This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Weiwei Ye
School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310000, China

Basic Info

Basic Info is private.

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 26 November 2019 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Sustainable economic growth is closely linked to synergy in a national system of innovation. Although the dynamic synergy mechanism of the triple helix relations is essential to technology innovation, there are limited research methodologies to study or estimate the synergy effect accurately. This paper introduces a new approach in non-linear complex systems theory to offer steps towards a possible solution to this conundrum. Based on the pattern formation of the Belousov-Zhabotinsky’s reaction, the paper constructs a simulation equation to explore the evolution mechanism by comparing the ideal state with the current state in China. The research finds that (1) under the ideal balanced condition of industrial absorptive capacity and academic knowledge transfer capability, the stronger incentive policies would play much more important roles than weak policies; (2) the performance of collaborative innovation is not optimal under current situation in China, but the industrial absorptive capacity, especially in private enterprises, has exceeded the capability of knowledge transfer in academia, and it has become the main driving force to promote future innovation. If the innovation policy can be focused on the high-level balance between the knowledge network and innovation network to promote synergy in China, the innovation performance will be accelerated more efficiently.

ACS Style

Weiwei Ye; Yan Wang. Exploring the Triple Helix Synergy in Chinese National System of Innovation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6678 .

AMA Style

Weiwei Ye, Yan Wang. Exploring the Triple Helix Synergy in Chinese National System of Innovation. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (23):6678.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weiwei Ye; Yan Wang. 2019. "Exploring the Triple Helix Synergy in Chinese National System of Innovation." Sustainability 11, no. 23: 6678.

Articles
Published: 23 October 2018 in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Reads 0
Downloads 0

There is widespread agreement that open innovation (OI) is strongly influenced by external partner heterogeneity. While previous studies have examined partner heterogeneity using quantitative analysis, the implications of a weighted assignment using an external partner heterogeneity index have received less attention. The purpose of this study is to develop a modified partner heterogeneity model. Specifically, using a questionnaire survey of Chinese firms, we develop a new method to measure partner organisational heterogeneity (POH). Then, the moderating factors of an industry's technological environment, termed the technological regime, are introduced. The empirical analysis shows that the technological regime is positively correlated with POH and OI performance. Hence, an advanced technological regime improves POH and OI performance by incorporating external resources and increasing innovation potential.

ACS Style

Shufang Huang; Jin Chen; Weiwei Ye; Kun Wang. The effect of external partner heterogeneity on open innovation: the moderating role of the technological regime. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2018, 31, 593 -605.

AMA Style

Shufang Huang, Jin Chen, Weiwei Ye, Kun Wang. The effect of external partner heterogeneity on open innovation: the moderating role of the technological regime. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2018; 31 (5):593-605.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shufang Huang; Jin Chen; Weiwei Ye; Kun Wang. 2018. "The effect of external partner heterogeneity on open innovation: the moderating role of the technological regime." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31, no. 5: 593-605.