Background: For stage I non-small cell lung cancer surgery remains the cornerstone of the treatment and the use of minimally invasive technique is desirable. The lack of tactile feedback in RATS is a well-known drawback of this approach, so the precise identification of the disease is crucial for performing the lung resection. Methods: We present our retrospective case history, accounting for 82 patients, divided into two groups based on marking technique: 99mTc-MAA (99mTechnetium Albumin Macroaggregates) only (Tech group) (22 cases, 26,5%) and 99mTc-MAA + Indocianine green (Tech+ICG group) (61 cases, 73,49%). Results: In Tech group there were 11 males (50%) ad 11 females (50%), median nodule diameter was 21,5mm (IQR 16), median distance of the nodule from visceral pleura was 18 mm (IQR 21). Eighteen out of 22 nodules (81,82%) were subsolid. Three conversions were reported, all due to failure to identify the nodule (13,63%). Mean operative time was 111,6 ± 45,6 min. At the histopathological examination resulted 13 lung adenocarcinomas, 1 squamous cells carcinomas, 2 minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas, 2 lung adenocarcinomas in situ, 3 metastases from another tumor and 1 benign nodule. In Tech+ICG group there were 27 males (44,26%) and 34 females (55,73%), median nodule diameter was 18mm (IQR 14), median distance of the nodule from visceral pleura was 24mm (IQR 15). Forty-six out of 61 nodules were subsolid (75,4%). Four conversion was reported, due to failure in nodule identification (6,55%). Operative time was 105,6 ± 36,8 min. At the histopathological examination resulted 12 lung adenocarcinomas, 7 squamous cells carcinoma, 9 minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas, 12 lung adenocarcinomas in situ, 1 typical carcinoid, 7 atypical adenomatous hyperplasias, 7 metastases from another tumor and 6 benign nodules. The two groups are homogeneous in terms of median nodule diameter (p = 0,676), median distance from visceral pleura (p = 0,114), SUV max (p = 0,894), operative time (p = 0,512), nodule characteristics (solid vs subsolid) (p = 0,724). Conclusions: Both techniques appear to be safe and reproducible. Further standardized studies are needed to validate and confirm the results obtained from our case series.