Introduction: Liquid biopsy is a useful tool for monitoring treatment outcome in solid tumors, including lung cancer. The relevance of monitoring CTCs and plasma ctDNA as predictors of clinical outcome was assessed in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib. Methods: Forty-seven EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who had progressed on prior first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors were enrolled in the study and treated with osimertinib, irrespective of the presence of the T790M mutation in the primary tumor or the plasma. Peripheral blood was collected at baseline (n = 47), post-Cycle 1 (n = 47), and at the end of treatment (EOT; n = 39). CTCs were evaluated in 32 patients at the same time points (n = 32, n = 27, and n = 21, respectively) and phenotypic characterization was performed using triple immunofluorescence staining (CK/VIM/CD45). Results: Osimertinib resulted in an ORR of 34% (2 CR) and a DCR of 76.6%. The median PFS and OS values were 7.5 (range, 0.8–52.8) and 15.1 (range, 2.1–52.8) months, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 61.7%, 27.7%, and 61.5% of patients at baseline, post-Cycle 1, and EOT, respectively. CTCs (CK+/CD45-) were detected in 68.8%, 48.1%, and 61.9% of patients at the three time points, respectively. CTCs expressing both epithelial and mesenchymal markers (CK+/VIM+/CD45-) were detected in 56.3% and 29.6% of patients at baseline and post-Cycle 1, respectively. The detection of ctDNA at baseline and post-Cycle 1 was associated with shorter PFS and OS, whereas the ctDNA clearance post-Cycle 1 resulted in a significantly longer PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex and the detection of ctDNA at baseline were independent predictors of shorter PFS (HR: 2.6, 95% C.I.: 1.2–5.5, p = 0.015 and HR: 3.0, 95% C.I.: 1.3–6.9; p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: The decrease in both CTCs and ctDNA occurring early during osimertinib treatment is predictive of better outcome, implying that liquid biopsy monitoring may be a valuable tool for the assessment of treatment efficacy.

Purpose: Metabolic reprogramming is now characterized as one of the core hallmarks of cancer, and it has already been shown that the altered genomic profile of metabolically rewired cancer cells can give valuable information. In this study, we quantified three Metabolism-Related Gene (MRG) transcripts in the circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of early stage NSCLC patients and evaluated their associations with epithelial and EMT markers. Experimental Design: We first developed and analytically validated highly sensitive RT-qPCR assays for the quantification of HK2, MCT1 and PHGDH transcripts, and further studied the expression of MRGs in CTCs that were isolated using a size-dependent microfluidic device (Parsortix, Angle) from the peripheral blood of: (a) 46 NSCLC patients at baseline, (b) 39/46 of these patients one month after surgery, (c) 10/46 patients at relapse and (d) 10 pairs of cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous FFPE tissues from the same NSCLC patients. Epithelial and EMT markers were also evaluated. Results: MCT1 and HK2 were differentially expressed between HD and NSCLC patients. An overexpression of MCT1 was detected in 15/46 (32.6%) and 3/10 (30%) patients at baseline and at progression disease (PD), respectively, whereas an overexpression of HK2 was detected in 30.4% and 0% of CTCs in the same group of samples. The expression levels of all tested MRGs decreased in CTCs one month after surgery, but a significant increase was noticed at the time of relapse for PHGDH and MCT1 only. The expression levels of HK2 and MCT1 were associated with the overexpression of mesenchymal markers (TWIST-1 and VIM). Conclusion: An overexpression of MRGs was observed at a high frequency in the CTCs isolated from early NSCLC patients, thereby supporting the role of MRGs in metastatic processes. The glycolytic and mesenchymal subpopulation of CTCs was significantly predominant compared to CTCs that were glycolytic but not mesenchymal-like. Our data indicate that MRGs merit further evaluation through large and well-defined cohort studies.

The presence of contaminating gDNA in RNA preparations is a frequent cause of false positives in RT-PCR-based analysis. However, in some cases, this cannot be avoided, especially when there are no exons–intron junctions in the lncRNA sequences. Due to the lack of exons in few of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the lack of DNAse treatment step in most studies reported so far, serious questions are raised about the specificity of lncRNA detection and the potential of reporting false-positive results. We hypothesized that minute amounts of gDNA usually co-extracted with RNA could give false-positive signals since primers would specifically bind to gDNA due to the lack of junction. In the current study, we evaluated the effect of gDNA and other forms of DNA like extrachromosomal circular DNAs (eccDNAs) contamination and the importance of including a DNAse treatment step on lncRNAsexpression.As a model, we have chosen as one of the most widely studied lncRNAs in cancer namely MALAT1, which lacks exons. When we tested this hypothesis in plasma and primary tissue samples from NSCLC patients, our findings clearly indicated that results on MALAT1 expression are highly affected by the presence of DNA contamination and that the DNAse treatment step is absolutely necessary to avoid false positive results.

Liquid biopsy enables real-time monitoring of tumor development and response to therapy through the analysis of CTCs and ctDNA. NALCN is a sodium leak channel that is frequently involved in tumor evolution and immunity and acts as a tumor suppressor. Deletion of NALCN has been shown to increase cancer metastasis and the number of CTCs in peripheral blood. In this study, we investigated for the first time NALCN promoter methylation in (a) Aza-treated cell lines (A549, TE671, BT20, and MDA-MB-468), (b) paired NSCLC tissues (n = 22), and (c) plasma cell-free DNA (ctDNA) from patients with NSCLC (early stage n = 39, metastatic n = 39) and DNA from 10 healthy donors (HD) using a newly developed highly specific and sensitive real-time MSP method. Treatment with 5′-aza-dC induced the expression of NALCN only in the A549 cell line, suggesting that DNA methylation regulates its expression in certain cancers. The mRNA expression levels of NALCN were quantified in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and adjacent non-cancerous tissues, and it was found to be underexpressed in 54.5% of tumor tissues, with significantly higher expression in recurrence-free patients (p = 0.009) than in patients who relapsed. The NALCN methylation level was not statisticallysignificantlycorrelated with the corresponding expression (p = 0.439), while Kaplan–Meier analysis showed an association between NALCN promoter hypermethylation and worse disease-free intervals (DFIs) (p = 0.017). Evaluation of NALCN methylation in ctDNA revealed that it was detected in 5.1% of early and 10.2% of advanced cases. Our results strongly suggest that epigenetic inactivation of NALCN may be a predictor of metastasis in NSCLC. Our results should be validated in further studies based on a larger patient cohort to further investigate whether DNA methylation of the NALCN promoter could serve as a potential prognostic DNA methylation biomarker and predictor of metastasis in NSCLC.

Background: AXL, a tyrosine kinase receptor, is involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell survival, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to EGFR-TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recent clinical studies have shown promising results in NSCLC patients treated with AXL inhibitors. Methods: We evaluated AXL-mRNA overexpression in CTC fractions of NSCLC patients under osimertinib treatment (Group A, n = 39), (collected in the context of a multicenter Phase II clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02771314) or immunotherapy (Group B, n = 116) at different time points collected in the context of a prospective, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04490564). Size-based CTC enrichment (Parsortix, CelLBx Health, Guildford, UK) was used, and AXL-mRNA overexpression was evaluated using RT-qPCR. Results: In Group A, AXL-mRNA overexpression in CTC fractions was detected in 5/39 (12.8%) patients’ samples at baseline, in 5/31 (16.1%) after one cycle of treatment, in 7/79 (8.9%) during treatment and in 4/32 (12.5%) at progression of disease (PD). In Group B, AXL-mRNA overexpression in CTC fractions was detected in 8/116 (6.9%) samples before immunotherapy, in 8/71 (11.3%) after three or four cycles, while no AXL transcripts were detected at PD. Conclusions: Our results indicate that AXL-mRNA overexpression in CTC fractions deserve to be further evaluated through larger clinical studies as a potential biomarker for anti-AXL targeted therapies in NSCLC.