Early stage small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0SCLC) represents 7% of all SCLC. The standard treatment in patients with intrathoracic SCLC disease is the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Nowadays, the recommended management of this highly selected group is surgical resection due to favorable survival outcomes. For medically inoperable patients or those who refuse surgery, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1-2N0SCLC, transferring the favorable experience obtained on inoperable NSCLC (Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer). In the era of multimodality treatment, adjuvant systemic therapy plays an important role even in the management of early SCLC, increasing the disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI), that currently has a Category I recommendation for localized stage SLCL, remains controversial in this selected subgroup of patients due to the lower risk of brain metastasis. This review summarizes the most relevant data on the local management of T1-2N0M0SCLC (surgery and radiotherapy), and evaluates the relevance of adjuvant treatment. Provides a critical evaluation of best current clinical management options for T1-2N0M0 SCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. While multi-modal artificial intelligence (AI) models offer significant predictive potential, their translation into routine clinical practice is delayed by the “black box” nature of complex algorithms and the fragmentation of heterogeneous data. We present LANTERN-XGB, a hierarchical machine learning workflow designed to bridge this gap by generating interpretable “digital human avatars” for precision oncology. The methodology employs a multi-stage scalable tree boosting system (XGBoost) architecture utilizing shapley additive explanations (SHAP) for rigorous hierarchical feature selection, missing value management, and patient-specific decision support. The workflow was developed and benchmarked using a retrospective cohort of 437 patients with clinical N0 NSCLC, followed by validation on a prospective dataset (n = 100) and an independent external dataset (n = 100). The pipeline integrates diverse data modalities to predict occult lymph node metastasis (OLM). LANTERN-XGB identified a robust consensus signature driven by non-linear interactions among CT textural fragmentation, PET metabolic heterogeneity, tumor density distribution, and systemic clinical modulators. Exploratory transcriptomic pathway analysis (GSVA) revealed that high-risk predictions strongly correlate with systemic molecular dysregulation, such as the enrichment of immune-inflammatory signaling and metabolic stress pathways. The model achieved robust discrimination in external validation (AUC ≈ 0.77), performing comparably to state-of-the-art nomogram benchmarks. Crucially, the LANTERN-XGB framework demonstrated superior utility in handling diagnostic ambiguity; local force plots allowed for the correct reclassification of “borderline” prediction by visualizing feature interactions that standard linear models fail to capture. LANTERN-XGB provides a validated, open-source framework that successfully balances predictive power with clinical transparency. By empowering clinicians to visualize and verify the logic behind AI predictions, this workflow offers a pragmatic path for integrating reliable multi-modal avatars into daily medical decision-making.

Introduction: Lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, is a heterogeneous malignancy comprising distinct histological and molecular subtypes, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for approximately 85% of cases and adenocarcinoma (ADC) representing the most prevalent histotype. An emerging pathological feature of NSCLC, spread through air spaces (STAS)—defined as the extension of tumor cells into the lung parenchyma beyond the main tumor margin—has been associated with worse disease-free and overall survival and has been proposed as a possible predictor of recurrence to guide surgical extent. Concurrently, recent comprehensive genomic profiling of early-stage NSCLC has highlighted the need to interpret multi-omics data and their relationship with pathological variables, including IASLC histological subtypes, to better personalize treatment strategies. In this context, we investigated the overall distribution of STAS and its association with tumor mutational profiles and IASLC histological subtypes in a large real-world cohort of lung adenocarcinoma patients from the LANTERN project. Materials and Methods: In a prospective, multicenter observational study (March 2023–December 2024), 271 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and genomic data were collected; comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay to analyze 523 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability; and STAS was assessed according to IASLC criteria. Adenocarcinoma accounted for roughly 90% of the cases, with a median age of 69 years and a predominance of stage IV disease (49.5%). STAS was evaluable in 162 cases and was detected in 17.9% of tumors. Results: STAS-positive tumors showed a higher trend towards locally advanced and advanced disease; no differences were observed in sex, age, smoking status, tumor mutational burden, or PD-L1 expression. Additionally, STAS-positive tumors showed a higher association with micropapillary, mucinous, and papillary patterns, whereas the acinar pattern was more frequent in STAS-negative tumors. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53, KRAS, EGFR, and STK11, with no significant differences between groups; ROS1 alterations were absent in STAS-negative tumors but detected more frequently in STAS-positive cases. Conclusions: Overall, these findings indicate that STAS positivity is associated with high-risk histological subtypes and advanced disease, suggesting its importance as a marker of tumor aggressiveness and emphasizing the need for its systematic evaluation in lung adenocarcinoma to better guide surgical planning and patient risk assessment.