Background and Objective: Perianal pathologies are the most common cause of perianal infections in patients with hematological malignancies. Perianal infection diagnosis in this group of patients is difficult, thus careful anorectal examination is necessary, with imaging modalities. The literature revealed a knowledge gap on the approach of anal pathologies in patients with neutropenia during diagnosis or chemotherapy. This study aimed to examine our institutional data of perianal complications and investigate the relationship among the white blood cell-neutrophil count, perianal lesion, and the type of treatment in patients with hematologic malignancies during the neutropenic period. Methods: Patients with a hematologic malignancy, hospitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy, complicated by perianal pathology, and documented by at least one imaging method were included in the study. Results: A total of 42 patients were included in the study. The comparison between the groups revealed no statistical significance between the anal abscess formation and the neutrophil count and previous perianal pathology. A statistical significance in favor of acute myeloid leukemia was found between patient diagnosis and anal abscess development. An inverse relationship was found between the number of white blood cells at hospitalization and having an anal pathology operation. It was observed that patients with high white blood cell count were less operated on due to anal pathology. Conclusions: In conclusion, this article has shown that white blood cell count at the time of hospitalization in patients with hematological malignancy, can affect the operation status of patients due to anal pathologies that may occur in the neutropenic period.

The impact of inflammatory markers such as systemic immune-inflammation (SII) index and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) on myelofibrosis (MF) prognosis was evaluated for the first time in this study. Data from 60 patients diagnosed with MF between March 2011 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to disease-related markers, the impact of SII and SIRI on prognosis was evaluated. In our study, the overall median survival (OS) was 64 months. OS was significantly shorter in patients older than 65 years, with high ferritin and lymphocyte levels, transfusion dependence at diagnosis, platelet count below 100 × 10⁹/L, Hb level below 8 g/dl, and high risk according to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-Plus score. When these variables were included in the multivariate Cox regression model, it was found that being older than 65 years, having a high ferritin value, being at high risk according to the DIPSS-plus score and Hb values below 8 increased the risk of death. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and SII index were lower in patients with a fatal outcome. No statistically significant relationship was found between SIRI and mortality. The findings of this study showed that low PLR and high ferritin were associated with poor prognosis in MF. Elevated SII and SIRI, evaluated for the first time in patients with myelofibrosis, did not predict prognosis. Since non-inflammatory variables play a role in the pathogenesis of MF, bone marrow indicators and systemic inflammation indicators derived from hematologic parameters may not be accurate.

Background and Objectives: Bleeding is a major cause of mortality in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The predictive power of the standard International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) score for bleeding in patients diagnosed with AML is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the standard ISTH score and modified versions in predicting bleeding among acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3) and non-APL AML subgroups. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 190 AML patients (61 APL, 129 non-APL). The predictive power of the original ISTH score and eight different modified scores—incorporating parameters such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and genetic positivity—for DIC-related bleeding was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: In the APL group, the original ISTH score was statistically significant in predicting DIC-related bleeding (AUC = 0.727), but the modifications did not improve performance. In the non-APL AML group, the original score did not predict bleeding (AUC = 0.632, p = 0.079). However, a modified ISTH score excluding D-dimer and including LDH (≥800 mg/dL) and genetic positivity significantly improved prediction (AUC = 0.710, p = 0.005). This modification increased specificity from 48.2% to 60.7% and sensitivity from 76.5% to 82.4%. Conclusions: A subtype-specific approach is required to predict bleeding risk in AML-associated DIC. Modified ISTH scores remain suboptimal for APL; however, a modified score incorporating LDH and genetic status represents a promising tool to identify non-APL AML patients at risk of bleeding and warrants prospective validation.

Background: Several thrombotic risk assessment models have been proposed for identifying patients with a high risk of thrombosis (the IMPEDE venous thromboembolism (VTE), SAVED, and PRISM scores) in multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, adding a biomarker (D-dimer) for the IMPEDE VTE score has shown that it can boost the detection power of IMPEDED VTE. However, data from studies comparing these models in MM are scarce. Even real-world data arguing the utility of thrombotic risk assessment models in MM from low- or middle-income countries like Türkiye are lacking. Methods: We aimed to show the possibility of detecting VTE using the IMPEDED VTE score in our cohort by retrospectively screening MM patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare the IMPEDE VTE, SAVED and IMPEDED VTE scoring models. Results: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 455 MM patients from three centers in Bursa, Türkiye, evaluating the incidence of VTE within six months of the treatment. The IMPEDED VTE score showed superior predictive accuracy (c-statistic of 0.701), compared to the IMPEDE VTE (0.618) and SAVED (0.633) scores, demonstrating the added value of D-dimer as a biomarker. The cumulative incidence of VTE in the cohort was 10.7%, comparable to rates observed in real-world studies. Conclusions: Despite the interventions and thrombotic risk assessment models, thrombosis remains a high-risk entity. Personalized risk assessment tools, such as IMPEDED VTE, could be used to manage thrombotic risk in MM patients, particularly in resource-limited settings. Albeit the thromboprophylaxis (51.6%), our findings support the utility of biomarker-enhanced models for better VTE-risk stratification, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Background/Objectives: The modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX), derived from routinely available laboratory parameters, has emerged as a potential biomarker reflecting systemic inflammatory and endothelial stress. However, its prognostic value in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated the association between the mEASIX and overall survival and explored its time-dependent prognostic pattern. Methods: This retrospective study included 151 patients with MDS. The mEASIX score was calculated using C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and platelet count and was log-transformed for regression analyses. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, including age, IPSS-R risk group, hypomethylating agent (HMA) exposure, and venetoclax exposure. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed, and landmark analyses were performed at the median follow-up time (29 months). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal mEASIX cut-off value for mortality prediction. Model comparison, internal validation, and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: During a median follow-up of 29 months, 85 deaths occurred. The mEASIX yielded an AUC of 0.767 for mortality prediction (95% CI 0.691–0.844; p < 0.001). Patients with a high mEASIX had inferior overall survival (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis including age, IPSS-R risk group, HMA exposure, and venetoclax exposure, log(mEASIX) remained independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.325, 95% CI 1.166–1.506; p < 0.001). In landmark analyses, this association persisted during the early follow-up period (≤29 months; HR 1.347, 95% CI 1.172–1.548; p < 0.001) but was attenuated during the late period (>29 months; HR 1.287, 95% CI 0.930–1.782; p = 0.128). Conclusions: The baseline mEASIX was independently associated with overall survival in patients with MDS and appeared most prognostically relevant during early follow-up. These findings suggest that the mEASIX may complement established risk models, although further validation is needed before broader clinical use.