Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of self-harm risk factors from suicide and self-harm surveillance reports in Thailand.Methods: This study analyzed data from suicide and self-harm surveillance reports submitted to Khon Kaen Rajanagarindra Psychiatric Hospital, Thailand. The process of identifying patterns of self-harm risk factors involved: data preprocessing (namely, data preparation and cleaning, missing data management using listwise deletion and expectation-maximization techniques, subgrouping factors, determining the target factors, and data correlation for learning); classifying the risk of self-harm (severe or mild) using 10-fold cross-validation with the support vector machine, random forest, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, and ensemble techniques; data filtering; identifying patterns of self-harm risk factors using 10-fold cross-validation with the classification and regression trees (CART) technique; and evaluating patterns of self-harm risk factors.Results: The random forest technique was most accurate for classifying the risk of self-harm, with specificity, sensitivity, and F-score of 92.84%, 93.12%, and 91.46%, respectively. The CART technique was able to identify 53 patterns of self-harm risk, consisting of 16 severe self-harm risk patterns and 37 mild self-harm risk patterns, with an accuracy of 92.85%. In addition, we discovered that the type of hospital was a new risk factor for severe selfharm.Conclusions: The procedure presented herein could identify patterns of risk factors from self-harm and assist psychiatrists in making decisions related to self-harm among patients visiting hospitals in Thailand.

Cross-domain sentiment analysis remains challenging due to distributional shifts and heterogeneous sentiment expressions across platforms. Existing domain adaptation approaches primarily focus on enforcing domain-invariant representations. However, such symmetry-preserving strategies often overlook directional and expression-level asymmetries. These asymmetries naturally arise in real-world sentiment data, particularly for context-inferred sentiment expressions. In this work, we propose a novel symmetry- and asymmetry-aware domain adaptation framework for cross-domain sentiment classification. The framework models symmetry through explicit multi-source distribution alignment, which captures transferable sentiment knowledge across domains. Additionally, aspect-level structural supervision organizes representations according to shared linguistic aspects. To address asymmetry, a directional divergence regularization is introduced. This component models expression-level and directional discrepancies between source and target domains. Importantly, the framework operates without requiring target-domain annotations. Experiments are conducted under a multi-source unsupervised domain adaptation setting using sentence-level hotel review datasets collected from multiple online platforms. Empirical results demonstrate strong performance for the proposed framework. It achieves an average Accuracy of 82.0% and Macro-F1 of 80.6%. The framework consistently and statistically significantly outperforms source-only, multi-source, and transformer-based adversarial adaptation baselines across all evaluated target domains (p < 0.05). Additional analyses confirm improved robustness to implicit sentiment expressions and platform-induced asymmetries. These findings highlight the importance of jointly modeling symmetry and asymmetry for robust cross-domain sentiment adaptation and provide a unified and deployable solution for sentiment analysis under realistic platform shifts.