Bert Wouters

Dr. Bert Wouters

Utrecht University, Department of Physics, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (IMAU),P.O. Box 80.005 , 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 May 2013 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAlex Gardner
Alex Gardner
GMGeir Moholdt
Geir Moholdt
JCJ. Graham Cogley
J. Graham Cogley
BWBert Wouters
Bert Wouters
AAAnthony A. Arendt
Anthony A. Arendt
FPFrank Paul
Frank Paul
Melting Away: We assume the Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets are the main drivers of global sea-level rise, but how large is the contribution from other sources of glacial ice? Gardner et al. (p. 852 ) synthesize data from glacialogical inventories to find that glaciers in the Arctic, Canada, Alaska, coastal Greenland, the southern Andes, and high-mountain Asia contribute approximately as much melt water as the ice sheets themselves: 260 billion tons per year between 2003 and 2009, accounting for about 30% of the observed sea-level rise during that period.

13 November 2009 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMichiel Van den Broeke
Michiel Van den Broeke
JBJonathan Bamber
Jonathan Bamber
JEJanneke Ettema
Janneke Ettema
Eric RignotEric Rignot
Eric Rignot
ESErnst SCHRAMA
Ernst SCHRAMA
BWBert Wouters
Bert Wouters
GRACE and Movement Together: Recent measurements of the rate of mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet vary approximately by a factor of three. Resolving these discrepancies is essential for determining the current mass balance of the ice sheet and to project sea level rise in the future. Van den Broeke et al. (p. 984 ) obtained consistent estimates from two independent methods, one based on observations of ice movement combined with model calculations and the other on remote gravity measurements made by the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellites. The combination of these approaches also resolves the separate contributions of surface processes and of ice dynamics, the two major routes of ice mass loss.

1 April 2019 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJason Box
Jason Box
WCWilliam T Colgan
William T Colgan
TCTorben Røjle Christensen
Torben Røjle Christensen
NSNiels Martin Schmidt
Niels Martin Schmidt
MLMagnus Lund
Magnus Lund
MOMorten Skovgård Olsen
Morten Skovgård Olsen

20 April 2018 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJan Melchior van Wessem
Jan Melchior van Wessem
WBWillem Jan van de Berg
Willem Jan van de Berg
BNBrice P. Y. Noël
Brice P. Y. Noël
EMErik van Meijgaard
Erik van Meijgaard
CACharles Amory
Charles Amory
MBMichiel Van den Broeke
Michiel Van den Broeke
We evaluate modelled Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) near-surface climate, surface mass balance (SMB) and surface energy balance (SEB) from the updated polar version of the regional atmospheric climate model, RACMO2 (1979–2016). The updated model, referred to as RACMO2.3p2, incorporates upper-air relaxation, a revised topography, tuned parameters in the cloud scheme to generate more precipitation towards the AIS interior and modified snow properties reducing drifting snow sublimation and increasing surface snowmelt. Comparisons of RACMO2 model output with several independent observational data show that the existing biases in AIS temperature, radiative fluxes and SMB components are further reduced with respect to the previous model version. The model-integrated annual average SMB for the ice sheet including ice shelves (minus the Antarctic Peninsula, AP) now amounts to 2229 Gt y−1, with an interannual variability of 109 Gt y−1. The largest improvement is found in modelled surface snowmelt, which now compares well with satellite and weather station observations. For the high-resolution (∼ 5.5 km) AP simulation, results remain comparable to earlier studies. The updated model provides a new, high-resolution data set of the contemporary near-surface climate and SMB of the AIS; this model version will be used for future climate scenario projections in a forthcoming study.

6 September 2016 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMichiel Van den Broeke
Michiel Van den Broeke
EEEllyn Enderlin
Ellyn Enderlin
IHIan Howat
Ian Howat
PMPeter Kuipers Munneke
Peter Kuipers Munneke
BNBrice P. Y. Noël
Brice P. Y. Noël
BWBert Wouters
Bert Wouters
We assess the recent contribution of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) to sea level change. We use the mass budget method, which quantifies ice sheet mass balance (MB) as the difference between surface mass balance (SMB) and solid ice discharge across the grounding line (D). A comparison with independent gravity change observations from GRACE shows good agreement for the overlapping period 2002–2015, giving confidence in the partitioning of recent GrIS mass changes. The estimated 1995 value of D and the 1958–1995 average value of SMB are similar at 411 and 418 Gt yr−1, respectively, suggesting that ice flow in the mid-1990s was well adjusted to the average annual mass input, reminiscent of an ice sheet in approximate balance. Starting in the early to mid-1990s, SMB decreased while D increased, leading to quasi-persistent negative MB. About 60 % of the associated mass loss since 1991 is caused by changes in SMB and the remainder by D. The decrease in SMB is fully driven by an increase in surface melt and subsequent meltwater runoff, which is slightly compensated by a small ( < 3 %) increase in snowfall. The excess runoff originates from low-lying ( < 2000 m a.s.l.) parts of the ice sheet; higher up, increased refreezing prevents runoff of meltwater from occurring, at the expense of increased firn temperatures and depleted pore space. With a 1991–2015 average annual mass loss of ∼ 0.47 ± 0.23 mm sea level equivalent (SLE) and a peak contribution of 1.2 mm SLE in 2012, the GrIS has recently become a major source of global mean sea level rise.

31 March 2013 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBR. Bintanja
R. Bintanja
GOG. J. van Oldenborgh
G. J. van Oldenborgh
SDS. S. Drijfhout
S. S. Drijfhout
BWBert Wouters
Bert Wouters
CKC. A. Katsman
C. A. Katsman