Objective: The prognostic value of tumor size in neuroblastoma (NB) patients has not been fully evaluated. Our purpose is to elucidate the prognostic significance of tumor size in surgery performed on neuroblastoma patients.Methods: Neuroblastoma patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) for the study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify risk factors and the independent prognostic influences of tumor size on NB patients. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed through univariate Cox regression analysis. To determine the optimal cutoff value of tumor size, we first divided the cohort into three groups (≤5 cm, 5–10 cm, >10 cm). Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups repeatedly, with tumor size at 1 cm intervals. The cutoff value that maximized prognostic outcome difference was selected. Furthermore, we performed the Kaplan–Meier methods to visually present differences in prognosis between the optimal tumor size cutoff value in different subgroups.Results: A total of 591 NB patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected from the SEER database in this study. Cox analysis showed that age >1 year (HR = 2.42, p < 0.0001), originate from adrenal site (HR = 1.7, p = 0.014), distant stage (HR = 6.4, p < 0.0001), undifferentiated grade (HR = 1.94, p = 0.002), and large tumor size (HR = 1.5, p < 0.0001) independently predicted poor prognosis. For tumor size, there were significant differences in tumor size distribution in different ages, tumor grade, disease stage, and primary site subgroup but not in sex, race, and histology subgroup. Furthermore, both univariate (HR = 4.96, 95% CI 2.31–10.63, p < 0.0001) and multivariable analysis (HR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.29–6.08, p < 0.0001) indicated the optimal cutoff value of tumor size was 4 cm for overall survival of NB patients. Using a 4 cm of tumor size cutoff in subgroups, we found that it can identify poor prognosis patients whatever their age or primary site. Interestingly, tumor size of 4 cm cutoff can only identify unfavorable NB patients with diagnosis at distant‐stage disease, or differentiated grade tumor, but not with regional and local or undifferentiated tumor.Conclusions: Tumor size is first to be recognized as a key prognostic factor of neuroblastoma patients and a cutoff value >4 cm might predict poor prognosis, which should be included in the evaluation of prognostic factors for NB.

A superhydrophobic surface with a water contact angle of 159 ± 2° and a sliding angle of 2 ± 2° on a zinc substrate is reported in this article. The process is composed of etching, replacement deposition and annealing treatment. The surface morphologies, chemical compositions and hydrophobicity of the as-prepared surfaces were investigated using a scanning electron microscope, powder X-ray diffraction analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and contact angle measurements. The superhydrophobicity of the fabricated surface results from composite structures which consist of densely packed nanoscale particles composed of tin on microscale cavities. The optimal conditions and the formation mechanism of the superhydrophobic surfaces were also studied. Moreover, the potentiodynamic polarization shows that the as-prepared superhydrophobic surface has excellent corrosion resistance, indicating promising industrial applications.

Background: Several COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved in China. Of these, the BIBB-CorV and CoronaVac inactivated whole-virion vaccines were widely distributed in China and developing countries. However, the performance of the two vaccines in the real world has not been summarized. Methods: A living systematic review based on findings from ongoing post-licensure studies was conducted, applying standardized algorithms. Articles published between 1 May 2020 and 31 May 2022 in English and Chinese were searched for in Medline, Embase, WanFang Data, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv, SSRN, and Research Square, using SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and vaccine as the MeSH terms. Studies with estimates of safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness from receiving the BIBB-CorV or CoronaVac vaccine that met the predefined screening criteria underwent a full-text review. The Joanna Briggs Institute’s Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Cochrane risk of bias were used for assessment of the quality. A random-effects meta-regression model was applied to identify the potential impact factors on the vaccines’ effectiveness. Results: In total, 32578 articles were identified, of these, 770 studies underwent a full-text review. Eventually, 213 studies were included. The pooled occurrence of solicited and unsolicited adverse events after any dose of either vaccine varied between 10% and 40%. The top five commonly reported rare adverse events were immunization stress-related responses (211 cases, 50.0%), cutaneous responses (43 cases, 10.2%), acute neurological syndrome (39 cases, 9.2%), anaphylaxis (17 cases, 4.0%), and acute stroke (16 cases, 3.8%). The majority (83.3%) recovered or were relieved within several days. The peak neutralization titers against the ancestral strain was found within 1 month after the completion of the primary series of either vaccine, with a GMT (geometric mean titer) of 43.7 (95% CI: 23.2–82.4), followed by a dramatic decrease within 3 months. At Month 12, the GMT was 4.1 (95% CI: 3.8–4.4). Homologous boosting could restore humoral immunity, while heterologous boosting elicited around sixfold higher neutralization titers in comparison with homologous boosting. The effectiveness of receiving either vaccine against death and severe disease was around 85% for both shortly after the primary series. At Month 12, the protection against death did not decline, while the protection against severe disease decreased to ~75%. Conclusions: Both the BIBP-CorV and CoronaVac inactivated vaccines are safe. Sustained vaccine effectiveness against death was determined 12 months after the primary series, although protection against severe disease decreased slightly over time. A booster dose could strengthen the waning effectiveness; however, the duration of the incremental effectiveness and the additional benefit provided by a heterologous booster need to be studied.

Objective High-risk neuroblastoma patients often have poor outcomes despite multi-treatment options. The risk stratification of high-risk MYCN-not-amplified (HR-MYCN-NA) patients remains difficult. This study aims to identify a gene set signature that can help further stratify HR-MYCN-NA patients for a potential personalized therapeutic strategy. Methods Three microarrays and one single-cell RNA sequence dataset were acquired and analyzed. Firstly, the prognostic-related genes (PRGs) in HR-MYCN-NA tumor cells were identified using TARGET-NB and GSE137804 datasets. Then, the prognostic model was established by LASSO-Cox regression, and verified in external cohort (GSE49710, GSE45547). Moreover, a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the ROC (AUC) was used to assess survival prediction. A nomogram was established to predict the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of HR-MYCN-NA patients. Results In the training set, a five-PRGs signature, which include GAL, GFRA3, MARCKS, PSMD13, and ZNHIT3 genes, was identified and successfully stratified HR-MYCN-NA patients into ultra-high risk (UHR) and high-risk (HR) subtypes (HR = 4.29, P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis confirmed its predictive power (AUC = 0.74–0.82), suggesting a good predictive efficacy. Consistently, high-risk scores also predicted worse OS (HR = 2, P = 0.033) in the external validation dataset (AUC = 0.67–0.71). Moreover, the overall C-index of the nomogram was 0.75 (P < 0.001), which indicated good agreement between the observed and predicted survival rates. Further integrating the five PRGs signature with clinical factors, these 5 gene signature (HR = 4.45, P < 0.001) and tumor grade (HR = 4.15, P = 0.02) were found to be independent prognostic factors for HR-MYCN-NA patients. Conclusion The novel five PRGs signature could well predict the survival of HR-MYCN-NA patients, which may provide constructive information for these subsets.

Background: Determining surgical assessment in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) without radiographic pneumoperitoneum remains challenging. This study aimed to describe clinical factors associated with surgical intervention and to retrospectively assess an eight-parameter indicator in this setting. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on infants with Bell stage II–III NEC treated between July 2014 and June 2023. Patients without radiographic pneumoperitoneum were classified into the conservative management group (CON) and surgical intervention group (SUR). Variables considered clinically relevant and suitable for bedside assessment were evaluated for the construction of an exploratory composite indicator. For selected parameters, each item was coded as present or absent, and the total number of positive parameters was calculated for each infant. Clinical characteristics, parameter frequencies, and the distribution of the composite indicator were compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used descriptively to summarize the apparent discrimination of the composite indicator for observed surgical intervention. Results: A total of 115 infants were included; 70 received conservative management and 45 underwent surgical intervention. Eight bedside parameters were selected: endotracheal intubation history, hypotension, peritonitis, radiographic abnormalities, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, acidosis, and hyponatremia. The SUR group had a higher frequency of several bedside abnormalities and a higher composite indicator score than the CON group. The exploratory composite indicator showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.842 for distinguishing infants who underwent surgical intervention from those managed conservatively. Conclusions: Infants with NEC who underwent surgical intervention showed a higher burden of bedside clinical, radiographic, and laboratory abnormalities. This exploratory eight-parameter indicator may provide a practical descriptive summary of disease severity and surgical concern in this challenging clinical setting.