or definite ACM (X²=4.94, p=0.026). Notably, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 25% of genotype-negative and 50% of genotype-positive patients (X²=1.50, p=0.220). Conclusions: Criteria-driven diagnosis of ACM was significantly associated with the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias at long-term follow up. The presence of pathogenic genetic variants of ACM did not clearly stratify the ventricular arrhythmic risk as a single factor in our cohort of patients with ventricular arrhythmic phenotype.