Objectives: To evaluate the agreement among radiologists in the evaluation of rectal cancer staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant therapy) and assess whether locoregional recurrence can be predicted with this information. Materials and Methods: Pre-neoadjuvant and after-neoadjuvant therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. The agreement between the MRI findings (localization of tumor involvement, tumor coverage pattern, external sphincter involvement, mucin content of the mass and lymph node, changes in the peritoneum, MRI T stage, distance between tumor and MRF, submucosal sign, classification of locoregional lymph node, and EMVI) was discussed at the September 2023 meeting of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and the interobserver and histopathological findings were examined. The patients were evaluated according to locoregional rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) staging, and re-staging was performed using MRI images after neoadjuvant treatment. The ability of the locoregional and LLN staging system to predict locoregional recurrence was evaluated. Results: Among the parameters examined, for the MRI T stage and distance between the tumor and the MRF, a moderate agreement (kappa values: 0.61–0.80) was obtained, while for all other parameters, the interobserver agreement was notably high (kappa values 0.81–1.00). LLNs during the restaging with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 0.33–4.87, p = 0.004) and a distance between the tumor and the MRF of less than 1 mm with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.12–3.94, p = 0.023) affected locoregional recurrence. A multivariable Cox regression test revealed that the restaging of lymph nodes among the relevant parameters had an impact on locoregional recurrence, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.32–1.82, p = 0.047). With the LLN staging system, an increase in stage was observed in 37 patients (15.5%), and locoregional recurrence was detected in 33 of them (89.2%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: LLN staging is not only successful in predicting locoregional recurrence among MRI parameters but is also associated with a very high level of interobserver agreement. The presence of positive LLN in the restaging phase is one of the most valuable MRI parameters for poor prognosis.

Crizotinib is a multikinase inhibitor, effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mesenchymal-epidermal transition (MET) alterations. Although small prospective studies showed efficacy and safety of crizotinib in NSCLC with MET alterations, there is limited real-life data. Aim of this study is to investigate real-life efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET alterations. This was a retrospective, multicenter (17 centers) study of Turkish Oncology Group. Patients’ demographic, histological data, treatment, response rates, survival outcomes, and toxicity data were collected. Outcomes were presented for the study population and compared between MET alteration types. Total of 62 patients were included with a median age of 58.5 (range, 26–78). Major histological type was adenocarcinoma, and 3 patients (4.8%) had sarcomatoid component. The most common MET analyzing method was next generation sequencing (90.3%). MET amplification and mutation frequencies were 53.2% (n = 33) and 46.8% (n = 29), respectively. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 56.5% and 74.2% in whole study population, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8–10.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 18.7 months (95% CI: 13.7–23.7), regardless of treatment line. Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.6–6.4) for patients with MET amplification, whereas 14.3 months (95% CI: 6.7–21.7) for patients with MET mutation (P = .217). Median PFS was significantly longer in patients who have never smoked (P = .040), have good performance score (P < .001), and responded to the treatment (P < .001). OS was significantly longer in patients with MET mutation (25.6 months, 95% CI: 15.9–35.3) compared to the patients with MET amplification (11.0 months; 95% CI: 5.2–16.8) (P = .049). In never-smokers, median OS was longer than smoker patients (25.6 months [95% CI: 11.8–39.3] vs 16.5 months [95% CI: 9.3–23.6]; P = .049). The most common adverse effects were fatigue (50%), peripheral edema (21%), nausea (29%) and diarrhea (19.4%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were observed in 6.5% of the patients. This real-life data confirms efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC harboring MET alteration.

The study evaluated the distributions and prognostic significance of ABO and rhesus (D) groups in male breast cancer (MBC) patients. The data of 137 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, histopathological data and ABO/Rh blood groups of the patients were recorded. The ABO/Rh blood group distributions were compared to the healthy men control group (n = 120,160) by the chi-square test. Overall distributions of ABO blood groups were different between the patients (17.5% AB, 38% A, 19% B, and 25.5% O) and control group (7.88% AB, 42.06% A, 15.22% B, and 34.84% O) (P < .001). There were significant differences between the patients and control group with respect to AB vs non-AB blood group distributions (P < .001, odds ratio: 2.43, 95% CI) and O vs non-O blood group distributions (P = .016, odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI). However, A vs non-A and B vs non-B blood group distributions were not significantly different. The distribution of the Rh factor was similar between patients and the control group (P = .93). In univariate analysis, ABO/Rh blood groups were not a prognostic factor on OS (P = .29). The frequency of the AB blood group in MBC patients is increased than in the healthy control group. AB blood group may be a risk factor for MBC, whereas O blood group may be a protective factor.