Antonio Antela

Dr. Antonio Antela


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2016 in HIV Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAntonio Antela
Antonio Antela
CAC Aguiar
C Aguiar
JCJ Compston
J Compston
BHBm Hendry
Bm Hendry
MBM Boffito
M Boffito
GPG Di Perri
G Di Perri
HIV infection has become a chronic condition rather than an acute life‐threatening disease in developed countries, thanks to consistent innovation and evolution of effective interventions. This has altered HIV management and created new challenges. People living with HIV (PLWHIV) are living longer and so encounter comorbidities linked not only with their disease, but also with ageing, lifestyle and chronic exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Although longevity, viral suppression and the prevention of viral transmission remain key goals, more needs to be achieved to encompass the vision of attaining an optimum level of overall health. Treatment choices and management practices should ensure patients’ long‐term health with minimal comorbidity. Treatments that balance optimal efficacy with the potential for improved long‐term safety are needed for all patients. In this review, we consider the evolution and development of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir which offers high antiviral efficacy at doses over ten times lower than that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Emerging clinical data suggest that elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and TAF (E/C/F/TAF) as a single‐tablet regimen offers highly effective viral suppression in treatment‐naïve and treatment‐experienced patients with an improved renal and bone safety profile compared with TDF, this having been demonstrated in diverse groups including patients with existing renal impairment and adolescents. The profile of TAF identifies it as an agent with a promising role within future ART regimens that aim to deliver the vision of undetectable viral load, while requiring less monitoring and having a safety profile designed to minimize comorbid risks while supporting good long‐term health.


30 March 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFátima Brañas
Fátima Brañas
MGMª José Galindo
Mª José Galindo
MTMiguel Torralba
Miguel Torralba
AAAntonio Antela
Antonio Antela
JVJorge Vergas
Jorge Vergas
OGon behalf of the FUNCFRAIL study group
on behalf of the FUNCFRAIL study group
Background: People in their fifties with HIV are considered older adults, but they appear not to be a homogeneous group.Objective: To evaluate the differences among older adults with HIV according to their chronological age and the year of HIV diagnosis.Methods: Cross-sectional study of the FUNCFRAIL cohort. Patients 50 or over with HIV were included and were stratified by both chronological age and the year of HIV diagnosis: before 1996 (long-term HIV survivors [LTHS]) and after 1996. We recorded sociodemographic data, HIV-related factors, comorbidities, frailty, physical function, other geriatric syndromes, and quality of life (QOL).Results: We evaluated 801 patients. Of these, 24.7% were women, 47.0% were LTHS, and 14.7% were 65 or over. Of the 65 or over patients, 73% were diagnosed after 1996. Higher rates of comorbidities among LTHS were found, being the more prevalent: COPD, history of cancer, osteoarthritis, depression, and other psychiatric disorders while the more prevalent among the 65 or over patients were: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cancer, and osteoarthritis. LTHS showed a significantly worse QOL. There were no differences by the year of HIV diagnosis regarding frailty and functional impairment (SPPB <10) but they were more than twice as prevalent in the 65 or over patients compared to the other chronological age groups.Conclusions: A LTHS and a 65 or over person are both “older adults with HIV,” but their characteristics and requirements differ markedly. It is mandatory to design specific approaches focused on the real needs of the different profiles.

1 October 2006 in Human Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ana MorenoAna Moreno
Ana Moreno
AMAlberto Moreno
Alberto Moreno
MEMaría Jesús Pérez Elías
María Jesús Pérez Elías
CQCarmen Quereda
Carmen Quereda
RFRafael Fernández-Muñoz
Rafael Fernández-Muñoz
Santiago Moreno GuillénSantiago Moreno Guillén
Santiago Moreno Guillén

1 March 2022 in Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSantiago Moreno
Santiago Moreno
BABernardino Alcazar
Bernardino Alcazar
CDCarlos Dueñas
Carlos Dueñas
JCJuan González del Castillo
Juan González del Castillo
JOJulián Olalla
Julián Olalla
AAAntonio Antela
Antonio Antela
The aim of this report is to review the literature and shed light on the uncertainties surrounding the use of antiviral agents in general and remdesivir in COVID-19 patients. This review evaluated a battery of antiviral compounds and their effectiveness in the treatment of COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. Remdesivir is the only antiviral approved by the EMA and FDA for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This work extensively reviews remdesivir data generated from clinical trials and observational studies, paying attention to the most recent data, and focusing on outcomes to give readers a more comprehensive understanding of the results. This review also discusses the recommendations issued by official bodies during the pandemic in the light of the current knowledge. The use of remdesivir in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection is justified because a virus is the causative agent that triggers the inflammatory responses and its consequences. More trials are needed to improve the management of this disease.

10 February 2001 in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFernando Dronda
Fernando Dronda
JCJose Luis Casado
Jose Luis Casado
Santiago Moreno GuillénSantiago Moreno Guillén
Santiago Moreno Guillén
KHKurt Hertogs
Kurt Hertogs
IGIsabel García-Arata
Isabel García-Arata
BLBrendan Larder
Brendan Larder
Cross-resistance to nelfinavir (NFV) is observed in patients failing protease inhibitor (PI)-containing therapies. We performed a study with 111 patients who started an NFV-based salvage regimen after failing PI-based therapy to evaluate genotypic changes and to identify factors associated with resistance to NFV. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance data at entry (111 and 51 samples) and after NFV failure (74 and 31 samples) were available. Median CD4+ cell count was 208 × 106/liter, HIV RNA level was 4.6 log10 copies/ml, and median number of mutations in the protease was 9. At baseline, 51 and 14% of viral isolates showed high or intermediate phenotypic resistance to NFV. Phenotypic data correlated with virological outcome, reaching undetectability at the third month in 40, 14, and 0% of those patients with susceptible, intermediate, or resistant viral isolates, respectively. Phenotypic resistance to NFV was associated with the presence of the L90M mutation: 46% for resistant vs. 6% in susceptible strains. The number of mutations in the protease correlated with the fold-increase in the IC50-NFV. The D30N mutation was detected in only 1 of 74 patients who failed. In a logistic regression analysis, the number of mutations in the protease was associated with NFV cross-resistance (RR, 2.09 per each additional mutation; 95% CI 1.23-3.55; p < 0.01). In conclusion, phenotypic cross-resistance to NFV for PI-experienced patients can be predicted by the number of mutations in the protease. The L90M mutation is significantly associated with the subsequent failure of NFV-containing regimens. The presence of the D30N mutation was rare and not useful in identifying NFV-resistant isolates.