Objective: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), reflects the nutritional and immunological status of the patient and has been associated with outcomes in various cancers. In this study, the prognostic significance of PNI in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and its potential role in guiding treatment decisions between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide is investigated.Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 167 mHSPC patients treated between 2019 and 2024. PNI was calculated using the formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (/mm³). Patients were stratified into high and low PNI groups according to a cutoff value of 49.98, determined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS), and PSA progression‐free survival (PSA‐PFS), were assessed. Treatment responses to abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide were compared within PNI strata.Results: Patients with PNI > 49.98 had significantly longer median OS than those with PNI ≤ 49.98 (36.6 months vs. 30.0 months, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified high PNI, ECOG performance status 0–1, and absence of visceral metastasis as independent predictors of improved OS. Among patients with low PNI, those treated with enzalutamide had superior OS compared to those receiving abiraterone acetate (p = 0.004), while no significant OS difference was noted between treatments in the high PNI group (p = 0.55).Conclusion: PNI serves as a significant prognostic biomarker in mHSPC, correlating with overall survival and potentially influencing treatment efficacy between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide. Integrating PNI into clinical practice may aid in tailoring individualized treatment options.

Background: We present two cases of secondary pneumothorax after immunotherapy in two different clinics. Case summary: A 25-year old female patient with metastatic osteosarcoma, treated with atezol... Lay abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used with increasing frequency in cancer therapy. New side effects associated with these drugs have been identified. Air accumulation between the pleur...

Introduction: The case of a patient who developed recurrent delayed immune-related pneumonitis (checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis [CIP]) after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced ... Plain language summary Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been used in many types of cancer because they cause prolonged tumor responses. However, new side effects associated with these drugs have b...

Aim: The authors present real-world data on the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: The Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortiu... Lay abstract Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) that blocks the communication between T cells and cancer cells and instead activates T cells to fight against cancer. Metastatic renal...

The study evaluated the distributions and prognostic significance of ABO and rhesus (D) groups in male breast cancer (MBC) patients. The data of 137 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, histopathological data and ABO/Rh blood groups of the patients were recorded. The ABO/Rh blood group distributions were compared to the healthy men control group (n = 120,160) by the chi-square test. Overall distributions of ABO blood groups were different between the patients (17.5% AB, 38% A, 19% B, and 25.5% O) and control group (7.88% AB, 42.06% A, 15.22% B, and 34.84% O) (P < .001). There were significant differences between the patients and control group with respect to AB vs non-AB blood group distributions (P < .001, odds ratio: 2.43, 95% CI) and O vs non-O blood group distributions (P = .016, odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI). However, A vs non-A and B vs non-B blood group distributions were not significantly different. The distribution of the Rh factor was similar between patients and the control group (P = .93). In univariate analysis, ABO/Rh blood groups were not a prognostic factor on OS (P = .29). The frequency of the AB blood group in MBC patients is increased than in the healthy control group. AB blood group may be a risk factor for MBC, whereas O blood group may be a protective factor.