Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are interrelated metabolic disorders with significant global health impacts. MASLD, the hepatic manifestation of metabolic dysfunction, is driven by insulin resistance, ectopic lipid accumulation, and systematic inflammation. T2DM exacerbates the progression of MASLD, increasing the risk of advanced fibrosis, cardiovascular complications, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This bidirectional relationship highlights the need for integrated management strategies. The pathology of these conditions involves disrupted lipid and glucose metabolism, leading to a cycle of metabolic dysfunction which worsens both hepatic and systemic outcomes. Non-invasive diagnostic tools have improved early detection but lack precision in staging liver disease, emphasizing the need for more accurate biomarkers. Routine screening for MASLD in diabetic populations is critical for early intervention. Management focuses on weight reduction through lifestyle changes, although long-term adherence remains a challenge. Pharmacological advancements, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) and sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, show promise in reducing liver fat, improving glycemic control, and slowing fibrosis progression. However, these therapies are less effective in advanced stages of fibrosis and cirrhosis, underscoring the need for novel treatment options. In conclusion, the intertwined nature of MASLD and T2DM necessitates a multidisciplinary approach integrating early diagnosis, lifestyle interventions, and targeted therapies. Future research should prioritize refining diagnostic accuracy and developing innovative treatments for delivering personalized care strategies to mitigate the growing burden of these conditions. These efforts are crucial for improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Background: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), particularly hot flashes and night sweats, are highly prevalent during the menopausal transition and have been increasingly associated with adverse cardiometabolic profiles. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) represents a major manifestation of systemic metabolic dysregulation and is rising globally. Emerging evidence suggests a potential overlap between menopausal symptom severity and MASLD risk; however, this relationship remains insufficiently characterized. Method: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map the existing evidence on the association between VMS and MASLD. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE was performed for English-language studies published between January 2015 and December 2025. Eligible studies included original research assessing both MASLD and menopausal symptoms. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Methodological quality was appraised using the CASP Cross-Sectional Studies Checklist. Results: Of 690 identified records, five cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 106 to 5995 participants from Korea, Greece, and the United States. Across studies, moderate-to-severe VMS were consistently associated with increased MASLD prevalence or higher surrogate indices of hepatic steatosis. Women with more severe VMS demonstrated unfavorable metabolic profiles, including greater insulin resistance and elevated liver enzyme levels. Although adjustments for body mass index and hypertension attenuated some associations, the overall trend remained positive. Heterogeneity was observed in diagnostic tools and symptom assessment methods. Conclusions: Current evidence indicates a consistent association between VMS severity and MASLD in peri- and postmenopausal women. While causality cannot be inferred due to cross-sectional designs, VMS may represent a clinical marker of underlying metabolic and hepatic dysfunction. Longitudinal and mechanistic studies are warranted to clarify directionality and inform integrated screening strategies in midlife women.

Background/Objectives: Therapeutic education for children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a continuous and essential process in the effective management of the disease. These programs consider the unique characteristics and developmental needs of each child or adolescent, aiming to empower them to take responsibility for their disease self-management, improve quality of life, and prevent complications. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of therapeutic education in children and adolescents with T1DM on self-management of their disease. Methods: International bibliography was reviewed using electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Key words such as “Therapeutic Education”, “Type 1 diabetes”, “children”, “self-management”, “glycemic control”, and “educational programs” in combination with Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used in English language to search for studies conducted during 2014–2024. Results: A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most reported improvements in glycemic control, though not all showed statistically significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Enhanced treatment adherence and increased diabetes-related knowledge were common outcomes. Combined educational approaches incorporating psychoeducational interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness in promoting self-management. Digital tools, such as Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), further supported adherence. Quality-of-life improvements were noted but were not always sustained long-term. Parental involvement appeared to improve children’s confidence in disease management. The critical role of interdisciplinary diabetes care teams, particularly nurses’ role, was also highlighted. Conclusions: Therapeutic education appears to support self-management among children and adolescents with T1DM, particularly when programs are individualized, family-centered, multidisciplinary, and supported by psychosocial or technological components. However, effects on glycemic control were not consistent across studies, and further research is needed to confirm long-term outcomes.

Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is increasingly recognized as a condition associated with impaired skeletal health and increased fracture risk. Although osteoporosis is usually considered more clinically relevant after menopause, diabetes-related skeletal alterations may begin earlier in life. This scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on bone-health outcomes in premenopausal women with T1D. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched, supplemented by Google Scholar and manual screening of reference lists. Eligible studies examined bone mineral density (BMD), fracture history or fracture risk, bone turnover markers, quantitative ultrasound parameters, bone microarchitecture, or other skeletal outcomes in premenopausal women or women with T1D. Results: Seven studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were mainly observational and varied in sample size, age range, diabetes duration, skeletal sites assessed, and bone-assessment methods. Most studies reported lower BMD or less favorable skeletal parameters in premenopausal women with T1D compared with women without diabetes, particularly at peripheral or hip-related skeletal sites. Quantitative ultrasound studies suggested impaired peripheral skeletal properties, while one MRI-based study identified trabecular microarchitectural deficits. Several studies also reported altered bone turnover markers and associations between poorer glycemic control, adverse health behaviors or diabetes-related complications, and poorer bone outcomes. Fracture data were limited and were based on previous or self-reported fractures. Potential determinants of skeletal health were variably reported across studies, with more consistent consideration of body mass index and selected lifestyle or reproductive factors than of autoimmune, nutritional, medication-related, and detailed reproductive variables. Conclusions: Available evidence indicates that premenopausal women with T1D may exhibit early alterations in skeletal health, including differences in BMD, peripheral bone measures, bone turnover, and microarchitecture. These findings highlight the potential importance of considering bone health before the menopausal transition. However, prospective data on fragility fractures remain limited, and further longitudinal studies incorporating detailed reproductive, metabolic, and clinical factors are needed to clarify the long-term skeletal implications and inform future risk-assessment strategies.