Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment decreases the hospitalisation rate in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19, but data on efficacy in patients with haematological malignancy are scarce. Here, we describe the outcome of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in a large cohort of the latter patients. This is a retrospective cohort study from the multicentre EPICOVIDEHA registry (NCT04733729) on patients with haematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and September 2022. Patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared to those who did not. A logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration in our sample. Mortality between treatment groups was assessed with Kaplan–Meier survival plots after matching all the patients with a propensity score. Additionally, a Cox regression was modelled to detect factors associated with mortality in patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. A total of 1859 patients were analysed, 117 (6%) were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 1742 (94%) were treated otherwise. Of 117 patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 80% had received ≥1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose before COVID-19 onset, 13% of which received a 2nd vaccine booster. 5% were admitted to ICU. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms at COVID-19 onset, for example anosmia, fever, rhinitis, or sinusitis (aOR 2.509, 95%CI 1.448–4.347) and 2nd vaccine booster (aOR 3.624, 95%CI 1.619–8.109). Chronic pulmonary disease (aOR 0.261, 95%CI 0.093–0.732) and obesity (aOR 0.105, 95%CI 0.014–0.776) were not associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use. After propensity score matching, day-30 mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 2%, significantly lower than in patients with SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (11%, p = 0.036). No factor was observed explaining the mortality difference in patients after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration. Haematological malignancy patients were more likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir when reporting extrapulmonary symptoms or 2nd vaccine booster at COVID-19 onset, as opposed to chronic pulmonary disease and obesity. The mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was lower than in patients with targeted drugs other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. EPICOVIDEHA has received funds from Optics COMMIT (COVID-19 Unmet Medical Needs and Associated Research Extension) COVID-19 RFP program by GILEAD Science, United States (Project 2020-8223).

Background: Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting RANKL, is widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis. In addition to its skeletal benefits, emerging evidence suggests that denosumab may also exert positive effects on muscle health by modulating inflammation, myostatin expression, and insulin sensitivity through the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. Aims: To systematically review the available literature on the effects of denosumab on muscle-related outcomes, including muscle strength, muscle mass, physical performance, and fall risk. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through May 2025 for studies evaluating the impact of denosumab on muscle health in human subjects. Outcomes of interest included grip strength, lean muscle mass, gait speed, fall incidence, and physical performance tests. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized trials and observational cohorts. Most reported favorable outcomes for denosumab compared to bisphosphonates or placebo, particularly in grip strength and physical performance. Preclinical studies further support the biological role of RANKL in muscle dysfunction. However, one recent randomized controlled trial in older adults residing in long-term care settings found no significant effect on muscle outcomes, highlighting inconsistencies in the evidence. Discussion: Denosumab shows potential for improving muscle-related outcomes in older adults, particularly those with osteosarcopenia. Conclusions: Current evidence is heterogeneous and inconclusive. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to clarify the effects of denosumab on muscle health and its possible role in sarcopenia prevention and management.

Anorexia of aging (AoA) is a prevalent geriatric syndrome characterized by a multifactorial decline in appetite and reduced food intake associated with the aging process. This systematic review aims to investigate the use and outcomes of cannabinoids in addressing AoA, with the goal of providing a comprehensive understanding and discussing their potential integration into daily clinical practice. A thorough search of databases (Embase Ovid, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) identified 6100 studies. After eliminating duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 25 studies underwent full appraisal. Two reviewers assessed inclusion suitability, and study methodologies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the modified Jadad Scoring Scale for randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, six studies published between 2002 and 2019, involving 869 participants, were included in the review. Out of the 6 fin. l papers selected, 5 were randomized trials, and 1 was a prospective study. Megestrol acetate (800 mg/d) proved to be more effective than dronabinol 2.5 mg twice a day in increasing appetite. Nabilone (at a dosage of 0.5 mg per day) did not show superiority over placebo in alleviating symptoms such as pain, nausea, loss of appetite, and weight. However, with a double dosage followed by 1.0 mg/6 weeks, after eight weeks of treatment, patients recorded a significant increase in calorie intake and carbohydrate consumption compared to the placebo group, with some patients also experiencing substantial weight gain. Regarding delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a weight increase of ≥10% was observed in 17.6% of patients with doses of 5 mg or 10 mg capsules daily, without significant side effects. Additionally, patients treated with THC 2.5 mg reported improved chemosensory perception and increased appetite before meals compared to placebo. No significant side effects were reported in older adults taking cannabinoids. Cannabinoids offer promise in enhancing the quality of life for older individuals with active neoplastic disease. However, to establish comprehensive guidelines, further research with larger sample sizes is essential. Only through this approach can we fully grasp the potential and application of cannabinoids in addressing the nutritional concerns associated with neoplastic diseases.

This review aimed to illustrate the types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review (PR) based on a literature review together with the opinions of a social media audience via Twitter. This study was conducted via the #OpenSourceResearch collaborative platform and combined a comprehensive literature search on the current PR system with the opinions of a social media audience of surgeons who are actively engaged in the current PR system. Six independent researchers conducted a literature search of electronic databases in addition to Google Scholar. Electronic polls were organized via Twitter to assess surgeons’ opinions on the current PR system and potential alternative approaches. PR can be classified into single-blind, double-blind, triple-blind, and open PR. Newer PR systems include interactive platforms, prepublication and postpublication commenting or review, transparent review, and collaborative review. The main limitations of the current PR system are its allegedly time-consuming nature and inconsistent, biased, and non-transparent results. Suggestions to improve the PR process include employing an interactive, double-blind PR system, using artificial intelligence to recruit reviewers, providing incentives for reviewers, and using PR templates. The above results offer several concepts for possible alternative approaches and modifications to this critically important process.

Background: Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) is an increasingly recognized respiratory pathogen in immunocompromised patients, but its impact in haematological malignancies is poorly defined. Unlike influenza or SARS-CoV-2, hMPV has no specific treatment or vaccine, contributing to underdiagnosis and underestimation of its clinical relevance. Method: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study within the Epidemiology of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies: A European Haematology Association Survey/ Epidemiology of respiratory viral infections in patients with hematological malignancies: A European Haematology Association Survey registry of haematological patients with hMPV (January 2023–December 2024), comparing clinical features and outcomes with matched influenza and SARS-CoV-2 cohorts. Results: The study included 130 patients with hMPV. Median age was 58.5 years; 57% were male. Plasma cell neoplasms (25%), lymphoma (23%), and acute myeloid leukemia (20%) were the most common hematological malignancies. Hospitalization occurred in 64%, intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 19%, and 30-day mortality was 8%. Most cases (73%) received supportive care only. Secondary infections were common (24%). Chronic renal disease significantly increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 20.9 11.05, P = .014). Compared with influenza and SARS-CoV-2, hMPV patients had comparable severity and outcomes, with 18.5% ICU admission rates versus 25.9% for influenza (P = .316) and 20.9% versus 4.7% for SARS-CoV-2 (P = .006), and 30-day mortality of 5.6% versus 11.1% for influenza (P = .489) and 7.0% versus 2.3% for SARS-CoV-2 (P = .277), yet received fewer targeted interventions. Conclusions: hMPV causes clinically significant disease in patients with hematological malignancy, often necessitating hospital and ICU care, and leading to mortality. In the absence of specific treatments or vaccines, this virus remains an underrecognized pathogen in patients with hematological malignancy. Enhanced clinical awareness and investment in diagnostics, prevention, and therapeutics are needed.