This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of three ceramic-reinforced polymer (CRP) crowns—Cerasmart^® 270 (CE; milled), VarseoSmile Crown Plus^® (VS; 3D-printed) and the newly developed Hassawat-01 (HS; 3D-printed)—luted with cements of different elastic moduli. The principal hypothesis was that neither the CRP type nor the modulus of cement would significantly affect fracture resistance. Ninety-nine mandibular first molar resin dies were restored with 1 mm thick CE, VS, or HS crowns (n = 33 each) and luted with Maxcem Elite^®, RelyX Unicem^®, or Ketac Cem^® (n = 11 per subgroup). Occlusal cement morphology was evaluated using Micro-CT. Fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Crowns luted with Maxcem or RelyX withstood forces >2000 N without visible failure. Ketac-luted crowns showed reduced fracture resistance. CE-Ketac fractured in 4 of 11 specimens. VS-Ketac exhibited cracks or complete fractures (1795.2 ± 156.7 N), whereas HS-Ketac showed only superficial cracking (1732.6 ± 127.3 N). CRP crowns luted with lower-modulus resin cements demonstrated superior fracture resistance compared with those luted with glass-ionomer. VS exhibited both cracking and occasional complete fractures, whereas HS exhibited only surface cracking. All materials withstood loads greater than typical masticatory forces, supporting HS as a promising alternative within the CRP.

A novel alumina-filled ceramic-reinforced polymer (CRP) crown (Hassawat-01; HS) was developed. This study evaluated the effect of luting cement on the marginal and internal adaptation of HS and compared its performance with a commercial DLP-printed CRP (VarseoSmile Crown Plus^®; VS) and a milled resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart^® 270; CE). Ninety-nine crowns (n = 33/material) were fabricated with a 50 µm cement space and luted using Maxcem Elite^®, RelyX Unicem^®, or Ketac Cem^® (n = 11/subgroup). Adaptation was assessed without and with cementation using micro-computed tomography at 160 measurement points per crown. Without cementation, HS demonstrated the most favorable internal adaptation, whereas VS showed the best marginal adaptation. Following cementation, gap dimensions increased in all groups. Despite its superior non-cementation fit, HS exhibited the greatest increase in marginal and internal discrepancies, suggesting increased hydraulic resistance during seating. Among the evaluated cement–crown combinations, VS luted with RelyX Unicem^® showed the most favorable post-cementation adaptation. Post-cementation analysis was limited to HS and VS because the radiopacity of CE prevented reliable cement interface segmentation. These findings indicate that adaptation is influenced by both crown geometry and cement properties, and that highly adapted intaglio surfaces may require careful cement selection to optimize clinical fit.