Jiaqiang Yao

Dr. Jiaqiang Yao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2026
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
JYJiaqiang Yao
Jiaqiang Yao
MLMeixi Liu
Meixi Liu
ZCZhenbang Chen
Zhenbang Chen
YXYongchao Xing
Yongchao Xing
JLJinjian Luo
Jinjian Luo
JWJi Wang
Ji Wang

20 April 2026 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXu Yang
Xu Yang
LSLiantao Song
Liantao Song
JYJiaqiang Yao
Jiaqiang Yao
ZLZhipan Li
Zhipan Li
FYFan Yu
Fan Yu
Optimization Modulo Theory (OMT) is an important extension of Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT), aiming to find models that satisfy constraints while optimizing objective functions. OMT naturally arises in program analysis and formal methods, making OMT solving an important and challenging task. OptiMathSAT is currently the state-of-the-art OMT solver supporting floating-point theories. It incrementally calls an SMT solver to prune the search space step by step until the optimal objective value is found. However, this frequent invocation of the SMT solver is highly inefficient. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel hybrid method consisting of two stages: coarse search and precise search. The coarse search stage quickly finds an approximate optimal model using an optimization search algorithm. The precise search stage then performs an SMT-based binary search starting from the approximate model to find the true optimal model (the OMT solution). Evidently, this hybrid approach reduces computational cost by rapidly shrinking the search space, thereby improving overall solving performance. We evaluated our method on benchmarks derived from SMT-LIB2 and real-world programs. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art in both effectiveness and efficiency.

7 October 2026
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
YSYang Shen
Yang Shen
YZYating Zhang
Yating Zhang
JYJiaqiang Yao
Jiaqiang Yao
MLMinghao Liu
Minghao Liu
WDWei Dong
Wei Dong

1 October 2026 in Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JYJiaqiang Yao
Jiaqiang Yao
HGHaocheng Geng
Haocheng Geng
ZCZhenbang Chen
Zhenbang Chen
The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the standard programming model for high-performance computing, yet nondeterministic scheduling in concurrent executions makes reliability assurance highly challenging. Beyond deadlocks, property-related bugs such as modifying a send buffer before a nonblocking send completes or accessing a freed RMA window are often hard to reproduce and validate, as they typically manifest only under rare event interleavings and can be both latent and catastrophic. Existing dynamic checkers usually cover only the observed schedule of a single execution; dynamic verification largely focuses on deadlocks; and static techniques scale poorly to medium-to-large programs, often timing out or running out of memory. Overall, existing techniques do not support scalable analysis of temporal properties in large MPI programs. To address these limitations, we propose the first efficient predictive monitoring approach for temporal properties in MPI programs. From a single execution, we collect an event trace and use trace equivalence to predict the set of legal equivalent executions under the same input. We then check whether any predicted execution satisfies the target property. To make this process sound, we formalize three correctness criteria for MPI trace reordering and enforce them through MPI-semantics-driven dependency extraction, tracked with vector clocks. To improve efficiency, we exploit the bounded length of a pattern language and reduce long-trace reordering to reordering short patterns. We implement our approach in MPI-PRV, instantiate ten representative MPI bug properties, and evaluate it on 13 real-world MPI applications with 38 configurations. MPI-PRV successfully and correctly analyzes all 38 tasks, whereas MPI-SV and MUST analyze only 14 and 11 tasks, respectively. MPI-PRV also achieves orders-of-magnitude reductions in runtime and memory usage, demonstrating strong efficiency and scalability for large MPI programs.