Recent evidence revealed that an adequate preoperative physiological reserve is crucial to overcome surgical stress response. Consequently, a new concept, called prehabilitation, emerged, aiming to improve the preoperative functional reserve of patients who will undergo major abdominal surgery. During the interval between diagnosis and surgery, a multimodal approach consisting of physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support could be employed to enhance physiologic reserve. Physical activity interventions aim to improve aerobic capacity, muscle strength and endurance. Nutritional support addressing malnutrition and sarcopenia also contributes to the achievement of the above-mentioned goals, particularly in patients undergoing cancer-related procedures. Psychological interventions targeting anxiety, depression and self-efficacy, as well as risk behavior modification (e.g., smoking cessation) seem to enhance recovery. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding these interventions, and the evidence about the impact of this multidisciplinary approach on the postoperative outcomes is still contradictory. This narrative review focuses on the physiological basis of surgical stress response and on the efficacy of prehabilitation, reflected mainly in the length of hospitalization and rates of postoperative complications. Multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, nutritionists, psychologists and physiotherapists was identified as the key to the success of prehabilitation programs. Synergizing prehabilitation and ERAS protocols significantly improves short-term surgical outcomes. Recent well-designed, randomized clinical trials revealed that this approach not only enhanced functional reserve, but also decreased the rates of postoperative complications and enhanced patient’s overall quality of life, emphasizing the importance of its implementation in routine, elective, surgical care.

Background: Many papers exploring the role of resectioning metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) have focused mainly on liver and lung sites, showing improved survival compared with non-resectional therapies. However, data about exceptional metastatic sites such as splenic metastases (SMs) are scarce. This paper aims to assess the role and effectiveness of splenectomy in the case of isolated metachronous SM of CRC origin. Methods: The patients’ data were extracted after a comprehensive literature search through public databases for articles reporting patients with splenectomies for isolated metachronous SM of CRC origin. Potential predictors of survival were explored, along with demographic, diagnostic, pathology, and treatment data for each patient. Results: A total of 83 patients with splenectomies for isolated metachronous SM of CRC origin were identified. The primary CRC was at an advanced stage (Duke’s C—70.3%) and on the left colon (45.5%) for most patients, while the median interval between CRC resection and SM was 24 months. The median overall survival after splenectomy was 84 months, and patients younger than 62 years presented statistically significantly worse overall survival rates than those ≥62 years old (p = 0.011). There was no significant impact on the long-term outcomes for factors including primary tumor location or adjuvant chemotherapy (p values ≥ 0.070, ns). Laparoscopic splenectomy was increasingly used in the last 20 years from 2002 (33.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Splenectomy is the optimal treatment for patients with isolated metachronous SM of CRC, with the laparoscopic approach being increasingly used and having the potential to become a standard of care. Encouraging long-term survival rates were reported in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Younger ages are associated with worse survival. Perioperative chemotherapy in the context of a patient diagnosed with SM of CRC origin appears to be a reasonable option, although the present study failed to show any significant impact on long-term survival.

Background and objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is often diagnosed in the metastatic stage. Palliative systemic therapy is still considered the gold standard, even for patients with resectable oligometastatic disease. The aim of the current study is to assess the potential benefit of up-front gastric and liver resection in patients with synchronous resectable liver-only metastases from GC (LMGC) in a Western population. Materials and Methods: All patients with GC and synchronous LMGC who underwent gastric resection with or without simultaneous resection of LMs between January 1997 and December 2016 were selected from the institutional records. Those with T4b primary tumors or with unresectable or more than three LMs were excluded from the analysis. All patients who underwent emergency surgery for hemorrhagic shock or gastric perforation were also excluded. Results: Out of 28 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 16 underwent simultaneous gastric and liver resection (SR group), while 12 underwent palliative gastric resection (GR group). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was of 18.81 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of 71.4%, 17.9% and 14.3%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in SR group (75%, 31.3% and 25%, respectively) were significantly higher than those achieved in GR group (66.7%, 0% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort revealed that the only independent prognostic factor associated with better OS was liver resection (HR = 3.954, 95% CI: 1.542–10.139; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In a Western cohort, simultaneous resection of GC and LMGC significantly improved OS compared to patients who underwent palliative gastric resection.

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by binding to target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and suppressing their expression. Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), including mRNAs and circular RNAs (circRNAs), modulate miRNA availability through competitive binding, forming regulatory networks that fine-tune gene expression. CircRNAs can act as miRNA sponges, reducing miRNA-mediated repression of other targets, a mechanism implicated in various pathophysiological processes, including oncogenesis. Methods: We propose a mathematical model describing the dynamics of miRNA–mRNA–protein interactions, extending existing frameworks for miRNA–mRNA regulation. A qualitative analysis of the associated nonlinear differential equations system is performed. Results: We prove the boundedness of all positive solutions, establish the existence of a unique positive attracting equilibrium, and provide a mathematical perspective on the crosstalk mechanism in protein production. Conclusions: The effectiveness of ceRNA interactions depends on the relative abundance of miRNAs and their targets. This highlights the ongoing debate regarding the biological impact of low-abundance RNA transcripts on miRNA-mediated regulation.

Background and Objectives: The role of surgery in pancreatic metastases of renal cell carcinoma (PM_RCC) is highly controversial, particularly in the context of modern systemic therapies and the conflicting results of studies published so far. This study aims to explore a single surgical center experience (including mainly pancreatic resections) regarding the indications, the type of pancreatectomies, and early and long-term outcomes for PM_RCC. Materials and Methods: The data of all patients with surgery for PM_RCC (from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2023) were retrospectively assessed, and potential predictors of survival were explored. Results: 20 patients underwent surgery for PM_RCC (pancreatectomies—95%). Metachronous PM_RCC was 90%, with a median interval between the initial nephrectomy and PM_RCC occurrence of 104 months. For elective pancreatectomies, the overall and severe morbidity and mortality rates were 24%, 12%, and 0%, respectively; 32% of patients underwent non-standardized pancreatic resections. The median survival of patients with negative resection margins was 128 months after pancreatectomies, with an 82% 5-year survival rate. Left kidney RCC and the body/tail PM_RCC were favorable prognostic factors for the overall survival after pancreatectomies for PM_RCC. Body/tail, asymptomatic PM_RCC, and an interval after initial nephrectomy > 2 were favorable prognostic factors for the overall survival after initial nephrectomy for RCC. Conclusions: Pancreatectomies for PM_RCC can achieve long-term survival whenever complete resection is feasible, with acceptable complication rates. Patients with left kidney RCC, body/tail, and asymptomatic PM_RCC and an interval of more than 2 years after nephrectomy exhibit the best survival rates.