Jesús Cernades Gómez

Mr. Jesús Cernades Gómez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2026 in Algorithms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJosé Alberto Flores-Salinas
José Alberto Flores-Salinas
COCECILIA CONSTANZA RIOS VARILLAS DE OSCANOA
CECILIA CONSTANZA RIOS VARILLAS DE OSCANOA
FTFreddy Tineo-Córdova
Freddy Tineo-Córdova
JCJulio Cabrera-Chávez
Julio Cabrera-Chávez
JGJesús Cernades Gómez
Jesús Cernades Gómez
BLBlanca Laines-Lozano
Blanca Laines-Lozano
Although interior-point methods (IPMs) have transformed mathematical programming since 1984, the original projective Karmarkar algorithm is rarely documented step by step on reproducible engineering examples that combine algorithmic transparency with real resource allocation constraints. This article therefore does not propose a new variant of Karmarkar’s algorithm; rather, its scientific contribution is the reproducible MATLAB implementation, canonical-form conversion, and comparative validation of the original projective method against the revised Simplex method and Barnes’ affine scaling variant in two engineering settings. The case studies are (i) the minimum-weight plastic design of a rigid frame with seven candidate plastic hinge locations and six collapse mechanisms and (ii) the optimal allocation of crop patterns in the Caplina Valley (Tacna, Southern Peru), an arid irrigated system with an irrigated command area of 1253 ha, monthly labor availability of 22,239 jornales, and water availability derived from Caplina River discharges at 75% persistence. For Case I, the algorithm reached F = 1.001 in the normalized dual space, which corresponds to F = 4.251 in the original structural objective after applying the scaling factor 17/4; relative to the analytical optimum F* = 4.25, this gives |4.251 − 4.25|/4.25 = 2.4 × 10−4 after 20 iterations. For Case II, the model yielded the maximum net production value of USD 703,135.92, allocating 948.47 ha among 12 crops while satisfying water, labor, market, and land constraints. The double validation confirms the algorithm’s strictly interior trajectory, polynomial-time rationale, and transparent internal parameters (α = 0.7968, ε = 10−8), making the implementation a reproducible benchmark for educational use and for future AI–operations research hybrid solvers in regions with limited access to commercial optimization software.

5 January 2026 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DGDiana Carolina Flores Gallo
Diana Carolina Flores Gallo
JGJesús Cernades Gómez
Jesús Cernades Gómez
WCWilliam Echegaray Castillo
William Echegaray Castillo
This paper studies various numerical methods for computing the square root of a matrix, a problem of interest in several areas of applied mathematics, such as the solution of differential equations and the analysis of dynamical systems. The work analyzes the conditions under which a matrix has a square root, and explores different techniques for its approximation, including Newton’s method, the Denman-Beavers iteration, and Pade based methods. Stability, convergence and computational efficiency are discussed for each approach. To validate the algorithms, numerical experiments implemented in MATLAB are presented using specific test matrices. The results show that some algorithms, such as the scaled Pade method, offer greater stability and faster convergence, particularly for symmetric positive definite matrices. Finally, the methods are compared in terms of the number of iterations, the accuracy achieved, and their applicability depending on the spectral properties of the matrix.