Sehoon Kim

Dr. Sehoon Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 May 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJiwan Lee
Jiwan Lee
CJChunggil Jung
Chunggil Jung
SKSehoon Kim
Sehoon Kim
SKSeong Joon Kim
Seong Joon Kim
This study was to evaluate the groundwater-level behavior in Geum River Basin (9645.5 km2) of South Korea with HadGEM3-RA RCP 4.5 and 8.5 climate change scenarios and future groundwater use data using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). Before evaluating future groundwater behavior, the SWAT model was calibrated and validated using the daily inflows and storage of two dams (DCD and YDD) in the basin for 11 years (2005–2015), the daily groundwater-level observation data at five locations (JSJS, OCCS, BEMR, CASS, and BYBY), and the daily inflow and storage of three weir locations (SJW, GJW, and BJW) for three years and five months (August 2012 to December 2015). The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2) of two dam inflows was 0.55–0.70 and 0.67–0.75. For the inflows of the three weirs, NSE was 0.57–0.77 and R2 was 0.62–0.81. The average R2 value for the groundwater levels of the five locations ranged from 0.53 to 0.61. After verifying the SWAT for hydrologic components, we evaluated the behavior of future groundwater levels by future climate change scenarios and estimated future ground water use by Korean water vision 2020 based on ground water use monitoring data. The future groundwater-level decreased by −13.0, −5.0, and −9.0 cm at three upstream locations (JSJS, OCCS, and BEMR) among the five groundwater-level observation locations and increased by +3.0 and +1.0 cm at two downstream locations (CASS and BYBY). The future groundwater level was directly affected by the groundwater recharge, which was dependent on the seasonal and spatial precipitations in the basin.

16 September 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJinuk Kim
Jinuk Kim
JLJiwan Lee
Jiwan Lee
JPJongyoon Park
Jongyoon Park
SKSehoon Kim
Sehoon Kim
SKSeong Joon Kim
Seong Joon Kim
This study aims to develop a reservoir operation rule adding downstream environmental flow release (EFR) to the exclusive use of irrigation water supply (IWS) from agricultural reservoirs through canals to rice paddy areas. A reservoir operation option was added in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to handle both EFR and IWS. For a 366.5 km2 watershed including three agricultural reservoirs and a rice paddy irrigation area of 4744.7 ha, the SWAT was calibrated and validated using 21 years (1998–2018) of daily reservoir water levels and downstream flow data at Gongdo (GD) station. For reservoir water level and streamflow, the average root means square error (RMSE) ranged from 19.70 mm to 19.54 mm, and the coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) had no effect on the improved SWAT. By applying the new reservoir option, the EFR amount for a day was controlled by keeping the reservoir water level up in order to ensure that the IWS was definitely satisfied in any case. The downstream mean wet streamflow (Q95) decreased to 5.70 m3/sec from 5.71 m3/sec and the mean minimum flow (Q355) increased to 1.05 m3/sec from 0.94 m3/sec. Through the development of a SWAT reservoir operation module that satisfies multiple water supply needs such as IWR and EFR, it is possible to manage agricultural water in the irrigation period and control the environmental flow in non-irrigation periods. This study provides useful information to evaluate and understand the future impacts of various changes in climate and environmental flows at other sites.

19 January 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSehoon Kim
Sehoon Kim
JLJiwan Lee
Jiwan Lee
JKJinuk Kim
Jinuk Kim
YKYong Won Kim
Yong Won Kim
HSHyung-Jin Shin
Hyung-Jin Shin
SKSeong Joon Kim
Seong Joon Kim
Considering the priority of water supply, agricultural water supply capacity downstream of the Yeongsan River Basin was evaluated in this study. The water balance was analyzed using the Please check all author names carefullyMODSIM-decision support system (MODSIM-DSS) to evaluate the agricultural water supply capacity. MODSIM-DSS can also be used to analyze the watershed demand status and agricultural water supply facilities. In this study, the watershed inflow and agricultural reservoir inflow (supply) data for each watershed were obtained using the SWAT outflow data. SWAT was calibrated and validated using 16-years (2005–2020) of daily streamflow data from one water level station and two weirs, by considering water withdrawal and return flows from agricultural, domestic, and industrial water use. The coefficient of determination (R2) was analyzed as 0.50 to 0.80 at three stations. Then, water balance analyses were performed for 41 years (1980–2020) by applying the SWAT outflow results to MODSIM-DSS. The results showed that agricultural water shortages of 517.8 × 106 m3, 520.0 × 106 m3, 579.8 × 106 m3, and 517.5 × 106 m3, occurred in 1992, 1994, 1995, and 2015, respectively. The efficiencies of agricultural water supply for these years were 58.2%, 58.0%, 53.2%, and 58.2%, respectively, which were lower than the 40-year average of 84.5%.

3 February 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHyung-Jin Shin
Hyung-Jin Shin
GLGyumin Lee
Gyumin Lee
JLJaenam Lee
Jaenam Lee
SKSehoon Kim
Sehoon Kim
Inhong SongInhong Song
Inhong Song
Robust water management systems are crucial for sustainable water use, particularly considering rapidly changing, ever-improving water supply system technologies. However, the establishment of specific management standards in upland fields is challenging, as several types of crops are cultivated in upland fields. Hence, the timing and required amount of water vary greatly, further rendering drought response challenging. In this study, we evaluated the agricultural drought vulnerability of South Korean upland fields, considering the lack of water resources, to establish preliminary drought damage prevention measures. The Technique for Order of Preference method was used for the drought vulnerability assessment, and the assessment indicators used were annual rainfall, number of dry days, upland field area, available soil water capacity, and groundwater usage. The 20 areas of highest vulnerability comprised large cultivation areas with minimal subsurface-water usage, except for areas where the number of dry days appeared to be the major factor for drought vulnerability. Damage caused by recurring droughts accumulated over time; thus, upland-field-oriented management may be required and can even be used in cases where insufficient drought information is available. Future studies can use the proposed method while considering assessment factors that describe upland field conditions.