Background: The long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is poor. Systemic therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy are widely used in HCC patients with PVTT. This study aims to explore the efficacy of combining systemic therapy with transarterial-based therapy in HCC patients with PVTT. Materials and methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed data of HCC patients with PVTT treated with combination therapy (TACE-hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors) or TACE alone in SYSUCC from 2011 to 2020. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding bias. Results: A total of 743 HCC patients with PVTT received combination therapy (n=139) or TACE alone (n=604). After propensity score matching, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the TACE group [42.1% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001 (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours); 53.7% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001 (modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours)]. The combination group showed significantly better OS than the TACE group (median OS not reached vs. 10.4 months, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival of the combination and TACE groups was 14.8 and 2.3 months (P < 0.001), respectively. Tumour downstaging followed by salvage liver resection was significantly more common for the combination therapy group than for TACE group (46.3% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). After salvage liver resection, 31.6% (30/95) and 1.7% (3/179) of the patients achieved a pathological complete response in the combination and TACE groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The grade 3/4 adverse events rates were similar between the two groups (28.1% vs. 35.9%, P=0.092). Conclusion: Compared with TACE alone, combination therapy was safe enough and resulted in survival benefits. This is a promising treatment option for HCC patients with PVTT.

Although oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been effective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), primary or acquired resistance to oxaliplatin remains a major challenge in the clinic. Through functional screening using CRISPR/Cas9 activation library, transcriptomic profiling of clinical samples, and functional validation in vitro and in vivo, we identify PRMT3 as a key driver of oxaliplatin resistance. Mechanistically, PRMT3-mediated oxaliplatin-resistance is in part dependent on the methylation of IGF2BP1 at R452, which is critical for the function of IGF2BP1 in stabilizing the mRNA of HEG1, an effector of PRMT3-IGF2BP1 axis. Also, PRMT3 overexpression may serve as a biomarker for oxaliplatin resistance in HCC patients. Collectively, our study defines the PRTM3-IGF2BP1-HEG1 axis as important regulators and therapeutic targets in oxaliplatin-resistance and suggests the potential to use PRMT3 expression level in pretreatment biopsy as a biomarker for oxaliplatin-resistance in HCC patients.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the major treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it may cause hypoxic environment, leading to rapid progression after treatment. Here, using high‐throughput sequencing on different models, S100 calcium binding protein A9 (S100A9) is identified as a key oncogene involved in post‐TACE progression. Depletion or pharmacologic inhibition of S100A9 significantly dampens the growth and metastatic ability of HCC. Mechanistically, TACE induces S100A9 via hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α (HIF1A)‐mediated pathway. S100A9 acts as a scaffold recruiting ubiquitin specific peptidase 10 and phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 (PGAM5) to form a tripolymer, causing the deubiquitination and stabilization of PGAM5, leading to mitochondrial fission and reactive oxygen species production, thereby promoting the growth and metastasis of HCC. Higher S100A9 level in HCC tissue or in serum predicts a worse outcome for HCC patients. Collectively, this study identifies S100A9 as a key driver for post‐TACE HCC progression. Targeting S100A9 may be a promising therapeutic strategy for HCC patients.

Summary: Background: Whether microwave ablation (MWA) challenges the standard role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.Aim: To compare the efficacy of MWA vs RFA for treating primary HCC within the Milan criteria.Methods: From January 2002 to January 2017, the oncological outcomes after MWA (126 patients) and RFA (436 patients) were analysed by propensity score matching.Results: Before propensity score matching, for overall patients, MWA resulted in similar 5‐year overall survival to RFA (80.1% vs 75.8%, P = 0.190) but better 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (28.1% vs 19.6%, P = 0.036). For solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm, MWA resulted in comparable 5‐year overall survival (81.8% vs 77.1%, P = 0.170) to RFA but better 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (34.6% vs 24.0%, P = 0.042). After propensity score matching, MWA resulted in better 5‐year overall survival (79.3% vs 68.4%, P = 0.021) and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (27.9% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001) than RFA for HCC. For solitary HCC ≤3 cm, MWA resulted in comparable 5‐year overall survival (81.2% vs 66.3%, P = 0.062) and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (37.7% vs 17.4%, P = 0.088) to RFA. In Cox analysis, RFA modality, tumours located in risk areas and low serum albumin levels were unfavourable prognostic factors for overall survival. RFA modality, multiple tumours, tumour size and low serum albumin levels were unfavourable prognostic factors for recurrence‐free survival (all P < 0.05).Conclusions: RFA is inferior to MWA for treating HCC within the Milan criteria, but has comparable efficacy to MWA for solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm.

Background: Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1) is a newly identified gene that plays a role in colon cancer metastasis through upregulation of c-MET proto-oncogene (c-MET). However, the value of MACC1 as a potential biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown. Methods: MACC1 mRNA expression in 128 HCC tissues was examined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. To show the potential correlation of MACC1 and c-MET, c-MET was also analysed. Results: MACC1 was more highly expressed in HCC than in non-HCC tissues (P = 0.009). High MACC1 expression was significantly increased in cases with high alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (P = 0.025). A positive correlation was found between MACC1 and c-MET mRNAs (r = 0.235, P = 0.009). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that MACC1 expression was associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Moreover, stratified analysis showed that tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage I patients with high MACC1 levels had shorter OS and DFS than those with low MACC1. Conclusions: MACC1 may identify low- and high-risk individuals with HCC and be a valuable indicator for stratifying the prognosis of TNM stage I patients. MACC1 may serve as a novel biomarker for HCC.