Glycosylation of the surface immunoglobulin (Ig) variable region is a remarkable follicular lymphoma–associated feature rarely seen in normal B cells. Here, we define a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) that acquire N-glycosylation sites selectively in the Ig complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of the antigen-binding sites. Mass spectrometry and X-ray crystallography demonstrate how the inserted glycans are stalled at oligomannose-type structures because they are buried in the CDR loops. Acquisition of sites occurs in ∼50% of germinal-center B-cell–like DLBCL (GCB-DLBCL), mainly of the genetic EZB subtype, irrespective of IGHV-D-J use. This markedly contrasts with the activated B-cell–like DLBCL Ig, which rarely has sites in the CDR and does not seem to acquire oligomannose-type structures. Acquisition of CDR-located acceptor sites associates with mutations of epigenetic regulators and BCL2 translocations, indicating an origin shared with follicular lymphoma. Within the EZB subtype, these sites are associated with more rapid disease progression and with significant gene set enrichment of the B-cell receptor, PI3K/AKT/MTORC1 pathway, glucose metabolism, and MYC signaling pathways, particularly in the fraction devoid of MYC translocations. The oligomannose-type glycans on the lymphoma cells interact with the candidate lectin dendritic cell–specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3 grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN), mediating low-level signals, and lectin-expressing cells form clusters with lymphoma cells. Both clustering and signaling are inhibited by antibodies specifically targeting the DC-SIGN carbohydrate recognition domain. Oligomannosylation of the tumor Ig is a posttranslational modification that readily identifies a distinct GCB-DLBCL category with more aggressive clinical behavior, and it could be a potential precise therapeutic target via antibody-mediated inhibition of the tumor Ig interaction with DC-SIGN–expressing M2-polarized macrophages.

Novel drugs have profoundly changed the outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, and the traditional prognostic factors that were identified in the era of chemoimmunotherapy need to be validated in the context of these new targeted therapies. Currently, the most important prognostic genetic biomarkers are the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status, genetic aberrations including del(17p)/TP53 abnormalities, and the complex karyotype. In this review, we discuss the prognostic role of these genomic markers in relation to novel treatments. Moreover, we present and discuss new scoring systems that were elaborated and validated in the era of new drugs. In routine clinical practice, the application of an extensive genomic work-up with validated prognostic markers could improve the identification of “very high-risk” CLL patients who could benefit from novel, more effective targeted treatments.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly morbid malignancy in which outcomes are constrained not only by disease refractoriness and relapse, but also by therapy-related toxicity—particularly infections, mucosal injury, and delayed hematopoietic reconstitution. The gut microbiota has emerged as a potentially modifiable layer of host vulnerability and resilience during AML treatment. Microbiome disruption is detectable already at diagnosis, even in antibiotic-naïve patients, and is often characterized by reduced community diversity, depletion of anaerobic taxa linked to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, and enrichment of pathobiont-associated profiles. During induction, cytotoxic therapy and antimicrobials precipitates diversity loss, domination events, and persistent shifts beyond discharge. Clinically, the most consistent translational signal is the association between baseline or early-treatment microbiome features and infectious outcomes, while emerging data suggest that diagnosis-time microbiome structure may also relate to hematologic recovery kinetics. Mechanistic models converge on pathways linking barrier integrity, microbial metabolites (notably butyrate and other SCFAs), immune calibration, and inflammatory translocation of microbial products. These insights support hypotheses: antimicrobial stewardship may preserve microbiome function; ecosystem repair strategies such as autologous fecal microbiota transfer (A-FMT) are feasible and can restore community structure; and metabolite or nutritional interventions merit evaluation in immunocompromised hosts. Regimen-specific microbiome effects and microbiome–drug interactions suggest that treatment choice could have downstream microbiome-mediated consequences. We synthesize evidence, outline interventional concepts, and define methodological priorities for next-generation trials assessing causality and clinical benefit. Progress will require longitudinal sampling, multi-omic integration (metabolomics, resistomics, and barrier/inflammatory biomarkers), and interventional designs linking microbiome dynamics to clinically meaningful outcomes.

Background: In the randomized, phase-3 IKEMA trial, the triplet isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (IsaKd) demonstrated superior clinical benefit compared to those of carfilzomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after 1–3 prior treatments. Methods: Our real-world, AENEID study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IsaKd in patients who relapsed after frontline lenalidomide treatment, poorly represented in the IKEMA trial. Specifically, in the present multicenter analysis, we enrolled eighty-two patients who received, between April 2022 and September 2024 and outside of clinical trials, at least one cycle of IsaKd as a second-line treatment at the first relapse after induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and lenalidomide maintenance. Results: After a median follow-up time of 12.9 months (range, 1–77), the overall response rate, at least a very good partial response rate, and median progression-free survival time were 79.3%, 56.1%, and 24.4 months, respectively. This slightly lower performance compared to that in the IKEMA study may be attributed to the well-known poor prognostic impact of lenalidomide refractoriness (len-R), developed by all our patients during maintenance therapy, and to a higher proportion of patients with extramedullary disease present in our series, which was identified as the only factor significantly affecting the PFS in multivariable analysis. The median overall survival was not reached, as in the pivotal trial, while the 1-year survival probability was 85.1%. Regarding the safety profile, our findings were consistent with those of the IKEMA trial, with no new safety signals reported. Conclusions: These real-world data support the use of IsaKd as a valuable option for len-R MM patients relapsing after the first-line therapy, including ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance.