The aim of this study is to predict local failure after partial prostate re-irradiation for the treatment of isolated locally recurrent prostate cancer by using a machine learning classifier based on radiomic features from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET) and biological effective dose distribution (BED) of the radiotherapy plan. The analysis was conducted on a monocentric dataset of 43 patients with evidence of isolated intraprostatic recurrence of prostate cancer after primary external beam radiotherapy. All patients received partial prostate re-irradiation delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy. The gross tumor volume (GTV) of each patient was manually contoured from planning CT, choline-PET and dose maps. An ensemble machine learning pipeline including unbalanced data correction and feature selection was trained using the radiomic and dosiomic features as input for predicting occurrence of local failure. The model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curves of the score function in 10-fold cross validation repeated 100 times. Local failure was observed in 13 patients (30%), with a median time to recurrence of 36.7 months (range = 6.1–102.4 months). A four variables ensemble machine learning model resulted in accuracy of 0.62 and AUC 0.65. According to our results, a dosiomic machine learning classifier can predict local failure after partial prostate re-irradiation.
Purpose: to predict eligibility for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT) treatment of patients with left breast cancer from analysis of respiratory signal, using Deep Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) recurrent neural networks. Methods: The respiratory traces from 36 patients who underwent DIBH RT were collected. The patients’ RT treatment plans were generated for both DIBH and free-breathing (FB) modalities. The patients were divided into two classes (patient eligible or not), based on the decrease of maximum dose to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery achieved with DIBH, compared to that achieved with FB and ΔDL. Patients with ΔDL > median value of ΔDL within the patient cohort were assumed to be those selected for DIBH. A BLSTM-RNN was trained for classification of patients eligible for DIBH by analysis of their respiratory signals, as acquired during acquisition of the pre-treatment computed tomography (CT), for selecting the window for DIBH. The dataset was split into training (60%) and test groups (40%), and the hyper-parameters, including the number of hidden layers, the optimizer, the learning rate, and the number of epochs, were selected for optimising model performance. The BLSTM included 2 layers of 100 neural units, each followed by a dropout layer with 20% dropout, and was trained in 35 epochs using the Adam optimizer, with an initial learning rate of 0.0003. Results: The system achieved accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of, F1 score and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 71.4%, 66.7%, 80.1%, 72.4%, and 69.4% in the test dataset, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed BLSTM-RNN classified patients in the test set eligible for DIBH with good accuracy. These results look promising for building an accurate and robust decision system to provide automated assistance to the radiotherapy team in assigning patients to DIBH.
4 March 2025 in Radiological Physics and Technology
Background/Objectives: Dental metallic implants cause severe streaking artifacts in kilovoltage CT (kVCT), compromising dose calculation in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning. The purpose of this study is to assess the dosimetric agreement of synthetic MVCT (sMVCT) images generated from artifact-affected kVCT using a deep learning network with respect to true MVCT (tMVCT) acquired at the treatment machine. Methods: Nineteen head and neck cancer patients with dental metallic implants treated with RT were included. Planning kVCT images were converted to sMVCT using Metal Artifact Reduction through Domain Transformation Network (MAR-DTN), a UNet-inspired deep learning network. The sMVCT images were rigidly registered to true MVCT (tMVCT) acquired on the Hi-Art II Tomotherapy system. Mean Hounsfield Unit (HU) values were compared across seven structures (thyroid, bilateral parotids, brainstem, spinal cord, GTV, PTV70) using pairwise Wilcoxon tests and Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) for statistical equivalence within a pre-specified margin of ±20 HU (corresponding to a 2% deviation in physical density). Dose distributions were recalculated on sMVCT using the AAA algorithm and compared to reference tMVCT-based plans via dose–volume histogram (DVH) metrics, evaluated for equivalence by TOST within a margin of ±2% of the prescribed dose (±142 cGy of 70.95 Gy), and via 3D gamma index, evaluated by one-sided non-inferiority test against the clinically accepted thresholds of 90% (2 mm/2%) and 95% (3 mm/3%). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis was performed by repeating all comparisons on the strictly independent sub-cohort (n = 16) excluding three patients drawn from the MAR-DTN training set. Results: All seven anatomical structures showed statistical equivalence between sMVCT and tMVCT under the ±20 HU margin (TOST p < 0.05; mean HU differences in the range −1.1 to +8.4 HU; all Wilcoxon p > 0.05). All nine DVH metrics achieved formal dosimetric equivalence within ±2% of the prescribed dose (TOST p < 0.05). Mean 3D gamma pass rates were 94.3% (95% CI: 89.3–97.1) for the 2 mm/2% criterion and 97.6% (95% CI: 94.8–99.0) for the 3 mm/3% criterion, both formally non-inferior to the respective clinical thresholds (p < 0.0001). Residual gamma failures were concentrated at the patient surface, consistent with inter-session repositioning uncertainty rather than errors in synthetic image generation. Sensitivity analysis on the n = 16 sub-cohort confirmed all conclusions, with mean HU and DVH differences smaller than in the full cohort for the structures showing the largest mean differences, and comparable for the remaining structures, with all TOST equivalence and gamma non-inferiority tests confirmed in both cohorts. Conclusions: sMVCT images generated via MAR-DTN show dosimetric agreement with physically acquired tMVCT in head and neck patients with dental implants, formally demonstrated by TOST equivalence within ±2% of prescribed dose for all DVH metrics. The combined HU and gamma index framework presented here represents a promising quality assurance approach for AI-based synthetic imaging tools in radiotherapy, pending validation in larger prospective multicentre cohorts.