Rorie Beswick-Parsons

Dr. Rorie Beswick-Parsons

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Sustainable Production and Consumption
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGSarah Greenwood
Sarah Greenwood
SWStuart Walker
Stuart Walker
HBHarriet M. Baird
Harriet M. Baird
RBRorie Beswick-Parsons
Rorie Beswick-Parsons
SMSeth Mehl
Seth Mehl
RRRachael Rothman
Rachael Rothman

25 July 2024 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMaryam Hoseini
Maryam Hoseini
SGSarah Greenwood
Sarah Greenwood
SESaima Eman
Saima Eman
PMPaul Mattinson
Paul Mattinson
HBHarriet M. Baird
Harriet M. Baird
RRRachael Rothman
Rachael Rothman

16 July 2017 in Planning Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RBRorie Beswick-Parsons
Rorie Beswick-Parsons
GVGeoff Vigar
Geoff Vigar
This paper investigates the place of utility cycling (cycling as a means of transport rather than as a sport or leisure activity) under urban modernism in the UK. In many western contexts the dominant feature of urban modernism was its emphasis on accommodating private vehicles to the neglect of other forms of mobility. The result was the production of a ‘car-system’ with significant change to urban and rural environments. This paper assesses resistance to what we term ‘automobile modernism’ during the high watermark of its planning and implementation (1950–1970), using the UK Cyclists’ Touring Club (now known as Cycling UK) archive. We make three contributions. First, and primarily, we highlight how cycling advocacy contested automobile modernism’s claim that cycling was ‘outmoded’. In so doing we note significant continuity in policy debates and political advocacy regarding cycling’s place in the road environment around issues such as segregation from motor vehicles. Contemporary attempts to promote cycling, as well as a wider urban sustainability agenda, are heavily influenced by this history. Second, we highlight a commonality between cycling and other resistance to automobile modernism in terms of rural and urban landscape impacts. Third, we highlight how the CTC ‘professionalized’ its advocacy to resist automobile modernism.

26 August 2021 in British Food Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRorie Beswick-Parsons
Rorie Beswick-Parsons
Purpose: Whilst plastic packaging has recently been critiqued for its detrimental effects on the environment, it is largely overlooked in histories of food retailing. This paper presents a historical perspective on plastic packaging, highlighting its role in transforming UK food retailing throughout the middle to late twentieth century.Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on an analysis of the Marks & Spencer Company Archive, supplemented by company histories and biographical sources. Three examples were purposively selected based on their technologically innovative role in maintaining and enhancing Marks & Spencer's core values.Findings: The analysis highlights plastic packaging's significance in enabling Marks & Spencer's product development process whilst maintaining and enhancing the company's core values of standards, quality, safety, freshness, hygiene and convenience. The examples demonstrate the role of plastics in technological innovation, achieving key commercial objectives in product development and contributing to the transformation of food retailing.Research limitations/implications: The research focuses on three specific examples of packaging innovation, drawing out their wider implications for socio-technical change in UK food retailing.Originality/value: This historical research suggests that greater attention should be paid to plastic packaging including its material properties and the services it provides, moving beyond a blanket condemnation by acknowledging its multiple affordances in the food sector. These historical insights are instructive when thinking about the future of retailing and shopping in the context of the need for better environmental outcomes.

1 June 2020 in Architectural Research Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDaniel Mallo
Daniel Mallo
ATArmelle Tardiveau
Armelle Tardiveau
RBRorie Beswick-Parsons
Rorie Beswick-Parsons
Over the last decade, we have witnessed renewed interest in design as a socially engaged practice. Much of the debates around ‘social design’ point towards myriad approaches and disciplinary fields interwoven with grass-roots initiatives and social movements. Among these, design activism has gained traction as critical spatial practice that operates on the fringes of commercial and institutional spheres. The temporal, spatial and experimental nature of design activism is well delineated in scholarship but its long-term effect on everyday urban environments remains elusive. Moreover, the influence of design activism on socio-spatial dynamics is indeed largely under researched. By mobilising social practice theory, this paper proposes a novel theorisation of design activism that sheds light on the social formations and collective practices catalysed through the activist impulse. This ontological shift embraces an understanding of the socio-material world through practice. Such characterisation of design activism underscores collective moments of integration of the constitutive elements of practice, encapsulated by Shove, Pantzar and Watson as ‘material, competence and meaning’. The authors' own empirical research, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) in the UK, reveals design activism as necessarily intertwined with other everyday practices – gardening, celebrating, playing – that coalesce around a shared sense of citizenship. It also advances the role of design activism in forging communities of practice: mutually supportive and self-sustaining groups emerging out of the personal relations sustained and organised around a practice of place making.

12 January 2026 in Consumption and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJack Pickering
Jack Pickering
RBRorie Beswick-Parsons
Rorie Beswick-Parsons
KDKristina Diprose
Kristina Diprose
Reusable packaging systems have been recognised as a part of sustainability and circular economy transitions but they are widely considered to be inconvenient for the consumer. This article challenges the notion that reuse systems are necessarily inconvenient by drawing attention to reuse practices, differences between reusable packaging systems, and associated complexes of consumption practices. Theoretical insights from studies of convenience food and meal planning are used to inform our approach to convenience and convenient practices. In the UK, recent reusable packaging trials in mainstream retail have offered consumers the opportunity to participate in reusable packaging systems as part of their otherwise ordinary consumption. Based on qualitative research conducted with reusable packaging system users participating in these trial systems and others during this time, three practice complexes are identified and examined. These are bulk buying, organisational practices and weekly shopping. The analysis of these complexes provides insight into difficult aspects of reusable packaging systems, while separating discussion of these aspects from areas which would change with system transition. This locates the niche position of reusable packaging systems within a potential transition process and reiterates the importance of considering convenience in context.