Objective: This paper presents and evaluates a breast-specific magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) system. A first-in-human evaluation demonstrates the novel hardware, a sophisticated tumor targeting algorithm and a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol. Methods: At the time of submission, N = 10 patients with non-palpable T0 stage breast cancer have been treated with the breast MRgFUS system. The described tumor targeting algorithm is evaluated both with a phantom test and in vivo during the breast MRgFUS treatments. Treatments were planned and monitored using volumetric MR-acoustic radiation force imaging (MRARFI) and temperature imaging (MRTI). Results: Successful technical treatments were achieved in 80% of the patients. All patients underwent the treatment with no sedation and 60% of participants had analgesic support. The total MR treatment time ranged from 73 to 114 minutes. Mean error between desired and achieved targeting in a phantom was 2.9±1.8 mm while 6.2±1.9 mm was achieved in patient studies, assessed either with MRTI or MR-ARFI measurements. MRTI and MR-ARFI were successful in 60% and 70% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The targeting accuracy allows the accurate placement of the focal spot using electronic steering capabilities of the transducer. The use of both volumetric MRTI and MR-ARFI provides complementary treatment planning and monitoring information during the treatment, allowing the treatment of all breast anatomies, including homogeneously fatty breasts.

Purpose: To develop and characterize a tissue-mimicking phantom that enables the direct comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) imaging techniques useful for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatments. With no additions, gelatin phantoms produce little if any scattering required for US imaging. This study characterizes the MR and US image characteristics as a function of psyllium husk concentration, which was added to increase US scattering. Methods: Gelatin phantoms were constructed with varying concentrations of psyllium husk. The effects of psyllium husk concentration on US B-mode and MR imaging were evaluated at nine different concentrations. T1, T2, and T2* MR maps were acquired. Acoustic properties (attenuation and speed of sound) were measured at frequencies of 0.6, 1.0, 1.8, and 3.0 MHz using a through-transmission technique. Phantom elastic properties were evaluated for both time and temperature dependence. Results: Ultrasound image echogenicity increased with increasing psyllium husk concentration while quality of gradient-recalled echo MR images decreased with increasing concentration. For all phantoms, the measured speed of sound ranged between 1567–1569 m/s and the attenuation ranged between 0.42–0.44 dB/(cm·MHz). Measured T1 ranged from 974–1051 ms. The T2 and T2* values ranged from 97–108 ms and 48–88 ms, respectively, with both showing a decreasing trend with increased psyllium husk concentration. Phantom stiffness, measured using US shear-wave speed measurements, increased with age and decreased with increasing temperature. Conclusions: The presented dual-use tissue-mimicking phantom is easy to manufacture and can be used to compare and evaluate US-guided and MR-guided HIFU imaging protocols.

In focused ultrasound (FUS) thermal ablation of diseased tissue, acoustic beam and thermal simulations enable treatment planning and optimization. In this study, a treatment-planning methodology that uses the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method and the Pennes’ bioheat equation (PBHE) is experimentally validated in homogeneous tissue-mimicking phantoms. Simulated three-dimensional temperature profiles are compared to volumetric MR thermometry imaging (MRTI) of FUS sonications in the phantoms, whose acoustic and thermal properties are independently measured. Additionally, Monte Carlo (MC) uncertainty analysis is performed to quantify the effect of tissue property uncertainties on simulation results. The mean error between simulated and experimental spatiotemporal peak temperature rise was +0.33°C (+6.9%). Despite this error, the experimental temperature rise fell within the expected uncertainty of the simulation, as determined by the MC analysis. The average errors of the simulated transverse and longitudinal full width half maximum (FWHM) of the profiles were –1.9% and 7.5%, respectively. A linear regression and local sensitivity analysis revealed that simulated temperature amplitude is more sensitive to uncertainties in simulation inputs than in the profile width and shape. Acoustic power, acoustic attenuation and thermal conductivity had the greatest impact on peak temperature rise uncertainty; thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity had the greatest impact on FWHM uncertainty. This study validates that using the HAS and PBHE method can adequately predict temperature profiles from single sonications in homogeneous media. Further, it informs the need to accurately measure or predict patient-specific properties for improved treatment planning of ablative FUS surgeries.

Purpose: This study validates that phase aberrations in breast magnetic resonance-guided focussed ultrasound (MRgFUS) therapies can be corrected in a clinically relevant time frame to generate more intense, smaller and more spatially accurate foci. Materials and methods: Hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) ultrasound calculations in an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tissue model, were used to compute phase aberration corrections for improved experimental MRgFUS heating in four heterogeneous breast-mimicking phantoms (n = 18 total locations). Magnetic resonance(MR) temperature imaging was used to evaluate the maximum temperature rise, focus volume and focus accuracy for uncorrected and phase aberration-corrected sonications. Thermal simulations assessed the effectiveness of the phase aberration correction implementation. Results: In 13 of 18 locations, the maximum temperature rise increased by an average of 30%, focus volume was reduced by 40% and focus accuracy improved from 4.6 to 3.6 mm. Mixed results were observed in five of the 18 locations, with focus accuracy improving from 6.1 to 2.5 mm and the maximum temperature rise decreasing by 8% and focus volume increasing by 10%. Overall, the study demonstrated significant improvements (p < 0.005) in maximum temperature rise, focus volume and focus accuracy. Simulations predicted greater improvements than observed experimentally, suggesting potential for improvement in implementing the technique. The complete phase aberration correction procedure, including model generation, segmentation and phase aberration computations, required less than 45 min per sonication location. Conclusion: The significant improvements demonstrated in this study i.e., focus intensity, size and accuracy from phase aberration correction have the potential to improve the efficacy, time-efficiency and safety of breast MRgFUS therapies.