The paper presents a conceptual model of the route of macroplastic debris (>5 mm) through a fluvial system, which can support future works on the overlooked processes of macroplastic storage and remobilization in rivers. We divided the macroplastic route into (1) input, (2) transport, (3) storage, (4) remobilization and (5) output phases. Phase 1 is mainly controlled by humans, phases 2–4 by fluvial processes, and phase 5 by both types of controls. We hypothesize that the natural characteristics of fluvial systems and their modification by dam reservoirs and flood embankments construction are key controls on macroplastic storage and remobilization in rivers. The zone of macroplastic storage can be defined as a river floodplain inundated since the beginning of widespread disposal of plastic waste to the environment in the 1960s and the remobilization zone as a part of the storage zone influenced by floodwaters and bank erosion. The amount of macroplastic in both zones can be estimated using data on the abundance of surface- and subsurface-stored macroplastic and the lateral and vertical extent of the zones. Our model creates the framework for estimation of how much plastic has accumulated in rivers and will be present in future riverscapes.

The process of macroplastic (>0.5 cm) fragmentation results in the production of smaller plastic particles, which threaten biota and human health and are difficult to remove from the environment. The global coverage and long retention times of macroplastic waste in fluvial systems (ranging from years to centuries) create long-lasting and widespread potential for its fragmentation and the production of secondary micro- and nanoplastics. However, the pathways and rates of this process are mostly unknown and existing experimental data not fully informative, which constitutes a fundamental knowledge gap in our understanding of macroplastic fate in rivers and the transfer of produced microparticles throughout the environment. Here we present a conceptual framework which identifies two types of riverine macroplastic fragmentation controls: intrinsic (resulting from plastic item properties) and extrinsic (resulting from river characteristics and climate). First, based on the existing literature, we identify the intrinsic properties of macroplastic items that make them particularly prone to fragmentation (e.g., film shape, low polymer resistance, previous weathering). Second, we formulate a conceptual model showing how extrinsic controls can modulate the intensity of macroplastic fragmentation in perennial and intermittent rivers. Using this model, we hypothesize that the inundated parts of perennial river channels-as specific zones exposed to the constant transfer of water and sediments-provide particular conditions that accelerate the physical fragmentation of macroplastics resulting from their mechanical interactions with water, sediments, and riverbeds. The unvegetated areas in the non-inundated parts of perennial river channels provide conditions for biochemical fragmentation via photo-oxidation. In intermittent rivers, the whole channel zone is hypothesized to favor both the physical and biochemical fragmentation of macroplastics, with the dominance of the mechanical type during the periods with water flow. Our conceptualization aims to support future experimental and modelling works quantifying plastic footprint of different macroplastic waste in different types of rivers.

Macroplastic storage in mountain rivers remains unexplored and it is unknown how river morphology and different surface types of river areas modulate this process. Therefore, we sampled macroplastic debris stored on the surface of emergent river areas with different vegetation cover and on wood jams in a channelized, single-thread reach and an unmanaged, multi-thread reach of the Dunajec River in the Polish Carpathians. Total amounts of macroplastic debris retained in these reaches were then estimated on the basis of mean mass of macroplastic deposited on unit area of each surface type and the area of this surface type in a given reach. Exposed river sediments and areas covered with herbaceous vegetation stored significantly lower amounts of macroplastic debris (0.6 and 0.9 g per 1 m² on average) than wooded islands and wood jams (respectively 6 g and 113 g per 1 m²). The amounts of macroplastic debris stored on wood jams exceeded 19, 129 and 180 times those found on wooded islands, areas covered with herbaceous vegetation and exposed river sediments. Wooded islands and wood jams covering 16.7% and 1.5% of the multi-thread reach stored 43.8% and 41.1%, respectively, of the total amount of macroplastic stored in that reach, whereas these surface types were practically absent in the channelized reach. Consequently, the unmanaged, multi-thread reach, 2.4 times wider than the neighbouring channelized reach, stored 36 times greater amount of macroplastic per 1 km of river length. Our study demonstrated that the storage of macroplastic debris in a mountain river is controlled by channel management style and resultant river morphology, which modulate river hydrodynamics and a longitudinal pattern of the zones of transport and retention of macroplastic conveyed by river flow.

Mountain rivers are typically seen as relatively pristine ecosystems, supporting numerous goods (e.g., water resources) for human populations living not only in the mountain regions but also downstream from them. However recent evidence suggests that mountain river valleys in populated areas can be substantially polluted by macroplastic (plastic item >25 mm). It is unknown how distinct characteristics of mountain rivers modulate macroplastic routes through them, which makes planning effective mitigation strategies difficult. To stimulate future works on this gap, we present a conceptual model of macroplastic transport pathways through mountain river. Based on this model, we formulate four hypotheses on macroplastic input, transport and mechanical degradation in mountain rivers. Then, we propose designs of field experiments that allow each hypothesis to be tested. We hypothesize that some natural characteristics of mountain river catchments can accelerate the input of improperly disposed macroplastic waste from the slope to the river. Further, we hypothesize that specific hydromorphological characteristics of mountain rivers (e.g., high flow velocity) accelerate the downstream transport rate of macroplastic and together with the presence of shallow water and coarse bed sediments it can accelerate mechanical degradation of macroplastic in river channels, accelerating secondary microplastic production. The above suggests that mountain rivers in populated areas can act as microplastic factories, which are able to produce more microplastic from the same amount of macroplastic waste inputted into them (in comparison to lowland rivers that have a different hydromorphology). The produced risks can not only affect mountain rivers but can also be transported downstream. The challenge for the future is how to manage the hypothesized risks, especially in mountain areas particularly exposed to plastic pollution due to waste management deficiencies, high tourism pressure, poor ecological awareness of the population and lack of uniform regional and global regulations for the problem.